InvestorsHub Logo

mattchew

07/12/18 5:35 PM

#526233 RE: mattchew #526231

If shareholders of WMI were actually shareholders of WMB, then yes, the 75/25% thing would have been a violation of the APR!

That is how Piers are impaired and yet shareholders of WMI are not bound to the payout matrix of the WMI-LT