InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 75
Posts 10520
Boards Moderated 3
Alias Born 02/19/2008

Re: mattchew post# 526231

Thursday, 07/12/2018 5:35:56 PM

Thursday, July 12, 2018 5:35:56 PM

Post# of 729793
If shareholders of WMI were actually shareholders of WMB, then yes, the 75/25% thing would have been a violation of the APR!

That is how Piers are impaired and yet shareholders of WMI are not bound to the payout matrix of the WMI-LT
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent COOP News