Selling by insiders: If so, we would know within 2 days since they would have to file an SEC report (based on what some have been saying). So far, nothing, at least nothing in past 2 days.
Selling by Oceanside: Maybe. Maybe they've been selling since $3.04. But they fall in the category of "toxic financiers" (not my label) so theoretically, they are just profit taking all the way without thought of nFusz as a company itself. So their actions do not necessarily indicate the quality of nFusz or the product. They are solely here to make a profit. Allegedly.
Selling by Reddy or private investors in general: Who knows why they invested in the first place? To make a ten-bagger or to be the next Warren Buffett? I don't think any of their actions serve as direct barometers of the company's worth because we don't know what their investing philosophy is at least pertaining to nFusz.
As for reviews, out of all of the apps on the front page (Featured Apps, Staff Picks, etc), only two had more than 4 reviews. What conclusion can be drawn regarding these apps? Why do some featured apps and staff picks have no reviews? Is someone pulling a fast one. Quantity of reviews means little in relation to success of product especially for one as new as notifiCRM. On another note, I think the suiteapp.com site itself could use a big overhaul.
Silence on sales. I agree somewhat that Rory would be yodeling on the mountains if sales numbers were great. But you can't automatically assume the inverse, that silence indicates bad numbers. Logical fallacy. He gave one reason (negotiation leverage) which some here do not buy. Fine. At this point, it's probably moot since it's my impression that he is being muzzled. The next 10Q will put this issue to rest, at least until 3Q.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
