InvestorsHub Logo

Zorax

05/31/17 1:04 PM

#364313 RE: BeverlyH #364312

gulash has 'splainin' to do..
Although nobody updated the nevada site or anything.

Is goulie saying he wasn't on board when most of the crimes happened but after so he isn't accountable?


http://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/NTEK/news/NanoTech-Entertainment-and-Swig-Media-LLC-Form-Joint-Venture?id=149188&b=y

Zorax

05/31/17 1:24 PM

#364314 RE: BeverlyH #364312

There really isn't enough info yet to ascertain whether gulash's attorney is claiming gulash isn't involved with nanosux. Involved, but not with the recent lawsuit actions?
Gulash can claim he wasn't on board for any of the previous accusations, thus not a party?
Trying not to jump conclusions here.

Ranchersw

05/31/17 1:31 PM

#364316 RE: BeverlyH #364312

BWAHAHAHAHA!! GULAS NTEK LEGAL TROUBLES JUST BEGINNING!

Ranchersw

06/01/17 1:49 PM

#364402 RE: BeverlyH #364312

Long Side lawsuit update? Curious to know what the judge had to say about Dr. Ivan Gulas claiming not to be a party to NTEK being the ex CEO and David Foley claiming he is currently still the head of Ultraflix.

BeverlyH

07/04/17 6:23 PM

#365112 RE: BeverlyH #364312

Think Gulas will comply with the court order?

Gulas has been ordered (yet again) to appear tomorrow in Broward County.


I'd put my money on another load of BS "not involved" filing from his attorney, but with all the evidence filed by Long Side, you never know. On the downhill slide towards 80, Gulas might just cut his losses and throw the entire Foley scam under the bus in court.

Thinking out load, perhaps the 10 milly in fresh new dilution was to buy off his silence. Who knows?

The truth will come out eventually.