InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 183
Posts 53378
Boards Moderated 10
Alias Born 12/20/2004

Re: BeverlyH post# 364312

Wednesday, 05/31/2017 1:24:21 PM

Wednesday, May 31, 2017 1:24:21 PM

Post# of 380583
There really isn't enough info yet to ascertain whether gulash's attorney is claiming gulash isn't involved with nanosux. Involved, but not with the recent lawsuit actions?
Gulash can claim he wasn't on board for any of the previous accusations, thus not a party?
Trying not to jump conclusions here.