InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

ColeThornton

08/25/06 11:47 PM

#38635 RE: pokestake #38632

<<<we even have a profit incredibly enogh.>>>

GTE lost 4 cents a share in the last quarter. GTE has lost over 50 million dollars so far. Why do so many on this board keep saying they have a profit?
icon url

SAMdashada

08/25/06 11:54 PM

#38637 RE: pokestake #38632

pokestake you just posted:

"So the backbone of success here lies with the fundamental faith of long investors in the enterprise."

pokestake, you talk about "longs" -- pokestake just how "long" have you been a "long"?

I have been a "long" since October of 1997. I was a "long" before you ever heard of this company (under whatever name it was known -- ADGI/GTEL/GTE).

So your use of the term "long" is relative to your time involved with this company.
icon url

crashtestsuperstar

08/26/06 1:44 AM

#38645 RE: pokestake #38632

I agreed up until the point you commented that people like me are sticking around and being complaintant because the share price is so low - and you especially lost me when you try to conclude that much of the tech with this company is searching for a market.

The truth is - many of us are stressed on what appears to be something external driving this company down (in both publicity and in share price). The truth is - that aside from the Stratellite, every one of their technologies has been a proven revenue source for other companies. And some of those companies have based their entire market strategy on just one or two of them, in fact. Take Qwest, for example, - with their minutes-resale model, brokered from the surplus of the major telcos.

The difference here is - that Globetel is looking to acheive this at such a lower cost that it benefits underpriviledged or less wealthy nations globally (or those looking for one of the lowest cost solutions), to be able to rapidly establish an infrastructure that covers as many of the bases as they wish to bring to market. ("You need that? We got that.")

I just think there's details that need to be rectified in order for the company to take everything to the next level, and only because there's a few issues complicating things at the moment. To me, they don't really play into whether or not the company can execute its plan, just that it's become obvious that some form of action must be taken to clean house or expose the problems to the proper parties so everyone can move on.

I'm also of the mindset at all times that a few rotten apples does not spoil the load. I think it's a great company with the right people at the highest levels. Whatever 'association(s)' that may have been having a negative impact however, is/are just the spoiled lot that needs to get taken out of the bunch.