I agreed up until the point you commented that people like me are sticking around and being complaintant because the share price is so low - and you especially lost me when you try to conclude that much of the tech with this company is searching for a market.
The truth is - many of us are stressed on what appears to be something external driving this company down (in both publicity and in share price). The truth is - that aside from the Stratellite, every one of their technologies has been a proven revenue source for other companies. And some of those companies have based their entire market strategy on just one or two of them, in fact. Take Qwest, for example, - with their minutes-resale model, brokered from the surplus of the major telcos.
The difference here is - that Globetel is looking to acheive this at such a lower cost that it benefits underpriviledged or less wealthy nations globally (or those looking for one of the lowest cost solutions), to be able to rapidly establish an infrastructure that covers as many of the bases as they wish to bring to market. ("You need that? We got that.")
I just think there's details that need to be rectified in order for the company to take everything to the next level, and only because there's a few issues complicating things at the moment. To me, they don't really play into whether or not the company can execute its plan, just that it's become obvious that some form of action must be taken to clean house or expose the problems to the proper parties so everyone can move on.
I'm also of the mindset at all times that a few rotten apples does not spoil the load. I think it's a great company with the right people at the highest levels. Whatever 'association(s)' that may have been having a negative impact however, is/are just the spoiled lot that needs to get taken out of the bunch.