InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

capgain

08/20/06 6:27 PM

#71483 RE: Mattu #71482

LOL!
icon url

mimurray

08/20/06 6:56 PM

#71484 RE: Mattu #71482

Long overdue!!!! Thanks!!!
icon url

waterwisp

08/20/06 7:10 PM

#71485 RE: Mattu #71482

...man, man, man...that's unfortunate !

Matt, I really wish you would rethink that decision !

With all due respect...it seems a tad bit excessive !

Come on...whadda ya say ?
icon url

Tina

08/20/06 8:11 PM

#71491 RE: Mattu #71482

WHOA! That was soooooo MANLY!

I bet you've been wanting to do that to many for a long time.
icon url

lucky, mydog

08/20/06 8:19 PM

#71495 RE: Mattu #71482

matt, you have been patient beyond expectations.
icon url

4Godnwv

08/20/06 9:06 PM

#71506 RE: Mattu #71482

Matt - could you possibly add 'OT' to the list of reasons moderators can delete posts on a non-premium board?

We recently had a discussion on the 'goldbugs' board designed to help a poster learn how to post a chart (free member, so PM was not an option).

There are probably a dozen posts that need to be deleted, everyone agrees, no arguments, just 'clutter' after we finished our discussion.

Problem is there is no category that fits.

4God
icon url

retiremenow

08/21/06 9:51 AM

#71537 RE: Mattu #71482

Matt: Good call! Well desrved boot e/ RMN
icon url

Churak

08/21/06 12:07 PM

#71542 RE: Mattu #71482

back up to 161 inmates...need to release DC & fry the rest...IMHO...
icon url

IRISHBULL

08/21/06 9:28 PM

#71597 RE: Mattu #71482

Yo, boss man, I guess I could watch over this board while greg is gone..

http://www.investorshub.com/boards/board.asp?board_id=1329
icon url

Tenchu

08/22/06 5:48 PM

#71635 RE: Mattu #71482

Matt, I just followed this thread after finding out why Greg S got the boot. Now I won't contest the banning of someone whose excessive posting becomes detrimental to the community as a whole. But I will contest the banning on the grounds of double-standards.

You see, there is a moderator of this one board who has repeatedly sent harassing private messages to at least four members now. As far as I know, most if not all of them have complained to you, only to get a response from you saying, "Ignore him." Unfortunately, this moderator seems to be able to override the Ignore feature on IHub, thus forcing the recipients to resort to "mental ignore."

Now I'm sure this moderator still provides useful services and information whenever he wants to. However, his behavior clearly constitutes harassment, and I don't think anything can make up for it. At least Greg S is arguing something that he passionately believes in. Even his signature to me is just as benign as residents of the District of Columbia sporting license plates that say "Taxation Without Representation." (OMFG! Treason!) But the moderator is clearly exhibiting immature behavior at best, dangerous at worst.

Bottom line: Why does this moderator continue to have an active account? Why is this person allowed to continue acting as a moderator of a thread when he is clearly unfit to be one? And why should Greg S be banned on a charge that IMO amounts to civil disobedience? Just because Greg personally rubbed YOU the wrong way?

To me, the TOU standard should be applied equally. If some leeway is allowed for passions and tempers to flare within reason, that's fine. If a strict standard is necessary to keep these forums from degenerating into the useless drivel that dominates most Internet posting forums, that's fine as well. But I will not idly sit by and see someone whom I've respected for so long get booted while at the same time see someone who doesn't deserve an ounce of respect remain on these forums.

Tenchu

P.S. - The name of said "moderator" will remain unmentioned for the time being. I'm sure you know who I'm talking about, along with others who have been personally involved, especially involuntarily.