The company was delisted on July 31 of 2015 and the stock declined, lost most of its trading liquidity, and could no longer raise money relying on rule 144
These are facts and the judge will see them as very damaging to a tiny company.
If it were so meaningless to be on otcqb vs. OTC pink limited info tier, then why do companies spend so much money and time being compliant with so many rules to maintain that listing
Your argument that the Delisitng had no damage value simply because the stock still traded is an incorrect argument. And not grounded in reality
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
