InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Bobinsd

11/06/16 1:21 PM

#113901 RE: esq10 #113900

In addition, I believe that even though the settlement possibilities have been moved back, and also that salaries will still rise in spite of flat revenues, that there will be NO change in the position Mark stated about NO R/S. The company has adequate cash.
icon url

Gold49er

11/06/16 1:46 PM

#113902 RE: esq10 #113900

Esq10

What you stated about the Markman Hearing about mediation ( or appeal is what I had assume due to one line in the Makman hearing document.

That one line being The Federal Circuit in Phillips v. AWH Corp.
173, near the end on page 52.

I read a very long article on the reference in the Phillips Case and at first Phillips (plaintiff ) lost then after Appeal, A Panel of the court examined it and it was over turned. Find for the Plaintiff.

The problem in the Phillips Case was over the Definition of the Term "Baffle"

But the question is what happened in Mediation or the Appeal with SFOR vs PhoneFactor win or lose on the Markman hearing as the final Outcome?

49'er
icon url

Pugilista

11/06/16 3:25 PM

#113911 RE: esq10 #113900

I agree with your assessment. Kay stated the truth the litigation could take at least 3 years and we are just getting started. They could settle at anytime, but chances are they won't because they are still using the product since no injunction was filed to stop use of the product. The infringers aren't feeling the pain. So it's best to focus on the contracts and growth of co.
icon url

4sleddogs

11/06/16 4:26 PM

#113925 RE: esq10 #113900

Thanks for being here and monitoring our conversations regarding business law. Your expertise and input is most appreciated!