InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

N4longterm

06/20/16 11:56 PM

#109520 RE: janice shell #109519

The dipwad lied in his petition. He claimed that the court hasn't let him phone it in, but the Judge states that he has 3 times. Hearing all of the crap he has pulled, you would think he would at least tell the truth when it comes to court appearances.

icon url

Renee

06/21/16 10:09 AM

#109527 RE: janice shell #109519

For stipulated reasons the Judge denied Eade's request to appear telephonically on June 27. Most notably was the Judge's exposure of Eade's false statement that he had never before appeared telephonically when in fact Eade has appeared telephonically 3 times, per the Judge "See Dkt. 49, 64 & 68".

Eade made a colossal misrepresentation to the Court, ie., he lied, which supports Investorshub's contentions that Eade has lied on numerous occasions. Now Investorshub has the incontrovertible evidence of one significant lie to the Court which extends circumstantial credence to all of Investorshub's contentions of Eade's manufactured stories being lies.

Should Eade actually appear on June 27,2016 it is reasonable to expect the Judge will rule Eade in Contempt of (a) Court Order(s). And the Court should likely address Eade's deliberate misrepresentation to the Court.

If Eade does not appear there should be an additional Contempt of Court disposition, hopefully with a warrant for his arrest.

We wait with bated breath for the outcomes on June 27,2016. Then Eade can wait with baited breath for the Court's disposition. :-D

icon url

1manband

06/21/16 12:58 PM

#109535 RE: janice shell #109519

Uh oh. Ball is back in Kenny's court and I think his racquet is missing most of its strings.

It will be interesting to see if he actually communicates with the court or just doesn't bother to show up.
icon url

Doe 3

06/21/16 9:44 PM

#109561 RE: janice shell #109519

Best news I heard all day! Thanks Janice!