Replies to post #444472 on Mr Cooper Group Inc (COOP)

[Major_Bankz]

2018 , 2018 , 2018 , 2018 , 2018 , 2018 Milking will end and we will see how much we get for our LTI's. imo

[bkshadow]

An educated, experienced, understanding, precludes...

...the need for interpretation, IMHO.

tanjazielman Friday, 01/22/16 08:35:31 PM
Re: hotmeat post# 444468
Post #
444472
of 444477 Go
Exactly hotmeat.

This information can be interpreted with a open mind or a closed mind.

And in this case anything being possible (as is proven multiple times before) I prefer to have an open mindset as long as the bankruptcy is not finalized yet.

Let's wait and see. And let talk be just that, talk.

...WMIIC's were all liquidated, fully disclosed and the shell of the co-debtor is still with WMIHC.

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=120023706

...legal isolation, applicable to mortgages that have met process requirements allowing the sponsor bank (WMB) to record the SALE in a pending mortgage backed security issuance, protects the investors that have entered into the security transaction (not the sponsor) from the FDIC and creditors.

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=119996587

...the $299B of gross assets of WMB at seizure reconciles exactly to the amount recorded by JPMorgan in 2008, net of adjustments for fair market value, and disclosed in the audited financial statements and SEC filing.

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=119965774

...off-balance sheet concepts cannot be selectively applied, one the one hand stating they exist because they are publicly filed (JPMorgans off balance sheet "repurchase obligation" disclosure of $-0- on $165B of Deutsche Bank litigation claims) and on the other hand state they exist (at the FDIC or WMIIC in the WMILT or in WMIH, hard to tell, the assertions change daily) because "they aren't publicly filed."

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=120023416

...the term "all deposits" means the type of resolution, usually tied with a "whole bank" transaction and means that "all deposits, including uninsured deposits over the FDIC-C limit, are being assumed by the acquiring bank. Also, the amount of deposits at seizure at 1% were not $1.888B as the number being used to support such is from June 30, 2008.

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=119960468

...the $151B on the FDIC-R website is not an asset of the receivership. It represents the "subrogated claim" of the FDIC-C for the deposits of the seized institution.

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=119940468

...distributions to escrow holders who released will be in the range published by the WMILT, adjusted for the D&O settlement, period.

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=119928602

...the FDIC-R has no exposure to the litigation from Deutsche Bank, as it is only the assets of the receivership that are sought. The Agency is protected by law and regulation from any exposure above and beyond the assets of the receivership and is "not worried" at all about WMB's parent company WMI's former shareholders' escrow aspirations.

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=119861006

[bkshadow]

An educated, experienced, understanding, precludes...

...the need for interpretation, IMHO.

Quote:

tanjazielman Friday, 01/22/16 08:35:31 PM
Re: hotmeat post# 444468
Post #
444472
of 444477 Go
Exactly hotmeat.

This information can be interpreted with a open mind or a closed mind.

And in this case anything being possible (as is proven multiple times before) I prefer to have an open mindset as long as the bankruptcy is not finalized yet.

Let's wait and see. And let talk be just that, talk.

...WMIIC's assets were all liquidated, fully disclosed and the shell of the co-debtor is still with WMIHC.

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=120023706

...legal isolation, applicable to mortgages that have met process requirements allowing the sponsor bank (WMB) to record the SALE in a pending mortgage backed security issuance, protects the investors that have entered into the security transaction (not the sponsor) from the FDIC and creditors.

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=119996587

...the $299B of gross assets of WMB at seizure reconciles exactly to the amount recorded by JPMorgan in 2008, net of adjustments for fair market value, and disclosed in the audited financial statements and SEC filing.

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=119965774



...off-balance sheet concepts cannot be selectively applied, one the one hand stating they exist because they are publicly filed (JPMorgans off balance sheet "repurchase obligation" disclosure of $-0- on $165B of Deutsche Bank litigation claims) and on the other hand state they exist (at the FDIC or WMIIC in the WMILT or in WMIH, hard to tell, the assertions change daily) because "they aren't publicly filed."

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=120023416

...the term "all deposits" means the type of resolution, usually tied with a "whole bank" transaction and means that "all deposits, including uninsured deposits over the FDIC-C limit, are being assumed by the acquiring bank. Also, the amount of deposits at seizure at 1% were not $1.888B as the number being used to support such is from June 30, 2008.

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=119960468

...the $151B on the FDIC-R website is not an asset of the receivership. It represents the "subrogated claim" of the FDIC-C for the deposits of the seized institution.

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=119940468

...distributions to escrow holders who released will be in the range published by the WMILT, adjusted for the D&O settlement, period.

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=119928602

...the FDIC-R has no exposure to the litigation from Deutsche Bank, as it is only the assets of the receivership that are sought. The Agency is protected by law and regulation from any exposure above and beyond the assets of the receivership and is "not worried" at all about WMB's parent company WMI's former shareholders' escrow aspirations.

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=119861006