Gotta luv this guy!!!
Well at least it would be nice spending time with Steve Forbes and have someone to intelligently discuss world events with over a little Napoleon!!
FQM said their goal was to reduce Cap/ex and development expenditures by 1.5 Billion dollars with Cobre Panama. That was their claim to fame evidenced by their other development project histories and what they used to entice Inmet's shareholders to sell. Of course you don't know that because you do no DD or listen to their press conferences!! LOL!!!
In addition FQM publicly stated that they would be purchasing materials that they needed locally. Finally, then Pascalls also said there would be new contracts wherever possible over the next six months to see if things could be improved for the benefit of all parties.
Inasmuch as there were only binding term sheets and no definitive agreement between Inmet and PTQ, as both said in their press releases, exactly what do you expect PTQ to speak out about and defend??? There was no agreement!!!! So your request of PTQ looks as stupid as its source!!
At this moment FQM and PTQ are negotiating a much larger agreement that has a value above $400 million dollars instead of the $150 million dollar term sheet signed by PTQ and Inmet. But you know nothing about that either!!!
Re-read the alpha article and see that they like PTQ as a stand alone entity...you obviously missed that part completely!!
THE ONLY THING AROUND HERE THAT CONSTANTLY CURSES AND APPEARS TO BE CURSED IS A POSTER UNNAMED AND UNAMENDED, BUT EASILY SEEN!!!! I CERTAINLY DON'T KNOW-IT-ALL, BUT I GUESS FROM YOUR PERSPECTIVE IT LOOKS THAT WAY, SINCE YOU KNOW SO LITTLE ABOUT THE COMPANY WHERE YOU INVESTED SO POORLY IN THE PAST. TAKE RESPONSIBILITY FOR YOUR FAILURES, PTQ IS DOING JUST FINE!!!
