InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 5218
Posts 24047
Boards Moderated 5
Alias Born 09/20/2000

Re: thecrusher2011 post# 28119

Friday, 09/21/2012 9:31:49 AM

Friday, September 21, 2012 9:31:49 AM

Post# of 167964
thecrusher2011, with your NI 43-101 thought...

It doesn't have to be the same Geologist as I am sure you are aware of this. I explained why it won't matter here with SRGE especially in the post below to keep us from beating the same dead horse:
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=79745672

Still, let me help to make this even more simple to help you understand. Just remove your thoughts of the NI 43-101 for existing here. Why? Because it matters not with SRGE moving forward because as I had explained before... the company is in the process of completing their audited financials to file with the SEC to go to the OTCBB as what was PR-ed. The SEC does not and will not recognize any NI 43-101 because of only acknowledging Industry Guide 7 Standards:
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=79706048

Really, unless you are using to NI 43-101 to speculate from its data, it is really redundant to consider here with SRGE since SRGE is a US based company. The NI 43-101 would only have such significance only if SRGE was a Canadian based company since Canada acknowledges the NI 43-101. You cannot use your NI 43-101 points to discredit SRGE. They do not apply.

v/r
Sterling