InterDigital Inc (IDCC)

[techinvester]

cherry_pkr,

In your post #335096 “Here is some info that will sell IDCC.” you portended to be technically savvy expressing your opinion but were very vague providing references for your opinion. I was skeptical of your “perceived” knowledge relative to “a chip company”, "How the chip manufacturer solved their problem, I am not privileged to know. But I do know that 2 of the patents in th IDCC hoard has antenna solutions to this problem." and “There is a recent break thru in a patent held by Apple”. There are many new posters on this board. My goal of post# 335193 was to determine if you were providing value added content posts or just opinions not based on sound knowledge and/or facts. Your responses would also aid others in determining whether to read your posts or not.

I got the answer pretty clearly based on your post #335208 when you said you would provide the 2 IDCC patent #s (I tried to even make it easy for you by providing 2 patent links for your search) which you did not provide and followed up by your post #340542 a month later relative to the 2 patents where you stated “TechInvestor, The new patent law makes circumventing easy. I shall not comment on existing patents any more, for fear that I may unintentionally lead plagiarizers to go around existing IDCC patents. I find that to be a severe deficiency of the new law.” Just an FYI, InterDigital Applauds Historic Strengthening of U.S. Patent System http://ir.interdigital.com/releasedetail.cfm?ReleaseID=604395

The quote below also in post #340542 from my perspective is an oxymoron or poorly misguided at best. Most all that value the security of the U. S. would NOT post their security clearance level on a message board. J“I referenced my clearance to stress that I long USA, so people will know where I stand.”

By the way, I don’t know what “whole division” you are referencing was “severed” on May 3rd, 2005 when WM was appointed CEO (post 340461) but a response is not needed. Trying to make a point, bolster your opinion or provide value added information using “I saw a picture taken of Obama in Silicon Valley” or “my experience with another billionaire” or “My intensions are noble. So much so that that the US government awarded me a top secret clearance. Does that answer your curiosity?” provides no value added on this board or at least to me. JMHO

Just an FYI, ~1.4M TS clearances were active as of 10/1/2010. Robert Hansen and others of his ilk also held a TS clearance and were convicted of spying.