InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 60
Posts 5252
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 11/10/2009

Re: forreste1 post# 112637

Thursday, 09/02/2010 3:36:16 PM

Thursday, September 02, 2010 3:36:16 PM

Post# of 212244
forrest, my recent post details the answer to your question----why did SL do this???????

3 possible reasons

1.)he got all the pieces of the manufacturing and marketing pieces of the BioH puzzle put together, WITHOUT PL's involvement------this is the most plausible for a reasonable, educated and respected(prior to this mess) scientist to do this, coupled with a vague understanding of American contract laws. I researched about 20 patent cases where the inventor decided to go it alone, without their, then current "handlers"(PL & XMDC).... this case fits the profile. This reason also has the best "elements of proof" embedded in its defense, ONLY SL would have the "leading evidence" that shows the direct line of contact he would end up showing the court, wth him exclusively putting the "pieces" of the puzzle together. AS I SAID in that post, he got "hung up" with the APA and wants to renegotiate.

2.) He became nutso around December 2009

3.) I alluded to this reason in that prior post but refrained from sharing it, because it is very damaging and not based in ANY reports or research, but it is the ONLY 3rd reason out there----------the BioH promises/capability were all HYPE

NO OTHER REASONS EVEN GET CLOSE TO EXPLAINING WHY

excuse the butt-in on your conversation, but everyone is prematurely celebrating a mediation finish that has yet to even begin, not smart in my estimation, when PL put out his recent PR, he foolishly allowed the MM's to plot a quick run up(lasting 2 weeks) then a return to .006, with an easy $1M to make shorting XMDC, all because of the ill-timed PR.

NAME ONE CEO who has predicted a victory in a (30 days away nonetheless) MEDIATION, especially with the likely option of a court case to follow.

you know me, I'm all about managing expectations


SOP