InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 99
Posts 9699
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 10/22/2008

Re: Docsavag post# 75320

Thursday, 06/04/2009 11:17:03 PM

Thursday, June 04, 2009 11:17:03 PM

Post# of 729880
.... Dimon: "'Is' meant 'is' back in September, back then, but that was then and this is now and the money is in our bank so that 'is' may have been true then, but that's what we are hear to dispute, your honor. Clearly the money is in our possession and we have constituents who really want us to keep it. Since WMI doesn't have their banks any more anyway and they have been a big pain in the ass anyway, why not just let us keep the money? They don't have anything cool as us to do with it anyway. So, let's just say that 'is' is now a 'was' and based on this simple reasoning we can all agree that it was theirs. We are not disputing that. But, by the definition of the word 'was' the money is clearly no longer theirs. Who can disagree with this?"

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent COOP News