InvestorsHub Logo

Bag Holder No 672

06/04/09 11:30 PM

#75323 RE: Bizreader #75322

Sound reasoning for sure. JPM has this in the bag lol.

grey

06/04/09 11:36 PM

#75324 RE: Bizreader #75322

Weil will say but,Your Honor this is NOW so the was is JPM's.lol

Docsavag

06/04/09 11:56 PM

#75328 RE: Bizreader #75322

Biz, with such eloquence, you hereby win the set of legal briefs!

grandetourismo

06/05/09 12:37 AM

#75331 RE: Bizreader #75322

LOL!! biz very funny!

Did you know that later JPM tried to bring yet another motion trying to bring it here because as they said: "they weren't all there"?

Incidentally , regarding an earlier post, someone mentioned that I think it was some kind of CT shares or at least preferred that would not yield interest during the BAC case in NY that happened to be over some real estate/fake paper deals that had eventually wound up in Bof A's portforlio. Anyway, long story short, in that case the Judge ruled that even the shareholders that sold prior to the default, the shareholder would get full value from the otc price that was earned later by the defunct contractor who carried the original fake paper and sold it to the bank.

True story.


Is it happy hour yet?