InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 46
Posts 3467
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 07/21/2003

Re: 24601 post# 29400

Monday, 02/09/2004 12:05:42 PM

Monday, February 09, 2004 12:05:42 PM

Post# of 249131
24:

nope -- don't feel like looking it up & don't have it bookmarked. nobody bothered to respond to D&O, so there is wavoid precedent for such a non-response.

the last (insert whatever word you would prefer to characterize the DoD's non-acceptance of Wave's product) entry on the DoD page was many, many months ago (i think it exceeds Doma's self-imposed 6 month expiration date for all valid Wave data).

if not for "bugs" then what?

btw, do you consider it ethical for a company to load their official page w/"hidden text" to advance that same page up the google listings?

do you consider that "trustworthy" corp behavior?

edit: bargey - unfortunately the retainer seems to be worth less & less as every month passes...

you might disagree that there are significant similarities b/tw Wave & Silicon Film's story, but IMO there is some "past is prologue" that is worth carefully considering.

read the complaint filed against S.F. - you could almost cut & paste some of that stuff, change some names, dates, etc. & it'd be pertinent.

regards.

gotta go!




Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.