InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 1
Posts 21
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/15/2007

Re: 24601 post# 141601

Thursday, 04/19/2007 11:06:45 AM

Thursday, April 19, 2007 11:06:45 AM

Post# of 249238
a vested option is the same thing as share ownership. That is why the SEC requires the "beneficial ownership" clause. any options that vest within 60 days of the filing are considered shares. i.e. one could exercise them and make them full shares. Mgmt. may argue that many of their options are underwater so that they "deserve" to get grossed up as a future incentive. But this argument is not really fair in that if they get the stock to rise, then their existing options go in the money and have value. At the end of the day, options are just another form of compensation. If shareholders want to carve out a third of the company and give it to management and future employees, so be it. Its just an unusual (and not very good) deal for existing shareholders.


I do note that the shorting against the PP is an opinion built through conversations with lawyers and PIPE hedge funds. I do not know if it is true at WAVX. It is certainly a grey area with the SEC.

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.