Everlert Inc. (EVLI)

[Hi_Lo]

False reaper,

Sharp's objection to dismiss is right there in the image you posted! LOL!



SMH!

Plus there's this proving that Sharp just WON a judgement on Tuesday, August 9, 2022 in his objection to Blankenship's motion to dismiss:

https://www.washoecourts.com/Query/CaseInformation/CV21-00906

2. 2842 - Ord Denying Motion
08/09/2022
Extra Text: ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS AS MOOT - Transaction 9194593 - Approved By: NOREVIEW : 08-09-2022:08:31:49

So saying that Sharp didn't object to the motion to dismiss was false! Not only that, the judge just ruled in Sharp's favor! She denied Blankenship's motion to dismiss. The Custodianship case continues with Blankenship caught between a rock and a hard place...he's broke and doesn't have a lawyer and can't seem to be able to pay his attorneys (two attorneys in a month left because they didn't get paid).

Sharp is not seeking EVLI custodianship through the courts any longer. His letter to Blankenship, 2 months ago, clearly demonstrates that. The lack of any new court filings confirms it.

Say again? Lack of new court filings?! LOL! And since when does an email to the defendant close a court case? Sharp has to dismiss the case which he clearly hasn't since it's still open. Sharp reopened his case on May 1, 2022. He filed an objection to dismiss on May 24, 2022 which the judge just ruled in his favor on August 9, 2022!

Desperate EVLI shareholders have been "imploring" Sharp to "resume" litigation for custody. He clearly states he is against doing that.

Sharp has resumed litigation no matter what he says in his tweets. Sharp winning his objection to Blankenship's motion to dismiss proves it.

I selectively believe what Sharp says. I don't believe all his tweets. For example, Sharp said he wouldn't accept EVLI custodianship even if it was offered to him. I knew that was BS. His open and active court case and his letter to Blankenship clearly shows that not to be true.

Sharp also said he was dismissing the case on May 1, 2022 and broadcast it through twitter only to quietly re-open the case nine days later on May 10, 2022 (and not tweeting that he did so).

I have dismissed all litigation against the officers of $EVLI. While it is unquestionable that Blankenship & Harper were grossly in breach of their fiduciary duty to the shareholders, they are broke-ass & therefore, judgment-proof, until they next try to run their scam.

— George Sharp - Advocate for truth in the OTC (@GeorgeASharp) May 1, 2022

I have dismissed all litigation against the officers of $EVLI. While it is unquestionable that Blankenship & Harper were grossly in breach of their fiduciary duty to the shareholders, they are broke-ass & therefore, judgment-proof, until they next try to run their scam.
01 May 22

Again, if "Sharp is not seeking EVLI custodianship through the courts any longer" as you say, then why did he quietly re-open his case against EVLI on May 10, 2022? Why did he object to Blankenship's motion to dismiss on May 24, 2022? Why did he just have the judge rule in his favor concerning his objection to dismiss on August 9, 2022?

It is also silly for anyone to think that Sharp is negotiating with EVLI when his public statement clearly says that he would only take custody of EVLI in an unconditional surrender from Blankenship.

It's called an initial position/offer. There is always an intial position/offer, posturing and back and forth with negotiations. But after winning his objection to Blankenship's motion to dismiss yesterday, Sharp might not have to negotiate. Sharp has the upper hand now. Blankenship has no options or route to winning the court case. He's broke and can't hold on to a lawyer because he doesn't pay them.

Blankenship better get a lawyer soon. Time is money and court time is ticking. It must suck for Blankenship to be broke, stiffing two lawyers in a row. What lawyer will represent him now knowing that they won't get paid?

The new court docket entry yesterday showing the judge ruling in Sharp's favor proves my point. The court case is open and active with Sharp winning a judgement for his opposition to the defendant's motion to dismiss. Sharp's custodianship case against EVLI continues with Sharp in a position of strength and Blankenship broke and without a lawyer.

End of discussion.

https://www.washoecourts.com/Query/CaseInformation/CV21-00906

By the way how's Robert Myers doing? LOL!