InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 103
Posts 13754
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 01/23/2004

Re: pantherj post# 62844

Tuesday, 12/07/2021 10:03:10 AM

Tuesday, December 07, 2021 10:03:10 AM

Post# of 85155
Walther being broke has no bearing of being a good guy or a bad guy, just a broke guy.

Why not ask Walther how many attorneys he stiffed and, therefore, sought court permission to withdraw because of non-payment.



What has bearing is whether or not Scivoletto and Adelstein as former Directors did steal company secrets to start a clone company and if they did when did they put the plan in motion.

One has to look no further then Adelstein law suit, as stated in the law suit

- Scivoletto was one of only two individuals that voted for those shares.

- the newly voted preferred shares is why Adelstein claimed he was defrauded

- Adelstein claimed only one of those two people defrauded him, yet made Scivoletto a partner

Which leads to the question were they partners before the voting of the preferred shares and was the defrauding a premeditated plan to gain control of the assets of the company?

The law suit also states

- In June Scivoletto approached Adelstein and told him of the preferred shares

If Scivoletto thought those preferred shares were wrong , why did he vote for them.

Only two individuals voted for those preferred shares, if Scivoletto voted no there would be no preferred shares.

Was it a premeditated move?