Barrick DEFRAUDED a BUY and SELL contract with an unconstitutional "not serious price" in full constitutional contravention of the legal doctrine of the contract
a) Barrick did a UNILATERAL CONTRACT. Not allowed at law in Chile. That is in the category of "simulated and fase contract"
b) Barrick affixed a 10,000 pesos value to the contract, or less than paid to the Notary Public to condone and Notarized the 4 crimes 4 contracts, consecutive role numbers, date and time. Breach of contractual law.
c) Barrick forbid my Agent from "annexing new lands" I did it anyways my way 2011 when TSX decided to onstruct business and justice v. MWR
d) The OBLIGATIONS of a contract are LAW for the contracting parties, DOCTRINE OF THE CONTRACT Legislator Alessandri, Chilean Conmtractual law. hence Barrick must deliver to me MINA PASCUA constituted. or else JAIL.
e) As the most senior legal rights the first metallic mineral concession in the History of Chile, i did and can carve property form Barrick with full legal mining authority over and above my 8600 grandfathered hectares.
f) The 2006 Judgment still stands and was stolen in criminal fraud. Which will not be able to be reverted... CMN SpA owns TESOROS 2010.
It never did, it never will. Not even after O $ $ A was paud to lie. TESOROS is ordered to die, in its place AMARILLOS SUR and NORTE to revive. That Judgment shall be upheld.
g) At this date my mineral rights are alive 1996-2021.
