Anavex Life Sciences Corp (AVXL)

[XenaLives]

Yet that "toxic" financing has advanced the science, left the company without debt, and diluted stockholders less than the customary institutional financed funding devices.

Apparently that 2016 author was wrong and full of sour grapes:

"Unfortunately, these types of exciting speculative investments have burned me in the past. "

The author is a self styled investment guru - I believe this comment on his credibility is pretty accurate:

jfsmart
Comments307 | + Follow
Pump and Dump? Let's look at some of the Author's "hype". Last year, her urged his followers to "dump" ACAD as it had been taken to the "wood shed" and was way over priced. That was at $30/share and he disclosed he owned "Puts". Two months later, ACAD was close to $60. Great call! Or how about EYES, his "long" recommendation (and position) back in last May at around $9 or $10, convincing everyone it was going to $30. It's sitting at under $6 today, right? Another great miscalculation.
A couple other year ago "authoritative" predictions with positions from last March and May disclosures: Ya gotta love his "long" position and recommendations for CAPN at $6/shr with a knowledgable insight that it shoud be worth $10 to $20 shr by now, a year later. It's selling for $1.24. Or, how about hos long position and great recommendations for BIAD at 25 cents/sh. It's selling at around 3 cents, today.
I only read a half dozen or so of your posts available from Seeking Alpha. I had to stop, I was laughing so hard! What stood out, however, that in each of the articles I did view, you seemed totally focused on using this venue to slam or promote a stock in which you ALWAYS held. the other outstanding conclusion I drew, was that you were ALWAYS consistently WRONG in your projecctions and price predictions.
I guess there is something to be said for being consistent. It's very much like my experience in picking winners at the horse track. I'd spend hours reading tips and racing forms, but when it was all said and done, my wife asked me who I picked, and she bet against me- usually winning.
From reading your Bio, it appears you're still looking for a job. I don't think you'll get any offers based upon your stock-picking recommendation successes. I'd encourage you to rethink your messaging. Offer facts without a corresponding equity interest based on some original research, not other writer's promotional pieces already in publication. Offering self-serving, biased information is a waste of ink and offers little in the way of job appeal!

27 Apr 2016, 02:00 PM

https://seekingalpha.com/article/3967979-anavex-life-sciences-miracle-drug-toxic-financing-set-severe-decline-price


I'll stick with the science:
SPECIFIC INDICATIONS09/29/19
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=151418934

MOA and MEDICAL SCIENCE DISCUSSION 09/29/19
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=151418911

IP Protection:09/29/19
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=151418888

GUT and BRAIN - barrier and permeability 09/29/19
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=15141878