InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 31
Posts 1459
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/08/2012

Re: Lolaspike post# 161155

Monday, 05/08/2017 12:20:44 AM

Monday, May 08, 2017 12:20:44 AM

Post# of 235036
Lolaspike, I agree with most everything, except

SFOR pays 10% to ACS on sales of MobileTrust & GuardID since CSI (owned by ACS) purchased the patents for key encryption which ACS sells their own named product called Endpoint-lock


SFOR still owns the Patents on GID & MT, until such Time as ACS pays the $9M. Right now ACS still Pays SFOR.

Right on about the Royaltie$, that's were the Real Fun begin$.

That's why after the MSFT settlement, the real Marketing push came into to play, with Target last July followed by Staples, Office Depot, Office Max, Best Buy and as insert-text-here has mentioned in relation to Royaliies aspect of HSN. Whether the Settlements are for $10M or $100M, the past Royaliies owed owed is where the real Money is.

Not a consideration I have heard Mentioned, accept what Z has just Touched on when mentioning HSN, but I know he knows what the deal is when it comes to Royalties. Although Z may produce a Lot of DD, he still holds his cards close to his vest.

Another factor that plays in to the Settlement Amount from the Lawsuits is whether the Utility Patents are or considered as Software OT Telecommunication Patents. Looking at Ram Pemmaraju's Background as having spent 9 years as Chief Architect at Bell Labs..

I hoping the Patents are considered Telecommunications Patents, as that can make a difference in the Settlement Amounts by around $70M.

There are just a number of things thus far I have not seen brought up on the Board, at least since I began Posting. I too hold some cards close to the Vest. Which when I LOL at some of the absurdities I see posted by some, it's not just LOL, it's a real Belly Laugh.

I also see the Microsoft Settlement and its use of MFA as a Plus when it comes to the Companies in the current Suits as far Royalties also. The MSFT Settlement was worth far more than the $9.7M SFOR was paid, imo.

But then I guess I'm still suppose to be thinking inside the box, not Outside the Box, looking around.