InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 6
Posts 331
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/23/2014

Re: trades4ever74 post# 161153

Sunday, 05/07/2017 5:42:21 PM

Sunday, May 07, 2017 5:42:21 PM

Post# of 235052
Here is my take on this in regards to what SFOR and ACS receive in sales.

SFOR pays 10% to ACS on sales of MobileTrust & GuardID since CSI (owned by ACS) purchased the patents for key encryption which ACS sells their own named product called Endpoint-lock

ACS (or other resellers) pays SFOR 10% sales of ProtectID which they sell together with Endpointlock or separately to their clients.

Cygate is a new product that combines both the Out of Band Authentication patents (100% owned by SFOR) and CSI key encryption patents. So I assume sales of Cygate will get SFOR 5% of the sales if ACS developed Cygate. If SFOR developed it then more money for SFOR.

So let's say hypothetically ACS signs deals with both Endpointlock and Protect ID totally $1B, SFOR will get $50M.

Now you may gawk at the $1B deals but Cyber Security spending is projected to top $101B by 2020.

https://tradearabia.com/index.php?/touch/article/IT/324607

How much of that spending do you think are companies paying infringers of SFOR patents? IMO eventually these infringers will too be paying SFOR royalties not to mention Licensing fees.

I sure hope there is not a buyout and Kay just retire a multi millionaire and let SFOR continue to rake in the money and you never know pay its shareholders a dividend.

Go SFOR!