Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Doone,
This thing really does work. I got the opportunity to test one last year. There are a huge amount of organic farms in the US that will grab this in a heart beat.
Notice the two obscure announcements in two days. These appear to be prep for the AMEX listing.
Hi John,
You are right about the website. An LLC was put together to retail the allay patch. The LLC has no affiliation with Biel except for the fact that the items are purchased through them.
All the partners are BIEL shareholders who expect a profit from the sales of product and an increase in share price of BIEL because of profit to BIEL off the product we move.
The web site is seeing a lot of hits and sales although slow, are beginning to pick up.
I spent over $65,000 for legal fees (over half a million went in in total) to try and solve the problem.
Yes, I would have gotten paid back if it worked.
It is time for you to put up some money to help us all.
And yes, I was sequestered. Order a transcript then you can talk from knowledge.
doinit,
Sorry, but there are 249+ million outstanding and Joe is creating prefered shares that convert to another 250. He is selling off the assets and stealing the money.
If you want to type, you would be better off typing your senator to get the SEC of thier ass.
Lou
Spunky,
Your analogy isn't correct in this situation.
This is closer to the real situation:
Your child is in the hospital, dying. Without an operation it will die and your insurance won't cover it and your in debt.
Friends comes to your aid and put up hundreds of thousands of dollars to pay for the operation. But alas, the child dies anyway.
Now you want to sue those people because thier help didn't succeed.
Lou
Dragonman will be sadly missed. He is probably the only one of us all who kept his sense of humor through it all.
I wish he could kick Joe in the nuts too. But I'm sure they will be stationed in two very different places.
Lou
John,
You won't get anything from the court records as the judgement was oral. It will only be in the transcript.
Lou
No, not forbidden to speak. Sequestered means that I was kept in a different room so that i could not hear the testimoney. I saw none of the trial.
Level of dishonesty? The Smith group is very honest. Which is why they are having trouble with Joe.
I have no idea what bdgr is pumping, I am not an officer, director, or employee of bdgr. Only Joe knows, and he isn't saying.
Lou
Yes, I was present though I was sequestered.
I am not the official spokes person for BDGR and if I were, I would not be issuing pr's here. I also cannot speak for Mr. Smith. The only thing I know is, I have met him and believe him to be honest and honorable.
The court info is public, any can post it.
Metrolane,
Though the legality of the preferred A was always in question.
It expired in Dec. of 2007. Joe tried to file a renewal in Delaware, but you can't use one of your three wishes to ask for three more wishes.
The board is deadlocked. Smith/Kelsoe vs. Lanza/Neely.
The only officers are: Smith pres, Kelsoe COO, Neely secr.
That is the way it will stay until another shareholders meeting or the board as a group votes to fill the empty seats.
Lou
LMG,
Is what true?
Lou
Caddo,
Do you have a link to that?
Lou
John,
Yes, like a kidney stone.
Lou
Because Ed was using my work computer again.
Lou
Snowcrow,
Though this deal is extremely important to the shareholders for obvious reasons. It is not company business. This is a contract between lanza and smith only. It is not something that the board of directors can control. And the only material event that can be PR'd would be the transfer of lanza's stock, as it is over 5% of outstanding.
Lou
Snowcrow,
I don't know, but yesterday wouldn't have been soon enough.
Lou
options_fool,
Sorry that I haven't been to the board in some time. I was on vacation all last week and busy catching up at work since.
I do own the name BDGROIL.COM and the site. I purchased it last year when we took over as directors. However I have passed it along to the controllers of the company.
Lou
Snowcrow,
They did communicate through the web site. I'm not sure why no one noticed the wonderful thing they did for the shareholders.
They were to get the super voting preferred in this deal, but instead they cancelled it. Giving control back to the shareholders.
Lou
Kenco,
You are little confused. The board of bar overseers must investigate and notifiy the attorney of every complaint. The more the complaints, the more they investigate. And, yes, as shareholders, Frohling did work for us. Even if he did not, his actions have hurt the shareholders and are thus scrutinized by the BOBO.
Lou
LMG,
Mine went out.
I know marsnvest just filled his out.
Lou
Kenco,
If you could right a better complaint, have at it.
Lou
Options_fool,
Frohling has been keeping the PR account hostage, so that the new board and president cannot put out PRs. He is also aiding Joe in his illegal activities.
Lou
Time to show that the shareholders have a voice too.
I have filled out a complaint form for the ethics comm. of New Jersey.
You can go to this location for the form
http://www.cameraturret.com/form.pdf
You only need to fill out your name and info if you feel than my complaint is similar to yours.
Here is where to send it.
Seth Ptasiewicz, Esq., Secretary
Hall of Records
465 Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Boulevard
Room 308
Newark, New Jersey 07102
973-622-6107
Lou
kenco,
On the contrary, I thought the posts were very concise, to the piont, and truthfull.
I'll through in .25. Oh no, that is 5+ shares, maybe not.
I am sure that is no surprise.
Lou
I believe that Sonrus only lists operators. Since BDGR does not operate any of the wells, there would be no production reports for BDGR.
Lou
LMG,
Did you get my phone number?
Lou
LMG, Check your inbox and call me.
Lou
Lanzamustgo,
Yes, I remember. We are distant cousins and you are the cousin of a friend of mine.
Those wells are only 8" or so in diam. You would have to puree him first.
Lou
BDGRshareholder,
A 15 year old kid could run bdgr cash flow positive at $130 oil.
Sit back and enjoy the ride.
Lou
Kenco,
You read the PR. You heard the explaination of how directors are seated and unseated according to deleware law.
My guess is that Joe and Tom are there for transitional purposes only.
But all guessing aside the facts are:
3 board seats against 2.
JL is no longer in control of BDGR.
Also, if you would like to set all conspiracy theorys to rest you can call and talk to me and Ed (marsinvest) at my shop, 781.294.4110.
Lou
Sword, and others,
Joe does not have a controlling interest and that is not how these people were seated on the board.
Directors may vote to fill seats at any directors meeting, once seated only a shareholder vote can remove them. This is how I was installed and why he couldn't remove me when he found out I would not play his game.
So it appears that, the board (Tom and Joe) voted to fill three seats with the new board members. It should now take a shareholders vote to remove them. So Joe no longer has control.
And who said that Frohling is the corp attorney? I didn't see that in the PR.
Lou
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHH!!
Lou
Snowcrow,
There is a difference between a pumper and a shareholder. A shareholder has hopes and dreams about thier company as they are a part owner.
Sometimes, as in the past, those hopes and dreams are dashed by unforeseen circumstances or as in this case, corrupt officers. In those times many shareholders including John and myself have brought those terrible things to light in this forum.
Lou
John 19-35,
Congradulations on becoming the moderator of the BDGR board. I sense the improvement in integrity of the board already and have installed it to my browser opening page again.
Thanks for taking on this task.
Lou
And the massive PR's were done to allow the purchaser of the 225 million shares to sell short.
Breez,
They just cut your equity possition more than in half.
A conv. debenture would be a loan than can convert to stock at usually a much higher price than market. So that means that you get the money now and turn that into shares later at far fewer than you would now. Thus diluting less.
The reason that investors would want the debenture is that it gives them a first in line holding should the company go belly up.
Jan,
No one would take the stock if they had a no short provision. This is the way it is always done.
Eventually they will reverse the stock and do it again and again.
If anyone has someone in china, I would check to see if there even is any such stores.