Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Yes we can dream but far from being realistic, I mean super we will be getting tons of new shares within the new group at Intel.....say maybe in 3 plus years from now, oh well this is still a worth looking at to pass time.
https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/newsroom/biographies/biography-sandra-l-rivera.html
____________________________________________________________
SANTA CLARA, Calif., Oct. 3, 2023 – Intel Corporation today announced its intent to separate its Programmable Solutions Group (PSG) operations into a standalone business. This will give PSG the autonomy and flexibility it needs to fully accelerate its growth and more effectively compete in the FPGA industry, which serves a broad array of markets, including the data center, communications, industrial, automotive, aerospace and defense sectors. Intel also announced that Sandra Rivera, executive vice president at Intel, will assume leadership of PSG as chief executive officer; Shannon Poulin has been named chief operating officer.
Standalone operations for PSG are expected to begin Jan. 1, 2024, with ongoing support from Intel. Intel expects to report PSG as a separate business unit when it releases first-quarter 2024 financials. Over the next two to three years, Intel intends to conduct an IPO for PSG and may explore opportunities with private investors to accelerate the business’s growth, with Intel retaining a majority stake.
The two companies will remain strategically aligned, including continuing PSG’s relationship with Intel Foundry Services (IFS), as they work together to address key areas of the FPGA market. Building on PSG’s highly successful Supply Resilience program pilot, the relationship with IFS will also uniquely enable PSG to give customers greater predictability of supply aligned to their needs, ensuring a more resilient supply chain.
“Our intention to establish PSG as a standalone business and pursue an IPO is another example of how we are consistently unlocking more value for our stakeholders. This will give PSG the independence it needs to keep growing share in the FPGA market, differentiating itself with capacity and supply resilience from IFS, and allowing Intel product teams to focus on our core business and long-term strategy,”
__________________
Oh well, what the heck!....if both sides fought tooth and nail maybe we might be now considered as private investors? Why does HDC seem to always get into the strangest positions with generally no positive results?...or could this be????
https://www.flightaware.com/photos/view/12176-abb8b4d21b0342cf8f807dc02b182ca7b9e76e23 I'm just killing time anyways this is Dr. Dent's actual plane. Dr. Dent knows how to get around when he needs to.
I use FlightAware for tracking jets and actually tracked my wife flying in a B737M 8 from East Coast to PHX last Monday, anyways it is a nice flight tracker. Control tower sites and software are at hand and also cool to listen to.
Gary over on Yahoo is correct he can move part or all his shares from a IRA to a ROTH however he will not be able to reverse what he moves nor take any future tax loss from that ROTH account. With HDC in a bucket he could easily move a million or two million shares of HDC with no problem but he most likely moved share to the ROTH while some worth in trading existed. I do wonder how the tax conversion aspects worked with this small amount if any.
Remember he already has a IRA so it isn't like he is "contributing funds" to the IRA he is just moving stock but what is the determining worth because he still may need to pay taxes or conversion costs.
Now I'm only going to place this link referencing the trademark in which use the following number 90849055 and dig as you please. https://tsdr.uspto.gov/
As for the recent press release my hope is that Dr. Dent is working with one of the following Algorithm Engineers.... John M. Ganci Jr., Martin Keen or Jeremy Fox. There is no way that Dr. Dent would be able to merge the needed algorithm himself, not a chance in a million years. I am also in hopes that he is pursuing both provisional and non provisional ARI patent mixes. Another need if he is really thinking big time is a fact that he must also apply for an International Patent but down deep realistically he/we might be better served to license patents from other players. I mean we are years behind others. We also since our 10-k filing for 2022 have fallen in what is stated from O'Leary/Dr. Dent material weakness in Internal controls. Now how much deferring of and moving figures around might help we need a break or infusion of money. We can only think positive just so long. With a proven Algorithm Engineer they would know what they can mix and develop into the patent so it doesn't get denied from the USPTO as being just another Algorithm patent application. As this moves HLYK forward into the field of vision from other existing AI patent players and that is when infringement ears start to open and take notice. This is why it is so important for the patent engineering process and patent legal team.
Another thing to consider on why HDC will wind up because no Interim CEO...I doubt sincerely that "Laurie Vennwest" himself or anyone in his circle will raise their hand either.
HealthLynked
https://investors.healthlynked.com/presstype/healthlynked-announces-patent-filing-for-ari-a-revolutionary-ai-powered-healthcare-interface/
Key Features of ARI
ARI’s key features include the following:
Interactive Medical Profile Creation: ARI will enable users to interactively create their medical profiles within the HealthLynked Network. Patients can converse with ARI as if they are speaking to a nurse or doctor, making the data input process more intuitive and engaging.
Multilingual Capabilities: Recognizing the diverse linguistic needs of patients worldwide, ARI is equipped to converse in multiple languages, ensuring that language is never a barrier to quality healthcare.
Customizable Avatar: To enhance the user experience, ARI offers a customizable avatar feature. Patients can choose the gender, ethnicity, and appearance of their ARI avatar, ensuring a more personalized and comfortable interaction. Whether you prefer speaking to a male or female avatar, or one that reflects your ethnicity, ARI has got you covered.
Integration with HealthLynked Network: Seamlessly integrated with the HealthLynked Network, ARI ensures a comprehensive view of a patient’s medical history, optimizing healthcare recommendations.
Good morning King.....we all know anything that HDC touches seems to always end up in a gutter but I doubt any of the players took the money and ran. First they are far too old to run and our legal team has a positive reputation but with that said it doesn't mean that we are going to have a happy ending.
I can't help but to think actually I'm sure that Mrs McGovern doesn't want anything to do with HDC meaning she has control depending upon any trust that our CEO may have had and of course he must have. Now with that she most likely explained to her daughter that she wants this mess over with as it has stressed the family to no end plus I lost my husband. She either gave her daughter (Colleen) or attorney's control/permission to end all this since my belief is that settlement discussions between HDC and Intel had been taking place in the last few months when George's health turned far worse than in the months prior. I doubt with all this in mind that it was an easier and workable task for Intel and HDC to come together and agree to end this matter. I see possibly at the most (if at all) $25 million agreement referencing the patents only. Then HDC could end ASAP...BASICALLY! (why???) simply because if Intel were to buy the entire company it would take almost a year to resolve so just buying the remaining portfolio HDC can finally close and Intel resolved what they wanted as they finally have that patent which they were once felt it was theirs. Remember with each company it sends a message to shareholders and other corporations on the power of Intel and strength of a company that wasn't even a mom and pop business.
My thoughts lead to an 8-K once (possibly) money changes hands where HDC will make the announcement of winding up. For those who think HDC will still be a company after even a huge settlement are just dreaming and have no clue at just how tired HDC has become however there is the issue with Vennwest which I believe is even bigger than possibly Intel meaning what will Vennwest offer and I'm not talking about money. I thought the Vennwest would have backed away since the end of the legals involving HDC and Intel. I am confused on why Veenwest didn't stop their pursuit however maybe they just want a hand out and nothing more before HDC makes an announcement or 8-k filing but will state again HDC is done.
This is positive news Nice post, initially this sounds positive depending how it was written and the various avenues it may work/merge with the first patent and of course future patents. My hope is that Dr. Dent refined the first patent since and incorporated new writings.
Charles...the SEC has backed up away from doing this for some time. These pinksheet corporations know this and I'm sure Marty was fully aware of what was coming but he (Marty) was able to pay additional years referencing Geogia Corporation for HDC. My point referencing the SEC is that they are also punishing HDC with no public traders. Now look at this as a person or entity that has no investment in HDC.
GB....Investors relations at Intel is most likely the wrong department to contact but may you have INTC stock.
Tim... your response from Intel most likely computer / automated replay.
Speedo .... you have the right to sue anyone for any reason but generally not with empty pockets Maybe pro-bono?
Someone please explain to those on the HDC Yahoo board that the PTAB did not go to bat for HDC the PTAB Director was attacked by Intel
On another area involving talk about the SEC....yes the rule sucks but understand that the SEC had to set rules somewhere to stop these corporations. You as a shareholder have the right to complain directly with the SEC and their attorney's will talk with you and explain what you need to do as to what forms to fill out and a documentation tail that you tried to make direct contact with HDC and got no results however, being on the expert exchange I'm sure you are barking at a legal "wall" that won't move. Do understand HDC isn't (in my thoughts) legally responsible nor is expected to file any documents within the expert market. Now getting back to the SEC let's say HDC files "all their back SEC files" and that brings them up to date THEY STILL WILL NOT BE ABLE TO TRADE SHARES AS THE OTC REQUIRES ADDITIONAL WORK/HOOPS THAT HDC MUST DO. HDC MUST ALSO FIND A MM THAT WILL BACK HDC AND CITADEL CAN NOT DIRECTLY HELP BECAUSE THE RULES INVOLVED STATES NO MARKET MAKER THAT HAS AN INVESTMENT IN HDC CAN PROVIDE FOR (HDC). IT MUST BE A DIFFERENT MARKET MAKER THAT IS WILLING TO "GUARANTEE" all the i' s are dotted and t' s crossed to state the least...for a lack of better words.
Majority owners? are you talking about Health Discovery's BOD?
I do find it hard to understand how any investors, regardless of any successful settlement would believe HDC would have any future. Those shares that our CEO had will go to his wife and with all the past medical plus age we are done done and sincerely done but my hope that when HDC does windup in the near future that we may at least break even. The 20 plus years of BS involving so many directors and deals we throw away due to lack of business knowledge just sucks....< internal directors fighting. As to our patent you know exactly which one which will expire in 2025. All patents basically run their full course if 18 years and beyond that it just isn't worth pursuing. Now in HDC case we were always body blocked and I believe most of the damage was done by our own management. No company in their right mine would snap up the 2-3 US patents and 3-4 foreign patents.
Alan...yes I see them "if anything" selling the patents but it must be all the remaining patents in order for HDC to finally close it's doors. I am pretty sure that there is no way in hell HDC will continue regardless of whatever money from Intel. HDC is as tired of a company that it can be regardless of any settlement in any amount!!
Charles over in Yahoo.....
10 minutes ago
We need that 8-K, as there are still too many variables at play to solve this equation. If we could plug in some values for some of those variables, the equation could be more easily solved. Could the Insiders/heirs just take the money and run, and exclude the shareholders? No, not if there was a settlement with Intel, as that would open them up to a class action. But it seems that, according to the terms of a loan to HDC some years ago, the patents were put up as collateral, which meant that, in the event of bankruptcy, the patents would become the property of the lienholders. However, bankruptcy is off the table if there was a settlement. I only see three possible outcomes:
1.) Either HDC is declaring bankruptcy and closing up shop for good, which would only happen if our attorneys had not been able to identify enough damages to warrant a continuation of the lawsuit. In this scenario, everyone loses.
Outcome 2.) A settlement was reached with Intel, but HDC plans to close up shop and divvy up the proceeds to their attorneys, the IRS, and finally to the shareholders in the form of dividend checks. A better outcome for everyone.
Outcome 3.) A settlement was reached with Intel and HDC plans to re-open its doors, start trading again and signing new licensing agreements. The best outcome for everyone.
Take your pick, but I'm guessing it's outcome #3, because I don't think that #1 is as plausible as #2, which is less plausible than #3 (look at the 8-K from 7-5-23. It shows intention).
___________________
Charles I would love option number 3 but not a chance in this world. You didn't figure in the "Mrs. McGovern" factor, I'm sure she just wants this to end and end quickly. The past pain watching her husband coupled with age is what I see as a huge negative factor resulting in very little "if anything" for us investors. Also worth mentioning Directors "expects" to make an announcement regarding an interim successor for Mr. McGovern in the near future.
The word "expects" is in the all disclaimers under foreword looking statements.
You know it was sad when we lost our CEO and they had to produce an 8-K but when hundreds of Investors get slaughtered for many years there seems to be no sympathy to shed a tear... I mean an 8-K filing
"Good Sport"...you can ask "DigDeeper" if he sees any but other than constantly checking for documents to be filed at SEC I have no intent of spending any more money on this sad ass company.
No problem but they need to cut us loose instead of the BS nothing. As for any "class action" that is a joke what in hell is wrong with some of these investors? Who wants to throwing more money away. I just want them to make some type of filing/statement...this alias is tired of posting here.
This is just F'in pathetic, stop the damn suffering!
Sir John T...you have me smiling about the "Karma" words you used over on yahoo yet we have been getting our heads kicked in by HDC Karma for 2 decades! so does Karma give a crap? nope!
I love reading pay attorneys with stock? I don't think they would fall into the dumb and dumber mode like some shareholders however pay them with Intel shares oh yes! but that isn't going to happen unless they are really working for Intel?
King...we can't even get them to produce an 8-k. Maybe you should
phone Board member William F. Fromholzer at his home. He
seems to know how to produce an 8-k but maybe short term memory
relapsed kicked in.
YankeesFanInOhio....an 8-k needs to justify the latest moves by HDC. All this is really starting to smell.
The discovery time hence both case (Texas) was basically agreed upon so maybe they just couldn't find enough or produce a damage report,
Between Intel and HDC we get what?..........
This isn't going to end pleasantly for shareholders, no way in hell!
Alan...probably so but as we have talked prior I believe nothing to write home to mom about. I believe the HDC curse won another round referencing Intel...probably the damage report. Had we settled with something substantial I believe Vennwest suit would have settled/ceased.
Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough LLP
https://www.nelsonmullins.com/professionals/lee-wedekind#main
https://www.bestlawyers.com/lawyers/lee-d-wedekind-iii/217079
Georgia Court yesterday........The parties appeared before the Court for the continuance of a mediation. The Court directed Plaintiff to give their best, reasonable offer to the Defendant within two weeks, then Defendant is given two weeks to respond. Afterwards, the parties are to notify the Court within 30 days as to whether or not they are going forward with discovery and depositions. The parties will reconvene before the Court on October 26, 2023, at 11:00
Now within this our Attorney was representing all of HDC directors but Colleen was actually online during the ZOOM meeting as well as Laurie Venning
Under normal circumstances we should see the HDC/Veenwest court documents from Georgia on the 3rd day which is this Friday between 2 and 3 pm....document number 71.
Sir John T.... Mrs McGovern lost her husband and no doubt maybe HDC was an avenue that once George enjoyed while his health wasn't so demanding but look at the years we have been fighting Intel, The stresses along the way within the McGovern household coupled with age and failing health issues states clearly that once George had pasted Mrs. McGovern expressed to Colleen that she was tired and wanted all this to end ASAP.
Not one persons foot stumbled into being a Interim CEO yet, we all including myself are looking for a bigger paycheck than what seems logical. At $25-$75 million dealing with buying the patent portfolio the company could be easily windup with some cash to be distributed. You figure the truth being we should have filed bankruptcy many years ago it was George who kept us alive.
Intel and so many other corporations have found ways around HDC and have supersize their own patents. I had hopes that the SVM-RFE was flashed in certain XEON chips and so forth giving us a huge pay day but since the agreement as we all know Intel would have supplied another rebuttal on October 6th, with that it appears an on going agreement for far less money was snatched in an instant by both parties. Neither party wanted to pursue the court in the first place so who in the HDC family might of cut the string? ..... so ask yourself and again you don't see Colleen wanting to be interim CEO do you? Mrs. McGovern can never be nor expected to be responsible for any of this regardless what anyone may every think.
It would seem if Intel were to buy the remaining patent portfolio for an amount much larger than their worth $25-$75 million that would enable HDC to be nothing more than a worthless shell (kinda worthless now : ( With no patents or products HDC would normally deal with our attorneys to state the least and then remaining money would pay insider and other loans then the company would normally wind up. Attorneys would again gain money in this process but remaining monies would trickle down.
If Intel buys the entire company which may take far too long to do and to be dealt with then we would benefit in the end verses if Intel just buys our patent portfolio...they must buy the remaining portfolio which has an additional 3-4 foreign patents along with 2-3 US patents totaling about 7 or 8 if I recall.
I can pretty much assume that Mrs. McGovern is done with this mess so I would believe the patents portfolio is sold for real cheap to pay at least attorneys and pay a few cents or so to us investors after all expenses. This company has been the walking dead for years but what the heck our hands are stretched out for all the money that falls from the Intel coffers that Attorneys and Insider can't grab as it falls.
I sure would love 1 Intel share for every 100 HDC shares I hold.
Talk about getting old???? anyways I just now recall BQ stated that HDC/Veenwest agreed to administratively close this case with leave to reopen. So as most know it is just settlement conferences unless no agreement is reached? I mean I realized this was conferences to settle but had no clue the case was closed until I checked the 5/25/23 minute sheet however even in PACER it states it was closed and now reading the minutes from 5/25/23 the lights just got turned on....hey, you gotta be able to laugh at yourself along with others that may laugh at you.
So at any rate we will see documentation referencing these continuing conferences but seems to me today they should be able to finish crossing the " t " 's and dot their " i " 's
So still we shall see at least 1 more document which will be # 71 Pacer https://ecf.gand.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/iqquerymenu.pl?280274 within 3 business days but might be sooner.
Georgia ZOOM meeting....I got this many months ago on another message board and when I did try this access "didn't work".
ID 161 383 3464
Pass 928374
Let hope after the ZOOM Court session today between HDC and Veenwest that we might be able to see more of the puzzle a bit more clearly. Even if the issues have been resolved I suspect Veenwest will still address the Court.
I just checked the court for the next document in this case and see nothing yet but know it will be document number 71.
I love what Charles is posting over in the other message board and keep bring posts over but gotta tell you Mrs. McGovern is either really disturbed with HDC or Intel. One needs to look at her age and what was important in their family. So the patents probably sold but doubt the entire company.
Intel's Federal case was about what? It was about the USPTO not HDC.
I do like what "Charles" posted over on Yahoo referencing what "Nonya" was expressing.
Thank you for your enthusiastic response, Nonya. There are two possible explanations for the sudden dismissal with prejudice, although you only are only willing to cite one. It is possible that HDC's attorneys got to the discovery phase, saw that there was not enough in damages to warrant a continuation of the lawsuit, and therefore dismissed it with prejudice. I give you that. IT IS ALSO POSSIBLE that some sort of an agreement (a settlement, if you will) was reached between the parties, that this agreement was signed by both parties, that this agreement was signed before the dismissal, AND that a nondisclosure clause was a part of this agreement. I am thus asserting that a settlement was reached BEFORE the dismissal, not AFTER (as you inferred). Therefore, it is entirely plausible that, although a settlement had been reached, the exact terms of the settlement were NOT to be disclosed publicly, pending the finalization of certain pending factors, like Venning. You seem to be stuck on only one possible explanation, when I can identify two, with the latter being the more likely (in my opinion). By the way, what is your background? I'm just curious.
I must say I doubt HDC gained anything over $25 million and will make an announcement after the 9/26/23 meeting. We will be closing folks nothing left in this company in all directions. People also forget about Mrs. McGovern and how she feels.
While we are all beating the bushes in different message thread it seem possibly Intel did indeed Infringe but how could HDC prove any damages unless we had sales or licensing with those very same patents prior. Did ever (aside from NEO) ever figure out from prior licensing experience what damages might parallel to determine this? I'm sure I'm all wet but just trying to touch on possible problems that were missed in the damage report that our Attorneys could not prove but I'm finding hard to believe our attorney's didn't already have this prepared I mean for them to walk or submit a infringing report without damages would have been suicide. I also believe even if actually especially if Intel was in a bind with what HDC submitted that Intel surely would have replied on the future October 6 rebuttal date. I'm now wondering if something happened at the Federal level where the USPTO, HDC and Intel agreed to back away from this case
It sure is looking like another weekend without any food stamps.
Sir John T...you did see Alan81 post days ago correct?
Good question and it seems like historically if INTC announces something it is
over a couple hundred million or so. Agreements and settlements less than that
might show up in the 10Q, which we won't see until late October.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=172848393
I would not want to be even thinking that far below the belt line but all us red hair step children need a few bread crumbs from the Intel/HDC dinner table.