InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 16
Posts 3151
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 11/09/2006

Re: None

Friday, 10/20/2023 8:52:36 AM

Friday, October 20, 2023 8:52:36 AM

Post# of 18404
Is it really that hard to see that the strong possibility that HDC could not provide enough evidence within the "Discovery Phase" that they had to settle as per agreement Why should Intel even pay out any monies to HDC? it would seem that some evidence may have been partly evident but not enough to wager in a trial. Maybe couple that with the thought that HDC has pending weakness in every possible area of business plus the inability to move forward but has other liabilities to pay to also windup the company.

For those that might think HDC had a super tight case why settle for a measly $2 million? Let me just say if we had the true evidence within the discovery phase we would have not settled therefore Intel would have rebuttal extremely intense but none of this happened in other words even if HDC plastered Intel with massive evidence Intel still would have come back at least one more time to rebut their side long before court and also had the pressure of been real HDC would have settled for more money not to say hundreds of millions but maybe $10 to $25 million.

We have been a sad case throughout our history have we not? why change a perfect score, yes so sad!