The more assumptions you have to make, the more unlikely an explanation is.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
OMER- Acceptance with Priority Review and JPM link:
https://investor.omeros.com/news-releases/news-release-details/biologics-license-application-narsoplimab-hsct-tma-accepted
https://investor.omeros.com/archived-events
OMER- Acceptance with Priority Review and JPM link:
https://investor.omeros.com/news-releases/news-release-details/biologics-license-application-narsoplimab-hsct-tma-accepted
https://investor.omeros.com/archived-events
Linking back to the Centripetal vs Cisco case. I knew Cisco had decided to appeal but started wondering to who? I was assuming that was the appeal.
Anyway longish story short C vs C only took 2 years!
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/16911679/centripetal-networks-inc-v-cisco-systems-inc/?filed_after=&filed_before=&entry_gte=&entry_lte=&order_by=asc#entry-189
They did have a Markman Hearing on 2/6/2020 and we can see how rapidly the settlement was achieved... "Opinion Ordered".
"Cisco said it will appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. Nov 30, 2020"
Centripetal has a long way to go if Cisco held back an ability to challenge their patent(s)(?)
Oops here is the 2nd 4 I meant to post yesterday:
https://www.otcmarkets.com/filing/html?id=14622682&guid=ND_KUnIyAUfmvth
Here is the 2nd one I thought I was posting yesterday:
https://www.otcmarkets.com/filing/html?id=14622682&guid=ND_KUnIyAUfmvth
My take on these "free" shares: CEO salary $790K, CFO $424K they both sell shares to beef up their income. This process has been a long haul. I know of bio CEO's (also long hauls) $MMs in salaries + MMs in "free" shrs + going into debt and diluting to pay those salaries with no approved drug or approved drug does not live up the expectations. I'm not unhappy about the form 4s and I look at the 4 yr time span for CEO payout as a good sign.
When the uspto publishes the recertification (supposed to be about 2 weeks as uspto already posted "sent to publishing") they are free to file for Stay lift. The stock has been slowly climbing since the covid crash followed by some sideways.
I sure miss emojis when on this sight.
The inter partes reexamination certificate will set forth the results of the proceeding and the content of the patent following the reexamination proceeding. The certificate will:
(A) cancel any patent claims determined to be unpatentable;
(B) confirm any patent claims determined to be patentable;
(C) incorporate into the patent any amended or new claims determined to be patentable;
(D) make any changes in the description approved during reexamination;
(E) include any statutory disclaimer or terminal disclaimer filed by the patent owner;
(F) identify unamended claims which were held invalid on final holding by another forum on any grounds (e.g., by checking Box 9 "Other" on form PTOL-2068 and describing the status and Box 16 "Other" on the examiner’s checklist form PTO-1516);
(G) identify any patent claims not reexamined;
(H) be mailed on the day of its date to the patent owner at the address provided for in 37 CFR 1.33(c), and a copy will be mailed to the requester; and
(I) refer to patent claims, dependent on amended claims, determined to be patentable. https://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/pac/mpep/s2688.html#:~:text=Since%20abandonment%20is%20not%20possible,been%20concluded%20by%20vacating%20the
I think if you go back and read your justification, you will admit to, at least, assuming something untrue. And if wise you will thank the board for sharing their hard won DD.
No what I said was:
...every seller sold for their own reason(s) which are numerous unknown and unknowable (in there entirety).
No it doesn't, it reflex's a correction from a run from under .50. Said with the caveat that every seller sold for their own reason(s) which are numerous unknown and unknowable (in there entirety).
When I look at the one year daily chart there has been a (rocky) steady up trend since last spring. It also shows pps was in an uptrend off of .20 when covid hit. Pps went sideways for awhile then rebounded hard to .80's
It has been making higher lows and last week new high since middle of June 2019. The higher lows and new highs over 7 months is very bullish. The odds of a settlement with G are very strong. They lost and they lied to the very court that will be handling the settlement phase.
So what are we waiting for? Procedure, procedure, procedure all about the court and as those procedures get ticked off the list higher lows and higher highs will hold. It will probably continue to be volatile but we will see it slope up. And of course the risk is an unexpected delay.
1 yr NLST
Hong’s name is nowhere to be found on the claim rejection. Thanks for sharing gftb!
I don’t try to pick a bottom. I by dips if possible but also add higher if the stock is undervalued. It is conceivable that at some point $5 will be a buy.
Most negative thoughts on the pps right now are designed to create instability in shr price, that is, an investor’s conclusion on value.
Nice call!
That was a great bullish move this AM. Hope some on the board were able to add the dip!
Good news! Fundamentals will continue to improve.
Too many pieces lol I have updates for case txwd-6:2020-cv-00525 but don't recognize '218, '595, and '523. So thanks for clearing that up.
I thought hynix just lost on appeal. What is the difference between the recent loss and the jury trial in 2021. Thank-you
In pre-market pps hit .8999.
YES! Many many investors know that there are now 2 companies that must pay.
100% up in wins on appeals.
That's a good point, you are thinking ahead a few moves. What I like about the idea is it gives g a vested interest in the company. But on the face of it I like big cash and royalties better. :) What does Hong want?
NLST 1/7/21 won another case (hynix) in appeal.
I misunderstood your statement, sounded like scotus had rejected an appeal by g, wondered if I missed something. I knew/thought that g had declined to take it to scotus.
there was huge news in november no g to scotus, lately recert sent to printer and now ks lost appeal! all this is $$$$ kinda news.
well seems to me this 907 is where 912 (google) was last june. do they have the option to take it to scotus?
probably....will they? no, but they will drag their feet? probably. what i don’t know....are there conditions the preclude a lost federal appeal from filing to be heard at scotus?
i wish somebodies would take a few educated guesses at how much ks could be on the hook for.
here is another explanation although changes nothing about
which patent and who won the appeal from another board:
Looks like the ITC hearing which was reversed by the ITC Commission did not include claims 40 & 41 of the '907 :public-inspection.federalre...
So we had originally won claims 40 & 41 of the 907': s3-us-west-1.amazonaws.com/...
no that link is for patents 218 and 595. this win on 1/7/2021 is patent 907. NLST had lost and given up but turns out it is a win on appeal. the uspto defended NLST last 2 claims 40 and 41
nicely done! short story ks lost on appeal (same as google)
NLST needs more negotiators
why 1-1.25? ( in your mind)
related to 907 not 218 and 595 brief discussion on st here
https://stocktwits.com/message/270297794
is it a buy at $4? $2 $5? ;)
I entered 95001339 as is no commas et al. It took me to a screen that had the transaction history tab.
I think the search is a little glitchy. This is what I saw only partial pg pg.
12-30-2020 Terminated; released to Publications for Issuance of Reexam Certificate
12-11-2020 RX - Mail Notice of Intent to Issue Reexam Certificate
07-22-2020 Court Processing Terminated
10-15-2020 Information Disclosure Statement (IDS) Filed
10-15-2020 Information Disclosure Statement Filed
10-15-2020 Certificate of Service
10-15-2020 Information Disclosure Statement (IDS) Filed
06-15-2020 Decision by CAFC - Affirmed
04-01-2019 Appeal to Court of Appeals
04-01-2019 Requester Appeal to the Federal Circuit
04-01-2019 Certificate of Service
04-01-2019 Patent Owner Appeal to the Federal Circuit Filed
03-29-2019 Certificate of Service
03-29-2019 Patent Owner Appeal to the Federal Circuit Filed
01-31-2019 Board of Appeals Decision on Rehearing - Decision is Final and Appealable
01-31-2019 Board of Appeals Decision on Rehearing - Decision is Final and Appealable
08-09-2018
The below link does take one to the directions for using the search pg on the uspto web-site; it has come to my attention that the link in that ST post does not work on the (my) desktop.
This link works on desk top https://portal.uspto.gov/pair/PublicPair
and if directions are needed for how to search for status of recert the stocktwits link will help.
https://stocktwits.com/sidneyphillips/message/268585806
I prefer to base my investment decisions on facts that don't increase speculation like this:
Appeal AFFIRMED:
https://www.finnegan.com/en/tools/google-llc-v-netlist-inc.html
NLST's request for their patent re-certification "in the mail":
PATENT: 95/001,339
Filing or 371 (c) Date: 06-08-2010
Status: Terminated; released to Publications for issuance of Reexam Certificate
Status Date: 12-30-2020
Next step is lift stay CEO says Q1
***NLST https://netlist.com/
Short story:
*google made a NDA with NLST to use their seminal technology
*google was bad even lied to court
*they lost their appeal
*google let date to file with scotus pass
*now one way or another they must pay
*one way to pay--google's case and settlement with ADT(eye opening)
*another wayto pay-- Centripetal v Cisco (cisco was bad for 3 yrs
google is on the hook for 11 yrs)
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=160597164
*stay est lift Q1 2021
*I bought on last dip under .50
*yahoo board and ihub board are bullish
lots of speculation but also good info.
*I will sell some shares to recoop my investment $$,
let the rest ripen (there are other companies that are
using NLST tech illegally listen to last CC)