Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
125 by xmas
love BABA
Got in at 90
just a small sample for cancer screening and of course some people with high risk will still drink the crap evry 2 -5 years...i bought as its coming off the highs..imo bl
love it
buying on the way down
am in
After Hours : 16.20 0.71 (4.58%) 7:51PM EST 3/5/2014
At 15:59 a buy of 15,941 shares @15.49 = $246,926 ......tells me something is going on !!!!! $BL$
Street is looking for .14 we will see tomorrow morning
Hope thursdays numbers surprize fingers crossed
am in !!!!!! bl
Going big time
Nice base .22 to .25 imo $BL$
Nice...good luck
As always nice work,keep us up to date ......WDDD ...$BL$
Lots of people with 50k and 100k ...nice...$BL$
go wddd go
Thanks no problem !!!! $BL$
Great work thank you ....$BL$
198 for you
Thank you
Yep another week closer we get......bl
We will see ..imo
Yep...thank you ...$BL$
Anyone need a mark no problem ...$BL$
Maybe but to scare newbies out of there shares to get in cheaper is always there plan.Hope not time will tell ...good luck
Yes indeed.......bl
So then at 3:59pm someone will paint it down !! No worries here,soon we will know....$$$$$$$$$$....WDDD...GO BABY GO...$BL$
Hope so !!!
FEB 28,2014-UPDATE COURT FILING
From poster coolhaedsprvail thank you $bl$
ACTIVISION BLIZZARD, INC., BLIZZARD
ENTERTAINMENT, INC., and ACTIVISION
PUBLISHING, INC.,
Defendants.
Civil Action No.
1:12-CV-10576-DJC
JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
WORLDS, INC.’S REQUEST FOR MARKMAN HEARING
Plaintiff Worlds, Inc. (Worlds) respectfully requests that the Court schedule a Markman hearing. The Markman hearing has already been postponed twice, and there are several reasons why the Markman should be scheduled without further delay.
First, irrespective of how the Court decides Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment, this case will proceed and require a Markman hearing. There is simply no reason to put off the Markman hearing until the Court issues its summary judgment order. It is of course Worlds’ strong contention that Defendants’ Motion should be denied in its entirety. But regardless of how the Court decides the core issues at stake, the Certificates of Correction (D.I. 107) issued to Worlds are effective in this case as to Defendants’ ongoing infringement and eliminate any argument Defendants could have for outright dismissal. See, e.g., Lamoureux v. AnazaoHealth Corp., 669 F. Supp. 2d 227, 236 (D. Conn. 2009) (“[T]he critical date for purposes of determining whether the certificate of correction applies is the date the cause of action arose, i.e., the date the infringing conduct occurred, and not the date the complaint was filed.”); Masonite Corp. v. Craftmaster Mfg., Inc., 2011 WL 1642518, at *3 (N.D. Ill. Apr. 29, 2011) (same). This case will go on, and as such a Markman hearing should be scheduled.
Second, claim construction motions have been fully briefed, and the parties have already prepared for two postponed Markman hearings. There is no justification for further delay. In line with the parties’ Joint Scheduling Statement, the Court initially scheduled the Markman hearing for June 27, 2013. Then, in light of the Court’s trial calendar, the Court rescheduled the Markman hearing for August 22–23, 2013. In the interim, Defendants filed a Motion for Summary Judgment on Invalidity, in light of which the Court postponed the Markman hearing indefinitely. On October 17, 2013, the Court heard the parties’ summary judgment arguments. The Court has not yet issued a summary judgment order. Presently, claim construction has been fully briefed for more than nine months, and the lack of a Markman hearing has put this case in limbo and already severely delayed the expected trial date.1 Given that Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment is not case-dispositive, the fact that claim construction is briefed and ripe for decision counsels strongly in favor of scheduling a Markman hearing promptly.
Third, any further delay would harm Worlds. As an initial matter, the delayed Markman hearing and trial setting impairs Worlds’ ability to obtain timely relief for Activision’s ongoing acts of infringement. This potential for harm has been compounded by the fact that, in October 2013, Activision filed a lawsuit in the Central District of California where it accused Worlds of infringing two patents that Activision recently purchased (presumably with the intention of harassing Worlds and other entities that had sued Activision). See Activision Publishing, Inc. v. Worlds, Inc. et al, No. CV 13-07380 (C.D. Cal.); see also, e.g., Activision Publishing, Inc. v. Novalogic, Inc., No. CV 13-05091 (C.D. Cal.) (suing Novalogic for infringement of the same the patents-in-suit from the Activision v. Worlds case, where Novalogic had previously sued Activision for patent infringement). Further delay in this case — the primary case — could give Activision further opportunity to use its financial resources to collaterally attack Worlds and interfere with Worlds’ pursuit of its rights in this case.
For these reasons, Worlds respectfully requests that the Court schedule the Markman hearing promptly, for a date as soon as the Court’s calendar would permit.
Dated: February 28, 2014 Respectfully submitted,
Worlds, Inc.
By its attorneys,
By: /s/ Ryan V. Caughey
Max L. Tribble (admitted pro hac vice)
Brian D. Melton (admitted pro hac vice)
Chanler Langham (pro hac vice pending)
Ryan Caughey (admitted pro hac vice)
SUSMAN GODFREY L.L.P.
Joel R. Leeman (BBO # 292070)
SUNSTEIN KANN MURPHY & TIMBERS LLP
Attorneys for Plaintiff Worlds, Inc.
###
1:12-cv-10576-DJC Worlds, Inc. v. Activision Blizzard, Inc. et al
Nice
As the days go by,we get closer to a decision ...sooner then later ...imo $BL$
Every week that goes by is another week closer to a answer..imo $BL$
Sounds good to me am in to the end !!!!! $BL$
Just buyers came in and up we go real simple on ...no news !!! imo $BL$
Yes sir !!!!