Not really news, but interesting info nonetheless. https://www.stocktitan.net/news/LBSR/liberty-star-board-chair-pete-o-heeron-director-gerardo-king-11lct93m4bir.html?utm_source=chatgpt.com

Word.

Donald Trumps executive order will not help UURAF because it is Canadian bitches. 🇨🇦.

(OTCPINK:VAPR)

PINK is a big turn off for most investors.

Playing around with AI, here is an Investor Briefing for your entertainment;

Investor Briefing – Special Meeting Proxy Overview
Company: BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc.
Filing Date: March 13, 2025
Meeting Date: TBD
Reference: Proposals 1 & 2 (Convertible Notes Approval & Adjournment)

Proposal 1: Approval for Issuance of Common Stock (NYSE Rule 312.03)
BigBear.ai is requesting stockholder approval to issue common stock related to its $182.3M in new 6.00% Convertible Senior Secured Notes due 2029. Approval is needed to:
+ Convert the notes into common stock
+ Issue stock instead of cash for interest payments

Why it matters: NYSE rules require stockholder approval for share issuances exceeding 20% of outstanding shares.

Convertible Notes Overview
Conversion Rate: 281.4491 shares per $1,000 principal (~$3.55/share)

Interest Rate:
6.00% (cash)
7.00% (stock)
Up to 10.00% if liquidity is low

Maturity Date: Dec 15, 2029
Redemption: Allowed after Dec 27, 2025, if stock exceeds 130% of conversion price
Important: Until Proposal 1 is approved, all conversions and interest payments must be made in cash, which could affect liquidity.

Impact on Current Stockholders
Dilution: Ownership could fall from 77.4% to 55.7%
AE Industrial Partners would own ~16.3%
Resale Risk: Potential for share price pressure if large volumes are sold

Proposal 2: Adjournment Authorization
If Proposal 1 lacks votes, this allows the Board to adjourn the meeting to continue soliciting support.

Board Recommendation
✅ Vote FOR Proposals 1 & 2
Supports liquidity, avoids default, and strengthens long-term financial flexibility.

⚠️ Consequences if Proposal 1 Is Not Approved:
All note conversions must be paid in cash after March 31, 2025
No ability to pay interest in stock
Risk of default if the company can't meet cash obligations

And if history is any guide, this will be approved, the volatility will prevail, money will be made and lost, the dust will settle and the process will start a new, Rin$e wa$h repeat.

Not a dumb question, When a stock undergoes a split or reverse split, any warrants associated with that stock are typically adjusted to reflect the change — both in terms of the number of warrants and the exercise price. Read the small print in the warrant agreement or prospectus — it spells out the exact formula for adjustments. If your interested a quick search yields the following:

Adjustment of Exercise Price and Shares Issuable:
Reverse split: the exercise price of the warrants is increased proportionally, and the number of shares purchasable upon exercise of each warrant is decreased proportionally.

Prior to a reverse stock split, if a warrant allowed the purchase of 1 share at $11.50, a 10-for-1 reverse split would adjust the warrant to allow the purchase of 0.1 shares at $115.00.

10 years and still here, that's impressive. 🤔

https://stockscan.io/stocks/VAPR... check out the forecast fwiw.

Not to be downer but todays volume is 838 or $7.62.

Where's the Beef?

https://www.yahoo.com/finance/news/warren-buffett-says-tariffs-act-180449862.html

Lucid relies on sales from USA, Canada, Europe and Asia. Tariffs and retaliatory tariffs are big drivers in lower stock prices.

It seems to me, correct me if I am wrong, institutional ownership (percentage as a whole) has not changed with the departure of Libby. Patents, and Institutional ownership speak of something worth investing in. At its core this is nothing more than a speculative play. Invest what you can afford to loose and don't whine about if you do.

Institutional ownership may help with your dilemma.
https://www.marketbeat.com/stocks/NASDAQ/LWLG/institutional-ownership/

You do realize the entire market is in the dumper?

https://www.aft.org/press-release/major-teachers-union-urges-top-asset-managers-review-investments-tesla

indeed, 'why' will determine if huge is positive or negative. It works both ways.
May the Schwartz be with you.🍀

and yet the market seems unimpressed, why?

Your are correct in theory. Under ANCSA and the 'Takings Clause' of the Constitution the US government could use eminent domain to force a road. However, it would not be easy nor quick. The US would need to prove in court that the road serves a genuine public purpose, if it can not then it could be deemed an unconstitutional taking. There are other avenues that could be explored, the State of Alaska has sometimes negotiated easements or land exchanges to facilitate infrastructure projects and the feds could pressure the State to negotiate with Pedro Bay Corp, While the legal framework exists for the feds to exercise eminent domain, applying it to ANCSA lands for the benefit of Pebble Mine, would be unprecedented and legally contentious. Think years or decades of litigation.

Your not gonna like to hear this because it adds insult to injury but under the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act (ANCSA) of 1971, Alaska Native Corporations (ANCs) generally do not pay federal or state property taxes on their ANCSA land holdings as long as the land remains undeveloped and is not used for business purposes.

more insider buying, thats new and improved.

I hope its not DOGE, that will not end well.

This is an electric kit car with zero production (zero produced to date), I would really like to review any information that puts this company in a position to be bigger than Fisker let alone Lucid. I appreciate your enthusiasm but I fear that eCite will go way of the Fisker Ocean in the end.

.

IF fiat money loses all it's worth LWLG's failure will be the least of investors problems. To put it lightly if you do not currently own whatever will replace fiat, be it crypto, gold or twinkies you are F%&*ed!

Short answer is no. pedro bay shareholders https://alaskapublic.org/news/2023-03-21/pedro-bay-deal-blocked-pebble-before-epas-veto-but-still-protects-salmon-habitat. For more info dig into Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act (ANCSA) , all involved need to be thoroughly versed in order to understand the hurdles facing Pebble. Pedro Bay Corporation is an Alaska Native Corporation established under ANCSA. While ANCSA lands are technically private, there are unique protections and sovereignty considerations when it comes to Native land rights, which would complicate eminent domain proceedings.

There are some pretty big hurdles to get over before this mine ever sees the light of day. After the permitting and getting permission BS there is the giant elephant in the room, getting the ore to market. Because the US is woefully inadequate for processing ore it must be shipped overseas. In order to get the ore from point A (the mine) to point B (the processors) it must go through tribal lands. NAK spells out the difficulty in small print on page 16 of this powerpoint under Assumptions.
ndm_presentation_january_15_2024_final

Without third party agreement with infrastructure the only way to get ore to market is by helicopter (this method would be prohibitively expensive) Assuming the third parties have a change of heart (yes it is plausible, but highly unlikely) now the ore must be processed.

Lacking control over the production side of the mineral supply chain puts the nation at the mercy of countries that may or may not decide to sell refined metals, critical minerals, and rare earths to the U.S. in the future. what chinas ban are earths processing technology exports means The Biden admin initiated a fix, but it will take time. The current admin has stuck a fork in the cog of the machine when recently China saw fit to retaliate the tariff talk we all have been hearing about. china expands mineral control. I could go on and on presenting more hurdles (billionaires playground is in Pebbles backyard for example) but what I have mentioned will certainly be enough to delay this mine for the foreseeable future.

You have a good point regarding the purchase of common stock, however, options tell a different story. Still, you make a valid point. https://www.secform4.com/insider-trading/1325964.htm

Well I am glad to hear things are very serious, I was worried there might be some funny business going.😉

Well he reversed  Obamas renaming Mt. McKinely to Denali then renamed it back to McKinely...and then he renamed the Gulf of Mexico. priorities priorities. Are we great yet??

S-1 Does the forecast call for pain...

Pros: If PHIO demonstrates strong progress in its clinical trials, communicates a clear and effective use of proceeds, and generates positive clinical and financial milestones, the additional 5.9 million shares is a reasonable trade-off for long-term growth.

Cons: If there’s limited progress (no reason to believe there will be with the recent news) delays, or ambiguity about the company’s ability to monetize its pipeline, the market may view the dilution as detrimental, which will be bad, very, very bad indeed.

When will the warrants expire??

Series E Warrants: Exercisable until December 2029 @ $2.51
Series F Warrants: Exercisable until December 2029 @ 2.00
Series G, H, and I Warrants: Exercisable until January 2027 $3.00
Warrants must be exercised voluntarily, and holders typically do so when the market price exceeds the warrant exercise price.

This may get sloppy, so hold on.

try https://x.com/CoinbaseSupport You will be surprised how accommodating they are.

Buy the company not the stock...

Agreed, very similar to buying a brand new refrigerator and throwing it off a cliff to watch it smash to bits, entertaining to say the least.

Don't hold your breath. https://www.science.org/content/article/reversal-trump-kills-huge-alaskan-gold-mine-here-s-why

New Symbol PTX

I wish you luck with your theory, I hope you are right. 

A whole $7.33 traded today. Yowzaa!

Volume: 342

I simply like the car, its lines, quality and performance all speak quality to me. Tesla, although groundbreaking and a nice product, does not turn my head. I'm in Lucid because it does.

Lucid Motors has significant backing from the Public Investment Fund (PIF) of Saudi Arabia, which holds a majority stake in the company. This relationship complicates any potential acquisition, as the PIF's strategic interests may not align with a sale to Tesla. Additionally, Lucid has been expanding its operations, including plans for a manufacturing facility in Saudi Arabia, further entrenching its ties with the PIF.

Given these complexities, even if Tesla deemed the acquisition advantageous, executing such a deal would be challenging due to Lucid's existing commitments and ownership structure.
Even if Elon wanted to buy Lucid with his personal private funds he would still need approval from Lucid Motors' board of directors and its shareholders and the PIF. Is this plausible, sure, likely? nope.

Which Is Better?
Determining superiority depends on individual preferences and priorities:
Performance and Range: Lucid's Air models offer higher performance and longer range in certain configurations.
Infrastructure and Experience: Tesla's established charging network and broader vehicle lineup provide convenience and versatility.
Brand Maturity: Tesla's longer market presence may appeal to those valuing a proven track record.
Both manufacturers excel in different areas, and the choice between them should align with the investors specific goals and preferences.