Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Congrats jake, you killed your stock. Can't wait for the dilution train to start again.
Is this what shareholder value looks like? Asking for a friend.
Correct, but you know who CAN start selling? Jake.
Not only can you have lost 99% of your investment here, you are about to lose 99.99999% 🤣
Road back to .0001 begins Monday
The SEC and FINRA are not orgs looking out for shareholders, this shouldn't be a surprise. With enough elbow grease, you can completely ruin all shareholders.
This is real and will happen on Monday. Another dump round of dilution incoming!
Due to to advice from Nevada securities attorney being retained, I will no longer publicly comment on this stock.
Consequences incoming stat
Honestly, it's almost like he wants to go to jail.
He has officially played too many games. He does not know how the legal system works and because of that signed himself up for a lawsuit. I hope you like it Jake.
Word is that Jake absolutely F'd himself today trying to cheat the system he doesn't know how it works.
It's on now.
Welcome my friends to the next HPIL
Anyone know anything about this?
Our office has opened investigations into several public company issuers who's executive management team(s) may have participated in get rich quick schemes utilizing a 3(a)(10) process to secure free trading shares from their companies by going into state courts (that are not…
— Mark R. Basile,Esq. (@BasileEsq) May 10, 2024
In the two videos he blames OTCM for not allowing the TA to update, then admits he has strategically allowed the TA to make updates 1-2 times to reflect the share retirements. Of course, he was busy selling ~750M shares from his accounts.
Did ya'll see this?
Jake used "a" lawyer with zero understanding of securities law (evidenced by your severe violations of Rule 144 and the 3a10 exemption) and then they both bragged about their misdeeds on social media platforms.
Here is his lawyer, proud of forcing Jake's own company to illegally pay out in unrestricted shares in violation of the 3a10 exemption rules which does not allow affiliates:
But wait... he wasn't Jake's lawyer... he was the COMPANY'S lawyer and his obligations were that of protecting the company from fraud and unjust settlements. Jake already had a convertible note for $12M plus expenses. The company was never obligated to pay cash. What Jake and Jake's... I mean... the "company's lawyer" did was defraud the courts to get an illegal 3a10 exemption so Jake could use company stock as an open bank account.
Why would the lawyer representing the company, tasked with the company' best interest, be bragging about getting a family office free trading shares on LinkedIn? It is because Jake was the lead on both sides and all parties were paid by him for one outcome, to illegally defraud the courts to obtain a 3a10 settlement for an affiliate (not allowed).
The conflict of interest is so clear you could see the bottom of the ocean.
Guys... I don't think this is what Jake was hoping for with the SLAPP lawsuits... an almost dead iHub board is now a ragging inferno of inconvenient truth.
He gagged the TA from updating OTCM, one of his later press releases he admits to the OS being like 3B. he directly sold ~750M into the market in 2023 and then issued and sold a large amount of ~2B more in 2024. Details unknown.
This is not toxic noteholders, etc. This is Jake, giving himself free trading shares, and selling them into the market, while pumping the stock and claiming dilution is a false narritive.
Three accounts on iHub posted photos of a person's kids, their mom, dad, brothers, etc claiming they were part of a crime ring for naked shorting. They made multiple threats. This person and their family don't even know what OTC is, let alone the accusations. iHub only deleted the photos with the kids in them and any threats, didn't ban the persons, and their council rejected the request for information.
Jake hasn't cited a single instance of any of these posters doing this, in fact, he has admitted he included someone who hasn't posted about him in 4 years openly on iHub. This will go where all his lawsuits go, the trash,
Worse than that, read this and then read the twitter threads for each claim of fraud:
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=174382154
Yes, it's incredible. Jake, again, decided to come on here and say things that are clearly untrue based on his own lawsuit. Pretending to only want names for protection orders, yet his lawsuit is asking for $1,000,000. Naming folks who've never even posted about him, bots, someone from 4 years ago, and people unrelated to the unproven threats.
This is a SLAPP lawsuit Jake intended on scaring people into not talking about the numerous severe and ongoing violations of the SEC rules and regulations by him. This is retaliation, nothing he stated is in his lawsuit, in fact, his lawsuit proves the exact opposite.
Check the linked X thread on that, each post has a clear title and supporting thread with proof is linked. It is missing nothing.
Sorry, sarcasm, you didn't do anything but post facts about his past and your opinion on it. It's a SLAPP suit. His excuse for naming you is that you (and almost 400 other accounts) threatened him and his family.
You of course did not and he is just trying to get you to stop spreading facts about his past.
He will be, it's in process. Same attorney did the illegal 3a10z
He is talking about why you were on the list on another board if you can find it:
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=174356748
I decided to ensure that the real DD is presented.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=174382154
This is interesting, you indicated that you carefully reviewed the list, leaving out Janice for well thought out reasons, and that this is about going after people who made threats against your family.
Yet, the list includes numerous bot accounts and people who have never posted about you, your family, or your company, including:
1) Fake OTC influencer bot accounts, such as @_MoonMarKt__ which is suspended, @TarasBulls808s which is a fake TaraBull account which never tweeted about you, fake @anya_tradies, and tens of other random bot accounts
2) Account that have never posted AT ALL, let alone about you, your family, or your company
3) Accounts that at most liked a post mentioning you or you company
4) Hundreds of accounts that have done NOTHING you have mentioned as your "reason."
5) People who said something you didn't like years ago unrelated to whatever you are suing for now. You indeed straight up stated here you had no idea if he has stated something lately, you decide to name him in a subpoena anyways.
A serious lawsuit not meant to simply be a SLAPP lawsuit for intimidation purposes would have listed the exact names of accounts that made these claims and providing proof these threats did occur linking them to the names. Instead, you just make claims and without care list a bunch of random people that do not fit what you said happened at all. That is reckless, that is improper, that absolutely discredits what you have stated here.
People who didn't even know who you or your company are are posting asking what is going on. It is incredible what lengths you will go through to hide the fact you have violated the 144 drip rule limiting affiliates from selling >1% of the OS over any given 3 month period. You sold ~750M over ~6 month period per your own filings and court documents in 2023. Meanwhile, you were complaining about people selling and flipping, saying dilution isn't happening and is a "false narrative." Weird, because the only reason the PPS kept going down is you selling shares.
What is even worse, is.. you kept doing it into 2024. When you went to court, didn't tell the judge you were unable to get a 3a10 exemption because you were an affiliate (you cited this in your previous case), and had already had the attempt dismissed WITH prejudice after you begged the judge to not get you in trouble for UPL. But, that didn't stop you, converting billions of shares and selling a ton of them. Again, breaking the 144 drip rule. And what did you do? Oh, that is right, you blamed flipper and then went on to dump hundreds of millions to billions of shares tanking the stock price while pumping fake revenue numbers.
But let's not sue my opinion to assess the badness of this situation, heck, let's not even use the SEC's CLEAR rules and regulations. Let's go ahead and use your own assessment of what you did and the implications of it:
https://twitter.com/i/status/1786775952954921331
Not great Bob... feel free to peruse the part you keep repeating over and over about the 3a10 being used for capital raises...
Full thread here:
https://x.com/FLOWInvesting/status/1783935646773440907
Odd this account is on the list, given they have said nothin about your family or made any threats. The only reason they are on it is because they have the best DD on your and your abuse of the ticker for personal gain, specifying exactly how what you did was not allowed. No threats, no comments about your family, just links to SEC cases and regulations, your filings, your court cases.
This lawsuit is indeed a SLAPP lawsuit, it doesn't end well for people that abuse the court system.
What makes it worse, is you play the victim card here while creating hundreds of victims because you can't deal directly with the SEC violations you have caused. In fact, you are in contact with individuals ACTUALLY doing what you claim is being done to you with the intent to dox this individual to his harassers who just last week sent death threats to them. The emails from your lawyer to the person making the death threats have been obtained:
https://twitter.com/FLOWInvesting/status/1786494079917850960
Again, what you have stated and the lawsuit + subpoena's you have filed don't match. They are in fact evidence of the exact opposite, you don't like what someone says, they like the wrong post, etc and they end up in one of your SLAPP lawsuits who's sole intent is to harass folks using their 1st amendment rights to provide meaningful and relevant criticism about a public official and his company. We know what a lawsuit SHOULD have look liked, you instead did none of that, opting to sue investors for simply existing, liking a post, and for some reason a bunch of random bots now suspended.
No one takes you, your company, or your lawsuits seriously. You left out the request for $1M. I will not tolerate such reprehensible behavior, harassment, threats, by you.
SONG will be no bid with a .0001 ask by the end of year, for the sole reason of the CEO, you, dumping billions of shares on to the market, illegally, in violation of Rule 144 and the 3a10 exception. Bringing more unwanted attention to you and your company you otherwise would not be getting. Again, this is crystal clear, you are in fact not doing this for your stated reasons, instead most accounts you named were not even aware of the things you stated let alone participated in them.
This is careless, reckless, reprehensible, harassment, and gaslighting. Grown ups know better, children do not.
Stevie Brown has been documented to have stolen over $3M from HPIL. Sources, his own lawsuits, his own filings, recorded conversations between him and David P, and leaked emails. This is not a debate anymore, this is a fact.
I'm sorry Stevie scammed you mate and you will never get that money back. No need to lash out at me over it. I certainly get all those labels, seems as if you are happy to ignore what they mean.
Have fun never getting your funds back because of willful ignorance.
*crap not crab?
Nah mate I do what I want and stop scams. Batting 100% and about to shut down SONG for similar fraud. This MF don't miss, go ahead and try and twist it all you want. I do great work, you have seen it on Twitter and on here. Big fat W's all around. SEC already shut down CRKM, just wait till HPIL is freed from Stevie's greasy scammy palms.
If you saw an old man getting punched in the face on the sidewalk, would you intervene or let it continue? If you continue, is that proof that if you did intervene it was because the guy bearing up the old man is in the right? Because why would you help another human right?
The shareholders are the old man getting punched in the face, I see an old helpless old man getting absolutely scammed I am stepping in. It is what good people do.
He doesnt have to issue himself restricted shares, he has a 3a10, he converts and sells into the market
14.5B / 500,000 = 29,000 OS... if the plan is a 29k OS... then we all can infer what the real OS is now.
FLOW told everyone to sell it at .01
Holy crap, almost the entire OS dumped into 2's in one day. I "wonder" who could have that many shares to sell.
You are in fact an American Hero