InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 3
Posts 557
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/27/2023

Re: None

Friday, 05/10/2024 6:41:13 AM

Friday, May 10, 2024 6:41:13 AM

Post# of 9999
Did ya'll see this?

Jake used "a" lawyer with zero understanding of securities law (evidenced by your severe violations of Rule 144 and the 3a10 exemption) and then they both bragged about their misdeeds on social media platforms.

Here is his lawyer, proud of forcing Jake's own company to illegally pay out in unrestricted shares in violation of the 3a10 exemption rules which does not allow affiliates:



But wait... he wasn't Jake's lawyer... he was the COMPANY'S lawyer and his obligations were that of protecting the company from fraud and unjust settlements. Jake already had a convertible note for $12M plus expenses. The company was never obligated to pay cash. What Jake and Jake's... I mean... the "company's lawyer" did was defraud the courts to get an illegal 3a10 exemption so Jake could use company stock as an open bank account.



Why would the lawyer representing the company, tasked with the company' best interest, be bragging about getting a family office free trading shares on LinkedIn? It is because Jake was the lead on both sides and all parties were paid by him for one outcome, to illegally defraud the courts to obtain a 3a10 settlement for an affiliate (not allowed).

The conflict of interest is so clear you could see the bottom of the ocean.
Bearish
Bearish
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y