Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
I don’t think anyone left holding…or continuing to build a position is “hoping” for anything. It either moves eventually or it doesn’t, but I’m certainly not losing any sleep over it.
However, it certainly seems that your level of agitation over a “dead” ticker and anyone that remains long is suggestive of a person that hopes nothing ever happens here. It’s sad really.
How many more years will you surveil and moderate the discussion board of a stock that will never do anything ever again (in your opinion)? That’s a much more interesting question. Why would someone go to the lengths you and your minions go to with what you allege is a dead stock? There are really only two answers - you either have a significant interest in the ticker remaining “dead” or you are insane.
Just more blubbering from the peanut gallery. I know why I’m here - I’m a shareholder and I believe that I may one day realize a decent gain with this ticker. Pretty black and white.
What is less clear is why you and JS go out of your ways to surveil and moderate this board. Most people don’t spend their own time trying to discourage others from participating in something they have no purported interest in.
But I thank you for your continued presence as it greatly assists me in maintaining my bullish thesis.
I can’t believe people still create new accounts just to stumble upon the discussion board of a dead stock, become a moderator, and routinely provide negative commentary despite alleging they don’t have any skin in the game. I also can’t believe Janice has been all over this for almost a decade. Those are truly interesting facts.
Sure Janice. So you are saying the MM was willing to provide liquidity in an “illiquid” stock. Got it.
You literally just said a few posts ago that only a MM can execute a trade at .00001, but now you are saying they were executing an open order. Therefore, some other party was selling and some other party was buying. Fact.
Do tell Janice. If I recall correctly, you were adamant that there were no market makers engaged in the Expert Market. The literature even says that the Expert Market is available to match buy and sell orders on an unsolicited basis…which means no MM quotation. Just brokers putting out the buy and sell orders of clients until they match. However, there is nothing stopping the broker(s) from being the buyers of their own clients shares.
So which is it Janice? Are MM’s working this ticker or not? You can’t have it both ways.
Blah, blah, blah. Some entity is now long 8 million shares. That’s a fact.
The usual idiotic analysis. After all this time, somebody with nearly 8 million shares just frantically decides to liquidate some or all of their position for about $200 for no apparent or particular reason. Sure Janice. What is more likely is someone had a margin call on their account and the broker decided to steal these shares to cover it. Or this was a planned purchase by insiders/associates. Nonetheless, 8 million shares on a “dead” ticker is a curious event. What is known for sure is that some entity just established or added to a CRGP position (every sell needs a corresponding buy). That’s a fact.
Look at you two go. A match made in heaven. The lunatics truly are running the asylum here.
Oh geez. Sorry. Only NINE years. Just for entertainment right? And now you are at the point of having semantic arguments over word choice. A classic strategy to distract from the real matter at hand. You bozos need a new playbook. Maybe then you wouldn't have to bombard these boards with your nonsense for nine years. Yeah, Cologne just appears out of thin air a year ago and just happens to stumble upon the CRGP board and makes the bulk of his negative contributions here while also opting to become a moderator. Nothing odd there 🙄. Just some random poster keeping himself entertained right?
The story it tells is obvious. For at least 10 years, Janice, a known basher, and some of her loyal minions have relentlessly surveilled this board to ensure that there is a constant negative tone. They go as far as making themselves moderators to ensure they are aware of all posts and have the ability to remove posts they don’t like.
They have no declared skin in the game and insist they are just here for entertainment, but that is obviously an insane assertion. There were things I was obsessed with 10 years ago…but I can’t even remember what those things were anymore because I’ve moved on with life. There is quite obviously an incentive for them to continue their activity beyond mere entertainment.
If Janice and her minions are lurking and desperately trying to control the narrative, you can be sure they are acting on behalf of a concerned party that would find it troubling if the share price started to rise with renewed optimism. And the fact that they are still lurking suggests this ticker is not nearly as “dead” as they would like everyone to believe.
My goodness. The crazies have themselves really worked up. It’s like watching a scene from One Flew Over The Cuckoos Nest. All these hysterics and constant surveillance from people who don’t even have skin in the game. Bizarre.
https://www.sec.gov/comments/s7-29-22/s72922-20153799-321641.pdf
A little light reading...from the SEC website. Curious what Janice's thoughts are on this? Just more conspiracy theory mumbo jumbo I'm sure.
That was a savage shakeout for the impatient flippers. I love it.
What do you mean .02 was the time to sell? You'd have to be some sort of market wizard to sell the top. I'll take 100-200%. If it takes another 2-3 years to pan out, it will be a fantastic speculative investment that blows away any sort of standard returns the market is capable of giving.
No, I’m not the only buyer. This stock has traded over 100 million shares since being kicked to Expert Market. My purchases have been a minor fraction of that total. However, some other entity has been able to steadily obtain tens of millions of shares at rock bottom.
Sure Janice. I guess we will just pretend that over 100 million shares haven’t traded since this got sent to Expert Market. It’s all just my imagination.
In a ticker like this, whales don’t buy 20 million all at once. You should know this Janice. They buy a couple hundred million or more over the course of several years…which appears to be evident in this case if you just open up some basic volume data. This is an extremely uncomplicated thing to understand.
Just another million+ shares transacted today. I can't get over how "dead" this ticker is.
That must be a significant source of irritation for you. Sorry.
So you are still here because you feel the story isn't over? That's interesting.
I didn't realize it was a competition. And you have been surveilling this board for 9 years why exactly? Just for fun?
It's so cute that you two have found each other. Of all the gin joints in all the towns in the world, you two have magically found a bond on a message board for a long forgotten "dead" ticker that will never trade again...despite the fact that it is trading. It was destiny for you two jamokes to connect.
Are you actually suggesting that paid bashing doesn’t exist? My 5 year old could conclusively prove that false with a few clicks on a screen.
And this is what you resort to. Petty blubbering. At least I know I’m over the target. Bombs away…in the somewhat near future I imagine. Although I know it will have no impact on you personally. You are a professional troll that is deployed to control narratives. No different than some idiot politician’s press Secretary. A paid shill for the agenda. You know most people that defy you will lose, but it agitates you to no end that you can’t have total control and please your masters because there are a few that just won’t relent. Sorry Janice.
What’s plainly silly would be dumping money into AAPL and ever hoping to see a 100% ROI. In the OTC, that is a routinely achievable goal with a little patience. I just had an absolute banger on ZIVO this month. It will finance free purchases in CRGP for months.
More excuses. You are the self appointed subject matter expert and police of this board for years, but I guess it’s all just for fun. Sure Janice.
Which is why you’ve made yourself a moderator and get alerted to every post made here. Just casually popping in for fun. Terrible liar.
It doesn’t need to be. I’m merely highlight the plain fact that someone who puts money into the OTC and AAPL probably has the same chance of getting a 100% return in 5-10 years. It’s a plainly observable fact.
Janice is literally trying to say anything that will distract from the fact that CRGP is actively trading and shares CAN be bought at the ask and sold at the bid with instant execution. Her opinion is that because US brokers have restricted their clients from buying, that the stock is somehow "illiquid"...even though one thing has nothing to do with the other. The bid/ask spread and the Expert Market status are also irrelevant. CRGP can be sold by anyone willing to accept the bid price and can be bought by anyone (outside the US) that is willing to accept the ask price. That is liquidity.
You realize waiting 5-10 years on a stock to produce a 100-1000% return is a good investment right? That’s part of the allure of the OTC. Of course there are loads of get rich quick folks in the OTC who want a 5 bagger overnight, but that’s not reality in most cases. Most people would be waiting 5-10 years to see a 100% return on a company as solid as AAPL if they invested today, so I’m not really sure what your point is. The OTC allows gains to be magnified for patient people with less capital.
100% gains in the OTC literally happen daily and can be pretty easy to find. 500-1000% gains are not uncommon. Most of these tickers just require a long basing period/consolidation and they eventually run. It’s just the reality my friend. You can scan through hundreds of charts and it’s pretty much the same every time.
You realize waiting 5-10 years on a stock to produce a 100-1000% return is a good investment right? That’s part of the allure of the OTC. Of course there are loads of get rich quick folks in the OTC who want a 5 bagger overnight, but that’s not reality in most cases. Most people would be waiting 5-10 years to see a 100% return on a company as solid as AAPL if they invested today, so I’m not really sure what your point is. The OTC allows gains to be magnified for patient people with less capital.
100% gains in the OTC literally happen daily and can be pretty easy to find. 500-1000% gains are not uncommon. Most of these tickers just require a long basing period/consolidation and they eventually run. It’s just the reality my friend. You can scan through hundreds of charts and it’s pretty much the same every time.
More lame excuses. The percentage change is not relevant with a ticker like this. It has traded in a consistent and predictable range for 2 years. Volatility is basically zero.
Huh? What’s with the exclamation mark. Stop yelling and calm down. You are quite unhinged.
The price does not change dramatically. It has ping ponged around the same general range for a couple years. Volatility is non-existent.
At least he “likes” all of his own posts.
But that doesn’t change the fact that it’s not illiquid. If someone that is not restricted from trading by their broker puts in an order at the bid or ask, it will execute. It’s very simple Janice.
And yes, US brokers are most certainly gleeful at the “suckers” whose shares they are able to snag.
I knew one of you dumbos were going to bring up the classic "tax relief" excuse despite the fact that it is January and end of year selling for tax purposes has passed. There is nobody selling now that wasn't selling in December or before.
Wrong again Janice. The stock only has restricted BUYING in the US because brokers have collectively decided not to permit buying despite no legal or regulatory obligation to put this restriction in place. Brokers are still executing sell orders with glee. You can't call a stock illiquid just because brokers in one country are refusing to execute buy orders. My god you are dumb.