Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
How to make a (text) tif file smaller.
Because your file is a picture of text converting it to text will make it much smaller.
Acrobat can do this. It will attempt to maintain the appearance (font and size).
Brainless is very modest and
he freely gives credit, even for work that doesn't exist, see
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=33920389
Small brains may plagiarize, but brainless is a very bright fellow and he is very
knowledgeable. He is equally eminently qualified in physics and chemistry, and
as this post shows, also in math.
All this is so natural to him that praise left him "flabbergasted."
Brainless sent me a message
i saw an old post of yours that contained a misconception
this is true: everything that is burned produces the same amount of co2.
I will repeat it: everything that is burned creates the same amount of co2.
This is true because people like Lord Thompson, Lord Kelvin, and Avagadro
understood the world and wrote down what they understood.
disgraceful wrote,
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=33864892
don't forget the govt. subsidy for oil. How bout that trillion dollar war in Iraq.
You don't think that war was to make the Iraqis happy?
to which brainless replied,
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=33865085
If the physics of solar and wind were right,
I am sorry but you cant wish thermodynamics to go away and have it so by beleiving.
You give me solar panels ... at 30 percent efficiency and at 30 cents a
kilowatt per sq ft at 1000 watts irradiance and I will buy them.
but dont tell me ... to be poor and wretched so you can be happy with your
new changed laws of thermodynamics
brainles,
what are you "flabbergasted" about?
Yourself, McCain, or Obama?
And why?
> [Obama does not] understand any basic facts
How do you know this?
> does [Obama] understand the difference between clean
> coal meaning no co2 release and clean coal meaning stack
> scubbbers?
"Clean" as used here is confusing.
> does he understand that you generate the same amount of
> co2 per burned carbon from gas or coal or wood?
He probably understands that this statement suggest the
same amount of CO2 is generated from burning gas or coal
or wood, which is not true, neither for unit fuel burnt
nor for unit energy generated.
> does he understand that the greenhouse gas release during
> manufacture of solar panels via solvents and energy
> essentially eliminates any co2 sparing ability of the
> panels?
He likely does not know the manufacturing process but I
trust his common sense tells him that this statement is
not true.
Look at McCain, he said "hydrogen" and "batteries" would
help to reduce the dependance on foreign oil.
> [Obama] said [he would not vote for the surge
> even after he knew it worked] in full view on an unedited
> interview with o reilly on national news. and he repeated
> it . it is very well known
Can provide a transcript?
> [Obama does not] understand any basic facts
How do you know this?
> does [Obama] understand the difference between clean
> coal meaning no co2 release and clean coal meaning stack
> scubbbers?
"Clean" as used here is confusing.
> does he understand that you generate the same amount of
> co2 per burned carbon from gas or coal or wood?
He probably understands that this statement suggest the
same amount of CO2 is generated from burning gas or coal
or wood, which is not true, neither for unit fuel burnt
nor for unit energy generated.
> does he understand that the greenhouse gas release during
> manufacture of solar panels via solvents and energy
> essentially eliminates any co2 sparing ability of the
> panels?
He likely does not know the manufacturing process but I
trust his common sense tells him that this statement is
not true.
Look at McCain, he said "hydrogen" and "batteries" would
help to reduce the dependance on foreign oil.
> [Obama] would not vote for the surge even after he knew it worked
He did not say this, I believe.
I believe he said given the then circumstances he would not
vote for the surge, meaning that in his opinion (and that of
the majority of the military) probability of success was low.
He seems to be a pragmatic man, and I cannot believe that he
would reject an operation when he knows it will be successful.
I feel like an idiot when I have to use Windows
I don't have IE, discarded it
I thank you for trying to help.
I did as instructed but it doesn't work.
MeadCo_Neptune, 165k
Double clicking brings dialog,
"Would you like to install MeadCo's Neptune plug-in?
"No" stops the process,
"Yes" installs the plug-in, and then stops.
Double clicking again repeats this process.
There is a page explaining how to install the plug-in manually (but I can not find the plug-in "npmeadax.dll" on my computer):
http://pcpitstop.com/neptune_about.asp
If you want to give it a try, here's how to install Neptune:
1. From Mozilla/Opera, go to the PC Pitstop Neptune start page, http://www.pcpitstop.com/neptune.asp.
2. The browser will prompt you to download the plug-in if it is not installed. This will take you to the MeadCo site, where you will need to fill out a form and accept their license.
3. Carefully note the instructions at the MeadCo site for installing the plugin. The process is not automatic for most browsers, and you will need to perform some manual steps to install the plug-in.
4. For Mozilla and Firefox, after you download the Neptune file you can proceed one one of two ways. If you have WinZip, you can open the .exe file download with WinZip and extract the npmeadax.dll file to the browser's /plugins folder. Otherwise, run the .exe file, search for npmeadax.dll and move it to the browser's /plugins folder.
> Go to PCPITSTOP and register and run the
> full test on the left side of the screen.
http://pcpitstop.com/
I do see "Full Test" but nowhere anything about registration.
Palin learned by osmosis.
I, too, learned by osmosis. As a student I often read in
bed and put the books under the pillow when I was ready
to sleep. Complicated science stuff was only inches away
from the gray matter in my brain and it was assimilated.
Slow XP, ACE Utilities didn't help, lost files.
My Compaq Presario 6404 became slower and slower. I have
Fix-It-Utilities 6 Professional but didn't use it because
at Amazon someone wrote it is dangerous.
Then I saw on the Dream Machine board ACE Utilities, and I
run the Registry TuneUp a couple of months ago. It didn't
make the computer faster, and later I discovered that the
fax messages were lost.
What should I do? Do I have to fix the problems before I
apply XP service pack 3 or would applying it take care of
them? - I know nothing about Windows and would appreciate
help.
Slow XP, ACE Utilities didn't help, lost files.
My Compaq Presario 6404 became slower and slower. I have
Fix-It-Utilities 6 Professional but didn't use it because at
Amazon someone wrote it is dangerous.
Because this board lists ACE Utilities I trusted it, and I run
the Registry TuneUp a couple of months ago. It didn't make the
computer faster, and later I discovered that the fax messages
were lost.
Would applying the new XP Service Pack fix my problems? -
I know nothing about Windows and would appreciate help.
"with the exception of dialup users (4.87% of our traffic) who will see a slowdown"
This is certainly true; the pages take forever to load.
Pumps and dumps - JimQuinceH has a good sense for such stuff.
Obama is a radical Muslim communist - his earlobes betray him.
"NO politics!..that is, no politics when i post it."
It seems you make a valid point.
"I have responded, are you ok?"
SpeckiesTrader,
In #msg-27337557 I had asked,
"How did this happen," referring to your post,
"Forced a stop loss on VLNC... IDIOTS."
and I repeated this question in #msg-27338092
Then, in #msg-27340586, I told you that "your replies make no sense:"
You had bought at 3.84 with a stop at 3.50,
but then you posted two messages telling,
"Dont use stop losses," and
"I am only going to look at this stock if it falls below 3."
Assuming that you did what you preach you
shouldn't have been stopped out.
And in #msg-27365154 I requested that you explain this or just reply,
"I don't want to respond," but please say something.
So, my question again is, explicitly stated, did you do what you preach?
It appears you sent wool as a substitude for answering my question.
#msg-27365154
Posted by: Fridolin
In reply to: SpeckiesTrader who wrote msg# 15254
Date:3/5/2008 11:56:34 AM
Post #15457
SpeckiesTrader, please respond -
or just reply, "I don't want to respond," but please say something.
#msg-27340586
Posted by: Fridolin
In reply to: SpeckiesTrader who wrote msg# 15323
Date:3/4/2008 3:36:44 PM
Post #15348
SpeckiesTrader,
I had asked, [#msg-27337557]
"How did this happen," referring to your post,
"Forced a stop loss on VLNC... IDIOTS."
I do not understand your replies.
You had bought at 3.84 with a stop at 3.50, but then you posted
two messages telling, "Dont use stop losses," and "I am only
going to look at this stock if it falls below 3." Assuming that
you did what you preach you shouldn't have been stopped out.
Your replies make no sense:
#msg-27337557
"Market Makers are notorious for bumping down pps to trip stop
loss settings on round numbers so that the commission charges
are higher. Its a little "deal" they have going with each other,
ie bankers and market makers."
#msg-27338092
"Was I there to watch that are you asking. MMs trip the bid
lower with "bid whacking" ie setting a lower and lower price
to tempt folks to sell on low volume days, There incentive is
volume whether its buy or sell not to hold the pps up."
Date:3/3/2008 9:44:12 AM
Post # 62
Bought 150 VLNC at 3.84 with insurance at 3.50 ( ie a stop ).
Feel good about that... Happy Days.
Date:3/4/2008 12:41:44 PM
Post # 66
Dont use stop losses to trade this stock the market makers will tease
the price down to that level and you will be stuck paying double
commissions.
Date:3/4/2008 12:42:09 PM
Post # 67
I am only going to look at this stock if it falls below 3 bucks now.
Date:3/4/2008 12:18:34 PM
Post # 15254
Forced a stop loss on VLNC... IDIOTS>
Any idea how much these sales will help:
http://ih.advfn.com/p.php?pid=nmona&cb=1204782968&article=24624980&symbol=N%5EVLNC
Tanfield will purchase up to $70 million of Valence products in
the contract’s first phase.
and
http://ih.advfn.com/p.php?pid=nmona&cb=1204782968&article=24832266&symbol=N%5EVLNC
[VLNC announced] to ship an additional 600 custom modules of [...] energy storage systems for [...] Toyota Prius hybrid vehicles.
Thanks Blue_Horse_Shoe.
http://xml.10kwizard.com/filing_raw.php?repo=tenk&ipage=5505375
I am sorry for writing you didn't respond when in fact you did. But I didn't see your response. Would you please point to it.
I have responded.
I, too, worry about Zeev.
... we are all beginning to worry about you again.
SpeckiesTrader, please respond -
or just reply, "I don't want to respond," but please say something.
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=27340586
Posted by: Fridolin
In reply to: SpeckiesTrader who wrote msg# 15323
Date:3/4/2008 3:36:44 PM
Post #15348
SpeckiesTrader,
I had asked,
"How did this happen," referring to your post,
"Forced a stop loss on VLNC... IDIOTS."
I do not understand your replies.
You had bought at 3.84 with a stop at 3.50, but then you posted
two messages telling, "Dont use stop losses," and "I am only
going to look at this stock if it falls below 3." Assuming that
you did what you preach you shouldn't have been stopped out.
Your replies make no sense:
"Market Makers are notorious for bumping down pps to trip stop
loss settings on round numbers so that the commission charges
are higher. Its a little "deal" they have going with each other,
ie bankers and market makers."
"Was I there to watch that are you asking. MMs trip the bid
lower with "bid whacking" ie setting a lower and lower price
to tempt folks to sell on low volume days, There incentive is
volume whether its buy or sell not to hold the pps up."
Date:3/3/2008 9:44:12 AM
Post # 62
Bought 150 VLNC at 3.84 with insurance at 3.50 ( ie a stop ).
Feel good about that... Happy Days.
Date:3/4/2008 12:41:44 PM
Post # 66
Dont use stop losses to trade this stock the market makers will tease
the price down to that level and you will be stuck paying double
commissions.
Date:3/4/2008 12:42:09 PM
Post # 67
I am only going to look at this stock if it falls below 3 bucks now.
Date:3/4/2008 12:18:34 PM
Post # 15254
Forced a stop loss on VLNC... IDIOTS>
Date: 3/4/2008 2:46:49 PM
Post # 15323
Was I there to watch that are you asking. MMs trip the bid lower
with "bid whacking" ie setting a lower and lower price to tempt folks
to sell on low volume days, There incentive is volume whether its
buy or sell not to hold the pps up
SpeckiesTrader,
I had asked,
"How did this happen," referring to your post,
"Forced a stop loss on VLNC... IDIOTS."
I do not understand your replies.
You had bought at 3.84 with a stop at 3.50, but then you posted two messages telling, "Dont use stop losses," and "I am only going to look at this stock if it falls below 3." Assuming that you did what you preach you shouldn't have been stopped out. Your replies make no sense:
"Market Makers are notorious for bumping down pps to trip stop
loss settings on round numbers so that the commission charges
are higher. Its a little "deal" they have going with each other,
ie bankers and market makers."
"Was I there to watch that are you asking. MMs trip the bid lower
with "bid whacking" ie setting a lower and lower price to tempt
folks to sell on low volume days, There incentive is volume
whether its buy or sell not to hold the pps up."
Date:3/3/2008 9:44:12 AM
Post # 62
Bought 150 VLNC at 3.84 with insurance at 3.50 ( ie a stop ).
Feel good about that... Happy Days.
Date:3/4/2008 12:41:44 PM
Post # 66
Dont use stop losses to trade this stock the market makers will tease the price down to that level and you will be stuck paying double commissions.
Date:3/4/2008 12:42:09 PM
Post # 67
I am only going to look at this stock if it falls below 3 bucks now.
Date:3/4/2008 12:18:34 PM
Post # 15254
Forced a stop loss on VLNC... IDIOTS>
Date: 3/4/2008 2:46:49 PM
Post # 15323
Was I there to watch that are you asking. MMs trip the bid lower with "bid whacking" ie setting a lower and lower price to tempt folks to sell on low volume days, There incentive is volume whether its buy or sell not to hold the pps up
Well, my question was about, "Forced a stop loss on VLNC..."
How did this happen?
Forced a stop loss on VLNC...
How did this happen?
Is this injustice or what?
if you hit another car in the rear, it is your fault, whether you were under your own power or pushed by another vehicle is irrelevant.
Is this decision available on the internet?
I would like to see it.
The thing that surprised me was that although I was stopped when hit, legally my insurance was responsible for the vehicle in front of me that my car was pushed into.
How could that be?
Who said this?
yanjhi wrote
in Post #3907: "i have a lot of dd on HAUP."
Kindly post it.
And in Post #4305: "if HAUP follows its past pattern Janurary should be a BIG month."
Two of the last three Januaries were down.
VLNC - Toshiba
> AFAIK this was a Toshiba breakthrough and a Toshiba battery.
Thanks for your patience.
I went back and now I see that my confusion started with Da's Post #112596, replying to your Toshiba Li battery news,
> that's old news ....2 years old in fact....
> I wouldn't own vlnc if I were you
VLNC - Toshiba
"Considering the huge revenues that Toshiba has, I'm sure that will be peanuts for any upside."
What am I missing?
Who will make this battery, VLNC or Toshiba?
You wrote (Post #113125),
"A new battery that can be recharged to 90 percent capacity in under five minutes and lasts 10 years will start shipping in March, Toshiba Corp. announced this week."
VLNC or Toshiba?
"A new battery that can be recharged to 90 percent capacity in under five minutes and lasts 10 years will start shipping in March, Toshiba Corp. announced this week."
greenehugh wrote, "... coupled with a Bradley 12/22 turn date"
I searched for "Bradley" and found,
http://www.amanita.at/e/faq/e-bradley.htm
"Bradley assigned numerical values to
certain planetary constellations"
Really, planetary constellations predict "turning points
in the financial markets"?
What are the mechanisms that make this happen?
And it gets even weirder: "Inversions (i.e. a high instead
of a low and vice versa) are quite common."
JimQuinceH: "I chart the stock market's momentum on a daily basis, rather than price."
Jim, would you please explain with a few words what "market momentum" is.
Have been at
http://www.imageshack.us/
How do I find this chart,
"Dow Jones Industrials Weekly Semi-log Chart going back to 1960..."?
Does it have a URL?
I got a free 1 month trial
Is this fellow selling Aire's properties?
XNL - Don't know the company, but
And this stuff is cheap, cheap, cheap to make. Just 25 cents a gallon
<http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=11646799>
is rubbish - alone to distill it cost several times that.
"Couldn't understand the lady"
Neither could I - but my hearing is not good.
What is Bradley?
You are right, the chart is now spanning 18 months of different maps -
I think it might be best to show a rolling 52 weeks?
Be a little flexible in case an important point is just outside this time frame.
And could you please make it a little clearer where the predictions start.
For example, there are two predictions represented by green lines, one set
of lines starts in March 04 and another set starts in August 04. Although
these two sets do not overlap, distictly different colors would make it
easier to "read" the graphs. Also, some of the explanatory text overlaps,
though, I believe this is because my computer's OS and the browser I use is
different from what you are using.
BTW, I was curious about http://www.universalblue.de/, but that page only
shows a picture but no link. I assume something is wrong.