Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Wow big jump in BTC/USD at around 8:30 CPI came out hotter than expected
How can there be a short squeeze on a stock that isn't listed. No cusip. If you shorted a stock for $.03/share and its' value went to zero. you made out. There is no covering
My guess is they are issuing certs like a private placement. (No cusip). That's why they can't issue warrants. If there was an agreement with the SEC it would be on the SEC site.
11/05/2021 Certificate of Mailing for ((Non-Appearance Case Review) of 11/05/2021)
Filed by Clerk
11/05/2021 Minute Order ( (Non-Appearance Case Review))
Filed by Clerk
11/03/2021 Opposition (to Motion to Strike)
Filed by NOW SOLUTIONS INC., a Delaware Corporation (Cross-Complainant); VERTICAL COMPUTER SYSTEMS, a Delaware Corporation (Cross-Complainant)
11/03/2021 Opposition (to Demurrer)
Filed by NOW SOLUTIONS INC., a Delaware Corporation (Cross-Complainant); VERTICAL COMPUTER SYSTEMS, a Delaware Corporation (Cross-Complainant)
10/25/2021 Declaration of Demurring Party Regarding Meet and Confer
Filed by Robert Mokhtarian (Cross-Defendant)
10/25/2021 Demurrer - without Motion to Strike
Filed by Robert Mokhtarian (Cross-Defendant)
A lot of motions to strike and opposition to those motions
I just don't get it. if you look at a 1 month chart of SYNA it has gone from 170 to 249. But these guys still waste their time fiddling with this POS. Take the L and move on.
Jason Robins was on Fox business just now. I wasn't able to catch the entire interview. Talked about reinvesting and upgrading the company
I tried to get some old stock certs from Pam-Am as a collectors item. These aren't worth that
8.1% dividend (nominal). If it fall to around 42 I'm all in
yes, you want to buy them. Tell how there is no market. Do you understand what that means NO MARKET
They have no cusip
Nobody wants those patents you simpleton. I've been lamenting my foolishness for investing in this crap. Not like you, buying into every scheme.
P.S. why don't you dump around 200K into this toilet. Put your money were your memristor is.
First it was patents
then IOT
then rival Social Network
Now memristor
Next DOA
I don't see the connection to vcsy. Just another spurious relationship.
The last thing I saw was they were trying to depose someone called MKP (most knowledgeable person) Is that Mokhtarian or some other person? This is getting convoluted and difficult to follow
"1807679460(1-11).pdf"
Does not work. Can you give an update
I don't know I can only speculate. It looks like things in the original complaint or cross complaint. That they are challenging. It could be something significant (IN the complaint)
(not a Lawyer) It looks like they are trying to get stuff kicked out of the complaint or cross complaint. could be stuff they have an exposure to. (but just guessing)
I think lakeshore is still ongoing. They had the judgement to compel discovery (I think)
I didn't know the company was spending a lot of money on lawyers.
In case you don't know this link takes you nowhere.
16 oz tumbler
I don't know what fantasy land you live in, but where I live my investment into this company is worthless, zip, zero, nada. I would advise a hot cup of reality and stop listening to those guys at the other board
For all we know this company is out of business. Debts > assets.
Also we already made our investment in this company and they are currently worth zero
where will we be at $100 dollars a barrel. I see some futures are projecting $200 a barrel
I fail to see your point here. How is something good for Mills good for a Group of shareholders. Unless they cut a deal with him
I'm not a lawyer, but if certain shareholder are suing Mills and that suit is dismissed with Prejudice. Isn't that a good thing for Mills. maybe I'm missing something
" Agreed Motion to Dismiss Defendant William Mills with Prejudice"
Agreed. I bought Boeing at around 97 during the pandemic crash 3/2020. I doubt if it will ever go back there
It seems to me, that there is a reason why lakeshore refused to allow him to be deposed. Maybe to draw this out longer or maybe he knows some damaging stuff. Whatever it is, it was probably worth the price of the sanctions. Just my guess.
So to me it looks like they have won on the issue of depositions and on 2 of the issues involved in the counter suit.
So more depositions and more time
CONCLUSION AND ORDER
The Court orders as follows:
1. The motion to compel the deposition of Lakeshore’s PMK is granted. The deposition shall
occur within thirty (30) days unless the parties stipulate to a different deadline.
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
Civil Division
Central District, Stanley Mosk Courthouse, Department 39
19STCV15381 October 15, 2021
LAKESHORE INVESTMENT LLC., A CALIFORNIA
LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY vs NOW SOLUTIONS
INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION, et al.
9:00 AM
Judge: Honorable Stephen I. Goorvitch CSR: None
Judicial Assistant: R. Mendoza ERM: None
Courtroom Assistant: K. Ghazarian Deputy Sheriff: None
Minute Order Page 8 of 8
2. Lakeshore and its counsel-of-record, Jonathan Nguyen, jointly and severally, shall pay
sanctions in the amount of $2,461.65 within thirty (30) days unless the parties s
They won on all of the issues associated with motion to compel.
So to on Demur and all on compel. That's my reading, but I'm no lawyer
CONCLUSION AND ORDER
At heart, the second amended cross-complaint asserts a claim for breach of contract based upon
the cross-defendants charging compound interest instead of simple interest and making demands
upon that allegedly improper foundation. While the second amended cross-complaint states a
claim for breach of contract, the allegations against Lakeshore do not rise to the level of fraud.
The Court orders as follows:
1. The demurrer to the first cause of action in the second amended cross-complaint—Breach of
Contract against Lakeshore—is overruled.
2. The demurrer to the seventh cause of action, to the extent it asserts a cause of action for
Common Counts: Money Had and Received against Lakeshore, is overruled.
3. The demurrer to the seventh cause of action, to the extent it asserts a cause of action for Unjust
Enrichment against Lakeshore, is sustained.
4. The demurrer to the remaining causes of action against Lakeshore is sustained.
5. The Court declines to afford leave to amend. The cross-complainant has filed three crosscomplaints, to no avail, and the Court previously granted leave to amend. It is clear to the Court
that further amendment would not remedy the defects. This order is without prejudice to the
Looks like we won on 2 and lost on 2. At least that's what it looks like to me
"Joint Ventures" was a question not a statement
A, 2 for 1 will take us to roughly 2 billion shares outstanding
So we can expect a joint venture within the next couple of quarters
Not much of a guess. It says "Hearing on motion to compel discovery"
what are you talking about
We all know this already. Is this your reason for not informing anyone of what progress is being made
It looks to me (just a guess) like someone is dragging their feet with respect to discovery. Thus the reason for these hearings. This is why waiting for the lawsuits is folly. They could take years to resolve
we know this already. This isn't new info. We are 6+ months past that point.
Branson is too much of an ego centric carnival barker to be a spokesman for anything
Maybe I'm missing something here, but neither Ploinks nor VCSY comes up as an entity on linkedin anymore
All this would be great if it happened. How much is realistic. How much is wishful thinking. If we were to weight these two statements. I would weigh (2% on realistic) and (98% on wishful thinking)
Given the 2% realistic (my opinion) I would like to hear one concrete application for VCSY, aside from NOW