Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
DBMM certainly doesn't or did.
They've made that very clear.
Who cares?
They likely won't either after the 'job titles' find out they're not getting paid.
Interest can be negative or positive.
That's why.
Every company on the planet has job titles. Means nothing.
LOL!
What this sorry excuse of a company needs to do is get some money so those 'job titles' can be kept.
That's what's relevant.
That's pretty lame.
At least you acknowledged its a shady pink.
Sigh...
Good nite!
Mute point.
Must be EXACT match or it wont go through. We've been over this 6998 times.
Sellers having the same issue.
LMAO!
But the fact that no one wants it isn't.
ahahah
No I'm saying no one wants it.
HAHAHA!!!
Proves no one wants this stock knowing the incompetence and revocation likely coming.
HAHAHA!!!
'LOL...This stock traded 4000 dollars total in last 2 months'
That is hilarious.
History books for sure.
Already is for most.
Hence the price appreciation.
In the know of the process and how it works...
Does that make sense?
Again and lastly on this topic...
Let us know when you have as you said you would for $50.
Waiting...
GO ahead.
Let us know when you have as you said you were going to do prior to changing your post a few back.
This will be interesting seeing you as the CEO and or President.
Tx in advance.
Let us know when it's been submitted and accepted.
Tx in advance.
Never said they weren't.
Again...being in the know I simply am explaining to you that the judge will make a decision based on the PAST not the PRESENT.
My analogies were fairly clear I thought.
Did what?
Nice last minute change to your post to satisfy your means.
LOL!
Do it and prove it.
Let us know when you have.
Tx in advance.
For which ticker?
When did they tell you ALL could assume to see your name?
If they didn't then please let us know when it is legitimate?
Who said I had any information about DBMM that couldn't be got by anyone in the 'public'?
I simply stated that I know how it works.
Knowledge is king.
Yes an actual judge will be presiding.
It wouldn't happen otherwise.
There's nothing proving they don't either...
I assume Han is still a phantom after his filings on Wyoming?
What people?
How do you know I'm not a judge?
And why do you assume that the judge who will be presiding will negate all previous precedence? It is their duty to inquire about it especially when a decision has been made with similar circumstance by a reputable and upstanding holder of the law?
And that the judge will not take previous incompetence and lack of timely filings into consideration as is the reason why DBMM is in the situation they are?
Yes the judge does make the final decision even if it is challenged.
Exactly my point.
There's nothing to debate.
DBMM were delinquent and with lousy excuses.
'After' effects don't matter.
They didn't play by the rules.
I can't commit tax evasion, say 'sorry I'll start paying taxes' and walk away like it didn't happen.
From you...
'Which at first had very little chance. Until they became current at which their chances became better.'
You have no idea about that.
Again...they are being judged on their past not the present.
They only hoped that the present filings, not current by the way and SEC questioned, would sway the judge in their favor.
Not unlike continuously robbing banks, getting caught but writing a note to the judge to say that you won't do it anymore in hopes that he/she gives hugs and says 'its ok I forgive'.
In an accountable system that won't fly.
'If'.
Current'cy' now does not negate the fact that they were 'un'current and careless for so long.
Last official statement from SEC stated that the filings were sloppy, not verbatim by the way but you just need to do some dd to get the gist.
Most incompetent, crashing pink ever?
Facts don't matter.
Whatever the amount and price. As long as they match.
What is so hard to understand?
Sigh.
Greys do not allow trades unless they are IDENTICAL.
MM's have nothing to do with it!
Whether you want to buy or sell you need to match precisely hence the reason for going grey's.
It is a form of punishment towards the s/h's for the most part because of incompetence of said management.
Weak...
It's my right and I don't appreciate incompetence and failure in the stock world or any other including this fantasy.
Why are you here?
Again who is they? MM's don't play in the greys?
I don't believe in dreams, only reality.
I will stay a 'negative' as you call it as long as you keep pumping this failure so you can get out.
Fair enuf?
O.k.
I'll waste my time looking for 'they'.
Revocation is coming.
S/h's are trying to get out at whatever it costs as opposed to losing everything.
Obviously.
Can u name 1?
Who is 'they'?
Agreed.
This is a fantasy.
Won't happen in the real world.
Someone obviously who wants out.
Who else?