Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
While the CRTC’s March 22nd decision is frustrating for MVNOs, Bishay noted that it was positive for another of his businesses, Ice Wireless, which owns infrastructure and is thus considered a ‘facilities-based’ carrier. The CRTC rewarded smaller wireless entrants who have invested in facilities by announcing that the final rates for wholesale roaming services are between 44 percent and 99 percent lower than the interim rates that have been in place since 2015. Plus, the new mandated roaming rates are retroactive to May 2015, meaning that smaller players who already hold roaming agreements with Bell, Telus and Rogers can expect a hefty refund in the mail.
Read more at MobileSyrup.com: What the CRTC’s Wi-Fi-first MVNO decision means for Canadian consumers
pf changs accept crypto?
if theres a watter shortage and u have purchased 50 megawatters. guess how much ur watter is worth? now when btc goes up how much? but u understand why they want the stock to go down as do they also the price of btc. but how much time do u get for ur well to produce? 2 months is an outrageous unrealistic time frame and along the way there is plenty
to write home about. in my opinion, the price of btc is the only thing that can deny them. and i am bullish on the bearing of 12 months to a year and a half of this price. .10 cents they wont have to wait 1 month to get a hefty return but theyll sell then buy again till theyre consolidated up the wazoo. me my sum is in there. ike uk said it was the shot worth taking and ill see it out fairly. but maybe a lot of people bought just for the telecom and dont understand bitcoin. i doubt it. but they prevent everyone from selling with 2 million shares at 50 percent off for a while. bluffing. now companies will want to pay even more for hosting but guess what well charge them even less cuz were morons
i mean thats the bomb. demand goes up and supply goes down which drives prices up. tnw was already bdc. its the same thing u sought after only with electricity and the dome instead of telecom data. u wont be able to sell mobile smart phone customers their phone can mine the giga token and save them oodles but if u got at & t in florida or tennessee at & t is only in 13 u.s. states for internet and phone and tv.
they coNstantly need partners thats why theyre trying to merge with time warner.
arent they a quasi mvno themselves they would be in business with mvnos. anyone hu doesnt build their own network with the big 3 isNt an mvno. if they do, that makes them an mvno. Thats not the problem. its the big 3 wanting significant payment for playing network operator and switching folks back on even as an insurance policy. At & T e.g. still has to use rogers. T-Mobile limited their unlimited plan and added an extra fee to maintain unlimited.
True other private networks are used and do the same thing but the big 3 sees themself as more fundamental and seeks worthy compensation so the crtc will define this role more specifically in the year. in the meantime the big 3 have to have data plans and have only a month to negotiate. then the public gets to gripe about their proposals. The tnw private network though is really enhanced with apps and backhauls that make business with them likely eventhough specifically they arent mentioned in the crtc report.
to me, this is beautiful news. 1. its positive. 2. it can even get more positive. 3. its fast. i like the decision it cuts into everyones stake like it should but its functional. Instead, the CRTC has ordered the Big Three carriers to provide proposals for lower-cost, data-only plans (which would not include voice calling services) by April 23. CRTC Chairman Ian Scott told reporters Thursday this is a "superior alternative" to allowing WiFi-based providers to access roaming services, saying there would have been many complicated details to work out in such an approach.
"[The low-cost data plans] will be available nationally and quickly. It would have taken considerably more time to amend the existing framework – perhaps as much as 18 to 20 months – to enable the WiFi/roaming approach. Whereas this can be done in a matter of months and I expect them to be in place in this calendar year certainly."
The CRTC on Thursday also set new, lower prices for wholesale roaming for regional carriers – such as Freedom Mobile, which operates in British Columbia, Alberta and Ontario, and Videotron, based in Quebec – which do have their own networks but must access the national carrier's networks when their customers travel.
The commission also said it will kick off a thorough review of the overall framework of wholesale wireless services. That framework was last reviewed in 2015 and at the time the CRTC said it would not mandate roaming access for MVNOs (mobile virtual network operators) who do not build their own networks. Mr. Scott said the CRTC will now begin the next review earlier than planned.
not a year old, when it was published this is yesterday. it blatantly states u can leverage wifi home and stipulates wholsale roaming final rates making them even lower to provide for the economic conoetitors viability. only thing it states is that they dont have to sell to tnw.
but thats the whole point in a gentlemanly way. and within the year they will study the whole framework of the home infrastructure. i mean its like at & t gets it and then they sell to tnw and they say i didnt know it was for tnw. but basically its ruling in favor of the home wifi leveraging i dunno lowry wont respond but u at least have that. if thats all they needed then its a complete green light. the discrepancy gets greedy when they still need big 3 carrier service outside the non roaming territory and supplement it to a i dunno a private network leveraging that same big 3 so they only have to pay once instead of twice.
this is why they were blacklisted. but i think data only negates the blacklist. thats all they need https://www.canada.ca/en/radio-television-telecommunications/news/2018/03/crtc-continues-to-foster-investment-innovation-and-affordable-choice-in-the-wireless-market.html
like my last post im allowed today, this says april deployment & nothing can stop them http://www.multi-gigabit-ethernet.com/news/2017/03/06/8506980.htm
http://wireless.tnwcorp.com/plans/
but business solutions internatiinally are a go when wifi wont count as roaming
so voice and text are unlimited and u can call over that hooked to wifi. send data to computers etc over wifi.
the only catalysts are btc proce and the second domes completion offering mining contracts. small early april catalyst but the biggest catalyst may be tnws revenues. they were just acquired in june. none of their revenues are on the quarterly report. or how many shares were exchanged in acquiring them but that was done june.
now u have full speed ahead data plans being launched by tnw this march and now home wifi is off limits to the big 3 so the office wifi is too and public wifi.
im sure thats why they acquired them and blockchain they want to reinvent with their business solutions packages. but hey need to operate at a profit. tnw 350 m in equity.
It also lowered the maximum wholesale rates that they can charge to other carriers that use their networks, from the levels set on an interim basis in December 2015
why is this bad...tnw was launching in march and they have plenty of equity and are owned by unitedcorp. theyll sell to tnw now because they wont permanently roam and tnw will take advantage of that with their innovation
so they got rogers to cave but not telus and bce
i think thats the problem as the yukon isnt mr. population where rogers footprint is.
ah here it is. its still all good for tnw because they are mandating giving the big 3 rogers is a big 3 my mistake, 1 month to come uo with cheaper data only plans which tnw offers anyway. crtc not mandating incumbents to open up their networks to smaller players that offered service over Wi-Fi first, but relied on the incumbents’ infrastructure when customers lost Wi-Fi connections. These providers don’t build complete facilities-based networks. As it stands, the Big Three may enter into agreements to provide such services, but it is not mandatory.
further specific, the routing to a yukon wifi backhaul technology for voice mail and texts is the most challenging to recognize. rogers isnt a big 3 hu allows them that backhaul wifi voicemail and text. mandating wholesale roaming means tnw is in business regardless. But the voicemail in a cloudwifi app spiel saves customers data rates via a wifi connectivity. Texting too. But i thiNk outside the big 3 footprint, u have the deal with to offer wholesale roaming u must connect with them but u dont if u connect thru anothers network. public wifi or rogers i imagine. so u have to design connectivity that doesnt use the big 3 to connect to rogers undetected and untaxing.
TNW says that its proprietary iPCS “smartphone-over-IP” technology that allows for its subscribers to connect to a WiFi network to route voice calls and text messages over the spectrum that it owns in Northern B.C. and the Yukon. Their subscription plans provide a finite amount of data that is consumed over the month on whatever the customer chooses. When a WiFi connection isn’t available, TNW would need a wholesale roaming agreement with a local network provider to provide service.
so maybe they have mandated it but clarified the incidental roaming. so u can jimmy it via home wifi and pubkic wifi and of course they must offer wholesale roaming. the crtc is also very much embracing innovation of those companies offering those plans. and next up will be 5g. The Commission also confirmed that mandated wholesale roaming was intended to provide the end-users of other wireless carriers with only incidental, not permanent, access to the national wireless carriers’ networks, and that it would be inconsistent with the wholesale wireless framework to permit mandated wholesale roaming to be used as a means to obtain permanent access. In addition, the Commission determined that allowing permanent network access via wholesale roaming would render meaningless the determination in the wholesale wireless framework not to mandate MVNO access, and would require the Commission to fundamentally redefine the meaning of wholesale roaming.
The Commission also clarified that public Wi-Fi access does not form part of a home network for the purpose of establishing what constitutes incidental use of the national wireless carriers’ networks under the wholesale roaming tariffs. The Commission noted that public Wi-Fi is provided over facilities that are not owned or operated by wireless service providers, and that there are not necessarily any contractual or other arrangements between the owners and operators of Wi-Fi networks and the service providers that use them to deliver telecommunications services to retail end-users. Accordingly, the Commission considered that the availability, quality, and reliability of such facilities could not be assured in any meaningful way. Further, including public Wi-Fi access in the definition of “home network” would undermine the policy objectives of mandated wholesale roaming, since it would discourage wholesale roaming customers from investing in facilities.
so like if voice wasnt limited but unlimited u could use an app that had google search maybe and stuff and ur data usage is minimal obviously
but thatd be a first voip google search app.
to reiterate the jist ifound tnw planned to begin offering data only plans in march. tnw has 350m in equity. in june the crtc rejected their request for 2 things. 1 thing was actually accepted yest. by the crtc albeit merely in recognizing the need to clarify incidental connectivity wendys, mcdonalds, from permanent outside the big 3s footprint.
data plans will be 10 bucks for 500mb 2.95 for 100mb. phone voice equals 6 min per 1 mb so 3000 minutes for 10 bucks and they roll over.
but in establishing the roaming permanance limitation the 2 of the 3 may offer roamings wholesale to tnw but they arent mandated to now that they wont be afraid of jimmying the permanent connectivity.
tnw also has several apps they claim
i dont know how exactly this makes them the definitive first name in low cost smart phone service because u still cant jimmy but those are good rates. i got 500 mb from at & t unlimited talk and text for
20 bucks seeing how unlimited is still 50bucks and tons of start up fees
so its like this, its weird but its like this.... the footprint of a provider hu sells wholesale roaming packages, is concerned hu they sell to will abuse the area and switch on customers permanently using wifi connectivity evading cellular charges.
so the crtc yes u can not do this on a permanent basis if ur outside that footprint. but if they sell to the mvno that area the mvno can offer it on a permanent basis as long as theyre in that footprint. i dont know how they get coverage outside the footprint i mean if u get coverage u get coverage but that was the moral jist of it. wholesalers vs the big 3 and limiting the innovation to outside that agreed upon footprint. duh.
must read again & again too. but basically thats it.
uama via tnw network wants to offer a wifi like space station u can connect to aside from wendys mcdonalds the mall and anyone offering free wifi it seems. thus its inferior but that much less inferior to big 3 unlimited connectivity. the part where their reluctant to offer tnw connectivity because theyll subsidize their permanent unlimited connectivity is i guess the core of the argument. someone will offer it to tnw if they can and then tnw will have the biggest in in affordable mobile smart phone connectivity. if i have that right.
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=http://unitedcorp.com/tnw-wireless-files-part-1-application/&ved=2ahUKEwic_v_MhYHaAhXOm-AKHa-kATsQFjAAegQIBxAB&usg=AOvVaw3rjk4lGXsNnenC_YtJ7LEM
when i had limited
sometimes i forgot to use wifi and went on youtube.
crtc said it will emphasize and regulate this as a standard choice. thats what uama wished.
of course their gonna use wifi if available. like why be put on hold with limited theyll just put u on hold on purpose duh. wifi is an equalizer. i dont know how uama gains or loses on that reiterated crtc value. apps that use data
aside from voice like one to buy and sell giga coin and still orefer to use wifi will be allowed moreso to use it without roaming charges. thats a plus for uama. so why the sell off? uk? the news came at 4pm after the sell off. was this dude just a nervous wreck over this?
besides that, they wished to incorporate that with the giga coin. ooooo wow. like hus gonna buy the giga coin anyway
so basically the patent is worthless
it was a longshot anyway contingent upon a resubmittal to open the ipsc
after they allowed something they previously didnt. only then would it have mattered monetarily to the patent.
the ruling suggests 5g is the future and they aim to keep it affordable and thats their role in regulatory offerings and expect others to get a life and a real mobile network plan.
this prompted 1 million share sell off at 20 percent off. kind of pathetic.
why is everyone clapping and cheering at the closing bell? talk about whackos disconnected
not today dont wanna give away their antisell disguise
i dont like the options lawry is giving us
nor the market makers for that matter or the otc or japanese or u.s. or china
i do know its damned if u do damned if u dont
and blathering has nothing to do with it
all my investment is in education
ill let god decide what has happened here
and where mark zuckerberg belongs and edward snowden
maybe someone died
and they have to sell
there doesnt seem to be much to talk about
on their side
just stop
u had me at cognitive dissonance
perhaps its like u scored a touchdown but no one will admit it cuz their biased but 4 months from now theyll all admit it
and ur not gonna give in when u know u scored right? 7 months is too long a period of time personally thats an nyse stock but im not gonna go backwards8
1000 miners at 8k ea. is 8m
so 1500 miners vs 1400 of mara equals about .8 divided by 2.8 to compensate for the 15m deficit to 5
.8 divided by 2.8 equals roughly .3 by july 1 at current btc
right now if no shares added and no debt for the 3rd dome i.e. 5 million in debt
the 3rd dome by july 4 say would give us at current btc prices a valuation of at least .4
so if that announcement comes
we'd have 1500 miners july 4
via completion of dome 3.
mara has 1400 miners 10times less shares
but 28 million in deficit to our 5
valuation is 1.6 so 1.6 x 5 =8 divided by 10x fewer os = .8
i would say though it may be wishful thinking because of that price tag .... the pps is .18 to .20 but what do u think it is if all remains the same with the btc price at may 1? bearing in mind no financials showing revenues
2nd dome not offering contracts yet
and maybe news on 3rd ones lease site or whatever and plans to implement say 1000 miners of course. may 1 isnt looking so ripe is my estimate and if the pps doesnt go up and volume does were gonna get trampled and replaced by tyrants
i estimate the greenhouse to be 3600 square feet. no health canada license is gonna be sought after for that miniscule a greenhouse. but a hosting agreement for that what would that bring. to me the montreal energy tzar made a statement to mining operations in quebec think again he said u have to have blockchain innovation u cant just be mining. so i think maybe its a ploy to satisfy that tyrant
q2 filings wont be out till july
by then a lot can happen
but as a going concern they cant just whip out 10 million for miners and another dome. how many domes can they put on each leased space?
maras kickin ass theyre in quebec mining with 3k i think 2 to 3 k
as for volume and qb otc upgrade
u dont need an institutional investor like the nyse but it would help i think. we minority shareholders have to form that institution which wont count they wanna see volume and value go up as do we.
thats a given but a proper accounting needs to appraise the hosting agreement.
the 3 domes wont be up for a bit so u just have that one and that one may waive the hosting fee for woodland cuz they gave them funding. i mean being said equity is equity they need to disclose that
i think the guy is right but 1000 miners is several million. hardly rinky dink.
what we need to find out is how much a hosting agreement nets blockchain data centers bdc and unitedcorp. so when it happens again we can forecast equity. they seem reluctant to divulge this info. its all a wildcard but if they knew this guy prior and that the only hosting job so far i would more enthusiam in the dome by complete outsiders and to know what that hosting agreement is worth.
also i imagine it will quite sometime before they roll out contracts to the public. june if ur lucky. is that the main revenue maker plus their own mining facility and when that will be. unless a hosting agreement is substantial we wont get volume till may. unless btc squares off. just to reiterate, the guy points out as does the update woodlawn is already an investor so its strange they wont even on demand tell us how much a hostong agreement is worth. a lot of companies report each deal being worth this much. we have a right to know exacly this specific information
so we have to find out how much a hosting agreement is worth
really? can i get ur shares at half off after uve been waiting 4 months and great news just came out ?