Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
1hot toddy :Where do you get those numbers? Do you have a link to that?
Finally gap closed from june 11th
Oh, did you buy at the top?
Increased by 595% since 2020!!!
Rather, i ask myself: who buys all that?
Voluntary or imposed by court
Amaie Pumpkin, so much knowledge........ Don't understand what you're doing here on this forum!
Positive divergence = BULLIC signal. Hopefully you've bought it!
Oeie, graph says something completely different..........
Take a look at the chart!!! The longs are disappointed by the price drop, not by the general meeting. At least I don't.
Don't understand why the shorts here are so euphoric? Everyone can see from the graph that the attack to drive the price lower already started before the start of the explanation. And this while the longs were at a general meeting or watching the presentation. "My" conclusion is that the decline had nothing to do with the general meeting. I bought more.
Proto, I didn't say anything wrong.... I just turned Zdog to Bard when he was looking for an answer
Mr Zdog, ask Bard your question(What, that Lwlg dropped polymers in favor of GaN?)and see for yourself what the answer is.....
No, that there are qualified PDK
That's your interpretation, I have a different one.....
i know
Why did I lose all credibility (even though I never had one). I'm just posting here what I found with Bard. Have I ever mentioned that I am a connoisseur? No! You're posting here too... Do you mean you're the connoisseur?
KEEP TRYING.....
That's your interpretation, I have a different one.....
Yes, the Kinzaman-Bard explanation will be the right one! I started searching with Bard because Teddy and someone else here claimed there wasn't a qualified pdk yet. And despite the fact that I'm a layman, I'm more confident in Bard's answer than Teddys
Surely everyone can see that it's Bard, it's up to the reader to verify as well!! I ask several questions of Bard and also ask for his sources...... But I'm not a connoisseur!
I'm not the right person to answer that....
BARD!!!!!!
Are GaN-on-Si PICs Lightwave Logic technology?
Yes, GaN-on-Si PICs are Lightwave Logic technology. The company has a number of patents on the GaN-on-Si technology and is one of the leading companies in the development of this technology.
Lightwave Logic has developed a number of GaN-on-Si PICs for a wide range of applications, including optical communications, data centers, and industrial automation. The company has also developed a number of PDKs that customers can use to design and fabricate their own GaN-on-Si PICs.
Lightwave Logic's GaN-on-Si technology has the potential to reduce the cost and complexity of developing photonic integrated circuits. This could lead to a wider adoption of photonic technologies in a wide range of applications.
Here are some examples of GaN-on-Si PICs that have been developed by Lightwave Logic:
200G and 400G optical transceivers: These transceivers are designed for use in 200G and 400G optical communication systems.
Mux/demux devices: These devices are used to combine or split different optical signals.
Optical switching devices: These devices are used to switch optical signals.
Industrial optical sensors: These sensors are used to detect and measure light.
Lightwave Logic continues to invest in the development of GaN-on-Si PICs. The company plans to develop new PICs for even faster and more powerful applications.
BARD!!!!!
Which PDKs is LWLG currently working on and which are already qualified?
Lightwave Logic's PDKs
Lightwave Logic is currently working on a number of PDKs, including:
200G and 400G optical communications PDK: This PDK is designed for the development of GaN-on-Si photonic integrated circuits (PICs) for 200G and 400G optical communications. The PDK is already qualified and is available to customers.
800G optical communications PDK: This PDK is designed for the development of GaN-on-Si PICs for 800G optical communications. The PDK is still in development, but is expected to be qualified in 2024.
1.6T optical communications PDK: This PDK is designed for the development of GaN-on-Si PICs for 1.6T optical communications. The PDK is still in development, but is expected to be qualified in 2025.
Infrared PDK: This PDK is designed for the development of GaN-on-Si PICs for infrared applications. The PDK is still in development, but is expected to be qualified in 2026.
Lightwave Logic's PDKs are based on the company's GaN-on-Si technology. This technology has a number of advantages over traditional materials and technologies for photonic integrated circuits, including:
High speed: GaN-on-Si PICs can reach speeds of up to 100 Gbps.
Low power: GaN-on-Si PICs consume less power than PICs based on other materials.
Large-scale manufacturing: GaN-on-Si PICs can be manufactured on a large scale, which can reduce costs.
Lightwave Logic's PDKs have the potential to reduce the cost and complexity of developing photonic integrated circuits. This could lead to a wider adoption of photonic technologies in a wide range of applications, including optical communications, data centers, and industrial automation.
Qualified PDKs
As of October 18, 2023, Lightwave Logic has one qualified PDK:
200G and 400G optical communications PDK: This PDK is qualified and is available to customers.
Under development PDKs
Lightwave Logic has three PDKs that are still under development:
800G optical communications PDK: Expected to be qualified in 2024.
1.6T optical communications PDK: Expected to be qualified in 2025.
Infrared PDK: Expected to be qualified in 2026.
Why is that manipulation? Prototype has cited source anyway....... Manipulation according to ME is: Saying that the technology does not work and that the stock will become a penny again.... And that without a source!
Proto, I'm with you, but only have my wife's car(=Lada) to sell! Every little bit helps.... No?
We all know: Teddy=manipulator
Teddy,again your insinuation......keep trying