Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
HSN's supplier, our distributor
did a quick search for arca... cant quite find anything i find relevant except the australian retail credit agency... can you unpack that acronym for me?
Your 2001 link isnt a link to the 2001 guidance btw, looks like its 2006 since they reference 2005 docs, but there's no date for the release on it
see, except your whole argument rests on this little bit of fudging that an ffiec guidance is equal to an industry standard. some forward thinking companies may take ffiec guidances as an industry standard, but it does not make it officially so.
they set the guidances and standards, and many guidances set by ffiec become standards. many companies use the ffiec guidances as standards.
HOWEVER
an ffiec guidance is not a standard.
the car is the authentication
whoa
Much ado about nothing here. Push is not a new technology but a standard to be expected-I was actually surprised it hadn't already been implemented in MobileTrust.
That being said, glad to see its not just a sales operation over there, continuous dev work is happening!
but if badgering a ceo and forcing him to respond on your whims is wasting his valuable time and minimizing shareholder value... he's not maximizing shareholder value, which is what the shareholders actually want...
did you read the 10k? Just because they are taking a higher salary doesn't mean they're not forgiving all of it
Except their executives, who are forgiving their paychecks as capital contributions.
i called into fidelity and they read me the riot act, then i accepted and off i went
did you read the same 10K I did?
Capital Contribution
In January 2016, the Company’s officers forgave an aggregate total of $762,275 of accrued payroll due to them from the Company. The Company recorded the forgiveness of accrued payroll as a capital contribution.
it wasnt a good deal. it was the deal that had to be made to create a partnership and keep the company afloat. Strikeforce isn't a penny stock for nothing, mark had to make some deals that looked really bad if you're thinking short term. long term goals, the company cant fail, because then the assets are sold off and everyone loses the chance to cash in.
due to the prevalence of the ooba authentication occurring in the marketplace, sfor decided to keep the '698 because they could not only cash in on lawsuits but also licensing deals. keylogger protection is good, but ooba is better.
Also 1.6 million in notes paid off... great allocation of the unnamed party's settlement *cough* Microsoft *cough*
its also possible that a previous contract/sale that was added to the unaudited quarterly got removed after an audit.
are you looking at Other income(expense) net on F-3?
9 mnill from microsoft minus lawyers fees
in the 10K it says ACS has the option to purchase the patent for 9 million by october 2020. they can either buy it or pay 15% per license until that point. If ACS has made any movements to purchase, must have been this Q12017
or in very short time, if the right acquirer comes along!
And let's not forget it's a major holiday weekend! grandma turns on hsn in the background for the whole family to watch!
I expect so! Gmail was my real life introduction to MFA 4 years ago on their rollout... not quite the 15 years the patent has been around
I don't need Kay to tell me that this authentication will be used everywhere... I don't know if you guys used Gmails 2factor, but I have since they rolled it out. My first use, it was obvious to me that it was the best thing in authentication protocols since the username and password.
Finding sfor felt like the best episode of antiques roadshow ever, commonly used protocol in plain sight actually worth millions!
Where does MK golf? I bet he has a course that's a great value for your money :)
I like the sentiment... but how can you have 1000 Fortune 500?
really just depends on how the existing contracts are written, if Mark was smart he's already set everything up for a seamless handoff
Thats a problem for the buyer and Mcafee to work out, but the buyer will acquire all existing licensing deals and contracts. If the buyer pulls the contract and doesnt allow for Mcafee to use it, well... sucks to be mcafee
its hard to buy the dip when it keeps going up!
i did fix his name tho, almost missed it 8)
Just sent this off to Dan Coats!
Dear Dan Coates,
*Personal Background* This background is so you know I am an informed citizen in the most important new theater of war, cybersecurity.
Ignoring the email scandal, DNC infiltration, 'Russiagate' and any future political information leaks, cybersecurity is still integral to the safety of our troops. Nearly everyone in our government has a cell phone. I assume these cell phones have some sort of security, but if they are not using Out of Band Authentication(OOBA) they are still susceptible to a majority of malware attacks. This majority uses man in the middle attacks with a keylogger to divert authentication information to a 3rd party without alteration, so the 3rd party can capture and reuse it. The most successful way to prevent these attacks is with OOBA.
Currently, many software services use OOBA, but there is only one company that is legally allowed via patent to use this authentication technique, and that is Strikeforce Technologies. I use their MobileTrust product and fully recommend it. Strikeforce Tecnologies has not done business with the U.S. Government but have allied themsleves with ACS, a channel reseller and an existing DoD contractor. If you value the safety of our troops, their GPS locations, their personal information and the classified information sent to them, I implore you to consider Strikeforce Technologies as the option for utmost security.
Regards,
anEmptyBottle
think sfor should file suiot against SO?
anyone read this gizmodo artice about patents and print cartidges? i think $sfor falls under different regulations as software, but a surprisingly parallel case nonetheless
http://gizmodo.com/supreme-court-printer-cartridge-case-could-be-the-citiz-1793643311
let us know if anyone pulls an ellison and buys an SFOR island!
I would be ecstatic if it was a tax free stock swap with the buyer, gives us the most options for liquidity
i just see them as devils advocate..if they can find any information about the company, i find it useful. if its positive, negative, whatever. i want a full view of the company, not a rose tinted one.
can these companies take on debt and buy licenses for reselling to prop up sfor earnings?