Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
My apologies.
But in my defense, my use of the word is generally not man as in male human. But man as in the creature, man (human) of which there are male and female.
Good 'woman' :D
Got caught sitting on the bid.
Only have a starter. Will keep this on watch.
Good info.
Good man.
Can't be sure why or for what reason. It just is rather obvious from the chart. Besides the diluting MMs sitting in L2, the pop and fade pattern is emblematic of just that. Otherwise, it should be capable of holding at least some of its gains.
Those charts are very very different.
These guys are diluting like it's going out of style.
Look at the accumulation by volume on both before the breakout.
Look at the accumulation by volume on BRYYF.
Sell with the diluting MMs and buy back when it is sold back down.
You can use this to build a free/lowcost position and let that sit.
1. There are very few big tech companies with affordable pricing. So the cost of entry makes options an appealing alternative.
2. More and more people understand how to trade them (perhaps not how to manage the risk).
3. These were previously something for more sophisticated investors but now every robinhood account can trade them with zero transaction cost.
4. There's also the increase in information availability. The days of paying for a broker's Porsche so you can afford a ford at retirement are long gone.
You have to ask yourself what stops him from RS BEFORE the merger. Anger the answer is nothing.
Agreed.
And this will be clearly disclosed moving forward.
Let's clarify.
My comment is not addressed to Lazar.
My comment is addressed to other shell players or new wouldbe Lazar shell players specifically.
Each strategy has its life-cycle. Nothing lasts forever. This one, IMHO, has reached its peak and will see a sharp decline in returns.
Lazar can do whatever he wants, and so can we.
Moving forward, I will be explicitly blunt in my response to any posts peddling moonshot or pie in the sky dreams on this board about Lazar tickers.
Lazar can do whatever he wants ... and so can I.
You are missing the point.
We are all here to turn a profit at each stage.
You buy a shell with the promise of it being worth something more or with the potential of being worth more once it's cleaned. This is what you sell to the next holder.
With this potential value being eviscerated, you become the bagholder.
This has nothing to do with Lazar. It has everything to do with those of us who found playing his shells lucrative.
If you read that as promo, then you read it wrong.
I mean, look at the ignoramuses running tickers from 50M OS to 10B here in the good ole, grit eating US of A.
Look at AITX, BRKK, and the list goes on.
Looks to me like scum doesn't have a race or nationality.
That's absolutely not being over-dramatic.
That's being as real as it gets.
Previously it was a reasonable position, but moving forward, i don't see how this does not affect Lazar's brand.
I simply cannot recommend his tickers to anyone in good conscience anymore.
And this will likely ripple across ALL his tickers and explains the recent trend of significant pullback i've noted in CERPQ, XNNHQ (thanks for the cheapies though), LICH, etc.
Try ordering it through etrade pro.
Pro tip:
Reuse a called in order. This works on thinkorswim.
If you called in in the past, look for that order and reuse it.
Oh man.
I feel bad for whoever it was.
Hopefully it helps them become a better trader.
(sincere request) Can you please explain your reasoning?
If there is worse information on corona over the weekend, then every chart will breakdown. But can you share what you see in $ROKU chart that indicates 100? I can see 115/118 conforming with higher lows based on weekly.
They also have earnings in less than 2 weeks.
As someone else said, it's not a hundred percent. But big boards stay true to chart fundamentals so hitting 10000% returns is not a rarity with options trading. I'm not one to paint colorful pictures so I'll tell you 100% losses are also quit frequent. But if you have an edge, you will come out with remarkable profits consistently.
I ignored your previous response because it seems you have taken my posts to mean something they are not. Everyone is here to make money and I don't engage in unnecessary exchanges.
The core ideas were exchanged. Suggesting that me pointing out the inevitable to n00bs to avoid unrealistic immediate moonshots, is some plot to get cheap shares was unwarranted.
Yes, we are all here because it has potential. But that's all it is until it becomes actualized. But anything can and will happen before then. So risk management and proper strategies should be employed.
Look at IDAD. I still have a tail from my first initial buy about a year ago. But had I held on the entire time that investment would still only be up 1000%. I make that in a day in many plays on OTC or options.
The factor you have forgotten is time. It's not just about percentage gain or initial capital, the biggest ingredient is time. The compounding effect of time at a lower interest will always outgrow a simple interest no matter how big.
I used the 3 month example just for illustration. To hit 10x here, we are looking at a year minimum. And it will not be a straight path.
Yes. This is true. You adjust your block size accordingly. Say you had a good feeling (it is all just a feeling until it is actualized) then you take a heavier initial block. With the first wave of confirmation, you take *profits* and leave a sufficiently sized block.
It's a not seeing the forest for the trees issue.
Illusions of massive gains is what gets us trapped in losing positions.
Compounding as little as 30% repeatedly over the same proposed 2 month hold will yield as much as 13000%
Say this becomes a 10 bagger. Great. If you 'invested' 1k, you have now banked 10000. You waited 2-3 months (not guaranteed btw) but you made money. Good for you.
In the same 3 months, you can find 10 plays where you net 30% on each play. This, in the otc, is not difficult. Your closing account value should be 1000 *(1.3)^10 > 10000.
In this race, the turtle wins. Taking consistent, realistic profits over a shorter time period is significantly more profitable than sequestering capital for a big payout that may never come.
JMHO. GLTA!
Putting up support and not selling into the bid.
I honestly am not following this one. I've been in enough of them to know how to determine its value based on chart.
Just find a good entry and exercise caution (aka take profits).
I play custodianships because I am uninterested in stories and moon-shot promises. It is purely transactional. This is a dead shell; it trades at X. There is potential for it to be more than a shell; it should trade at a price higher than X. What that price is, I don't know and honestly don't care. As long as it is higher than X.
I will start paying attention to the actual story once it is able to break specific milestones (read as resistance levels).
This dipped as low as .0025 and hit .0092. that's more than 300%. Anyone advising anyone not to take profit will likely not last in the otc. Does it have potential? Sure. But nothing is guaranteed. nothing goes straight up either. With the mm games and what not, why hold ur entire position and watch gains evaporate instead of selling a good chunk to reload even stronger at a cheaper price?
I've played these custodianships for a while, without support they will simply march it back down as low as longs are willing to allow it.
It's otc. People lying is not novel.
Most people take profits when they see it.
Older publication (2003): Hydrogen fertilization of soils – is this a benefit of legumes in rotation?
More recent publication (2017): The Tale of a Neglected Energy Source: Elevated Hydrogen Exposure Affects both Microbial Diversity and Function in Soil
This 'HYGRO' molecular hydrogen and oxygen delivery system is a bit of a big deal IMHO.
I am seeing PAUL on L2 at .0012 yesterday. Why is he there? $QUTR.
CERPQ is a Lazar custodianship play.
The ticker has been brought current and will likely lose its Q whenever it progresses to the point of sale where a new company will be merging in.
Anything to do with "Cereplast Inc" (the previous company) is irrelevant.
Good to see you here buddy.
Yes. The share structure here is likely making a few hesitant to get in.
5 million shares traded in first min took this from .0013 to .0018.
Using a formula based on my experience, a significant portion of the OS is not trading. So what is the approximate float? If you want to guesstimate, you can look at similar tickers and the volume/price-action over the same price range to get a sense of just how small it is.
Note: the ATH annual volume on this ticker is 345M.
ATH annual volume for $TRDX? 1B (prior to Lazar) and 2.7B the year he filed (which is understandable given increased swing/day trading).
Welcome. I've been in this since filing at .0006.
I am still buying as of this morning.
Welcome new holders.
If you are not familiar with Lazar custodianships, please feel free to ask questions. There is also a Lazar board on ihub with more information.
If you are worried you are coming in late, just give it some time.
Many said the same thing about buying $TRDX at .0016...
Look at the chart.
TRDX was chilling at .0016 a few months ago when i gave it my first smack.
Oh no, you misread my comment.
Look at the volume action on 11/19. Roughly 91M shares were traded that day. As this was chart bottom, i wager a third of those shares were flipped. So the 2/3 number is of the total volume traded on that day. This is my estimate of the float. At the most, we likely have 100M. Best case scenario would be 60M.
In addition, try to pull out the historic chart. Look for the largest volume candle. You will find 20-30M shares.
The 'freely' trading float is much much smaller than the OS leads us to believe.
Also note chart. approx 78M sent it from .0003 to .0012. Indicating that it is a very light float. By my estimation, the float was turned around the day filings were dropped. So it is likely no more than 2/3 of that value.
L2. And momentum: How many shares does it take to move the chains north. While the OS is massive, it trades thin. I suspect a lot of those shares are not in play. Either restricted or held by previous owner or worth much more to the holder than .001..
Not that many.
Foolish ones, yes. Key is getting the shares out of their hands here.
"We shall see, said the blind man."
(this is just a figure of speech and not meant as an insult or anything).
path to 5c is never a straight line.
Here's what google search on that new address turned out:
https://www.linkedin.com/company/advaion-llc/about/
Thoughts?
RMs, if you know how to play them, never involve a loss of capital. Just patience. If you are buying based on news, you are probably losing money.
Look at CERPQ chart. First week of April. That's when you should have bought. In fact, any buy under .01 has never been OTM since the run started. ... EOM.