Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
I believe it is indeterminate if the SEPARATE licensing agreement is a PAID licensing agreement or not. It is possible that there is a licensing agreement in place that does not have a monetary value associated with it besides the SEPARATE lump sum payment. Or maybe it does.
!WRONG! There are indeed ongoing royalties from MSFT settlement.
However they are paid in the form of CREDS, JUICE, CHUTZPAH, CARTE BLANCHE.
These ongoing royalties facilitate SFOR to take on the REST OF THE WORLD that are infringing on SFOR patents.
I WOULD VENTURE TO SAY KAY TOOK THIS INTO ACCOUNT UPON AGREEING TO A LIMP SUM CASH PAYMENT.
dont look a gift horse in the mouth
We've been fortunate enough to find this company with potential energy currently being converted to kinetic energy.
If you want a stock in the kinetic energy phase there is always AMZN AAPLE GOOG etc.
Count your blessings that for whatever reason SFOR has had a tough road of it and is finally kicking into gear.
Yours is not to question why. Yours is but to do or DIE.
Thanks and why the 30% drop Friday?
dat chart da bomb
Thanks, but your post is non-responsive to my questions.
I don't get what you are saying at all.
Ouch. Looks like a bad day for DBMM today.
What happened? Sorry, I'm totally new to this stock.
Not bashing, thinking of getting in.
Also, what is this all about?
DBMM is NOT current in their filings on the OTCQB exchange and has a YIELD sign
And what does the sticky mean that DBMM has to turn over all their stock to the sheriff?
When Blinkee.com, LLC was sued by Litecubes, LLC,Gauntlett Assoc. (the law firm in your link) was our representation.
Hey is that Snowden on that laptop on this page?
COMCAST YES!! THIS ROOLZ!!
$1.00 easy
yeah, complete effing coincidence
SPECULATION
is going to keep building here!
So much going on that this will continue to rise on
CONJECTURE
I BET KAY WON'T DO A GODFORSAKEN PPS KILLING VIDEO AGAIN!
Operative word: little
Little group of friends
Past runs were pure speculation.
Current run is partly speculation, but based on MUCH more evidence.
-An actual SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE has occurred.
-SFOR #1 seller on Amazon (for a time)
-SFOR's ACS Deals with INTEL and others (refer to ZPaul and other's DD)
-Debt reduction.
-New infringers to be announced.
Etc.
Point is that some little group of friends won't tank SFOR this time, especially if one of the many catalysts materializes any time soon!
.016!!! Hey Claytrader, let's see your video for this one today!
SFOR gets gross or net?
If this is a pump by some group like when this went to .024 then clue the rest of us in when it is time to dump this time.
Not selling as much as I thought.
Convinced wife today not to sell half our holdings at .02!!!
Super excited that I get to go for this ride!
It is apparent what is happening here. All the catalysts coming together at once.
Killer volume today.
Yes it did, but even if SFOR had been completely solvent at the time, it would have been a good strategy to accept a nominal settlement just to establish this precedent (precedent in real life terms, but not by legal definition.) They now have a road map for cash from other infringers. This is evident by the fact that DUO is using the same lawyers that MSFT used. ROADMAP!
I'm telling you:
If I had a product
And the whole world was infringing on my patent,
and I had a chance for a settlement against
THE LARGEST COMPANY IN THE WORLD (or in the top five)
I wouldn't be particularly greedy in getting the settlement.
I would consider the settlement itself incredibly valuable as a model for settlements
AGAINST THE REST OF THE WORLD.
Ten million
Zen Shmillion
Perhaps at that point SFOR would offer a sort of amnesty in exchange for favorable licensing terms.
I wasn't talking about small gains. You did not understand my post.
The point is in order for large gains to occur incremental small gains are necessary.
YOU SHOULD CARE about daily price even if you're long. After all the price has to get to .01 before it can get to .02 let alone .10
Once Again!! THE MICROSOFT PRECEDENT IS VIRTUALLY PRICELESS.
MSFT PRECEDENT was worth so much SFOR could have settled for even less that 10m and still have come out far ahead.
!!!WOW!!! You could make thousands of dollars or something. Beavis
Reminds me of OJ case and other cases that I seem to recollect where defense attorney moves to dismiss the case as their first action. No chance of it happening but they do it all the time for some reason. It's like some kind of hell Mary.
Last I read the name was changed form "Intel Security" to "MacAfee" and 51% was sold to a private equity group of which the name currently escapes me.
Oh yeah here it is:
https://www.wsj.com/articles/intel-nears-deal-to-sell-mcafee-security-unit-to-tpg-1473277803
Thanks for the post Z!
In your post you point out that the document you link to has:
MFA/SFA/2FA/Authentications
"All over it."
We all get the implication that SFOR must somehow be connected at least tangentially if nothing else because of their patents related to this technology.
I truly hope this assumption is correct.
I'm afraid it may be missing something however.
For example, are there other patents by other entities that supercede or conflict with SFOR?
Is MFA/SFA/2FA/Authentications truly so widespread now that it has entered public domain as another poster on ihub suggested?
The contigency representation by Blank Rome alleviates my concerns somewhat. They are apparently very confident of SFOR mandate in these matters.
Let's also keep in mind that there was an extrinsic value to the settlement with Microsoft and that it sets the precedent for future cases. So it was worthwhile to accept a lower dollar amount for that reason alone.
Kay lied on your face in his conference room?
DUO link. Has this been posted yet? I clicked through to this on an add that was on my skype:
https://duo.com/trial?utm_source=quantcast&utm_campaign=easier-pilot&utm_medium=cpc&key=Quant3B
Loving this strong move on relatively high volume!
Sevens are back baby!!
I totally would.
Would love to lower my basis.
But wife won't let me :(
I bought some behind her back a couple months ago.
Suffered the consequences. (ON COUCH FOR A MONTH)
Thank you. I stand corrected.
Technically, I don't believe there is any such thing as a "Settlement Conference."
It is referred to as an "Early Neutral Evaluation"
Check it - http://www.cand.uscourts.gov/ene
Interesting style of posts
Many of you have
Like haiku or something
poetic?
dig!
Don't forget.
SETTLEMENTS IMMINENT
SFOR gonna rock!!
This is the fourth day at this price level. your may be right, but when this jumped a month or so ago, it dove almost as fast.
I am heartened that there has been a bit of stability and this move is not as fleeting as last time.
Sure 4 days isn't very much time. We will just have to wait and see. Guess I am an optimist.
Very happy with today's price action. This is holding up well at this level. Looks like we are establishing .007 as base. Slow gains moving forward until news hits and then:
!BOOM!
Conjecture will only get you so far.
Is everyone trying to figure this out for some reason?
The only reason I can think of is if you want to sell soon.
I'm longer than that so I can wait to see how things play out in court.
Soon we will know and won't have to guess.
Odds overwhelmingly favor settlement.
Won't be long now.