Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Is Eijah / Demonsaw still involves with this?
LOL she’d be nervous if she even knew I was spending much time on ihub
She’s a piece if work but I’m not totally totally whipped
While I agree with your conclusion and the substance of your post I take exception to your choice of words just for the hell of it.
The fact that this occurred October 5 makes me more bullish on secure auth settlement having gone through since the recent document referenced that October 2 dismissal request by secure auth.
no look at the bottom
APPL over 5 Billion shares OS
https://ycharts.com/companies/AAPL/shares_outstanding
CEO Mark Kay indicated that if SFOR stays above .015 for awhile he would uplift to OTCBB.
I saw the referenced email on ihub awhile back but don’t have it at my disposal.
my Point is merely philosophical
OMG people read and comprehend my posts.
I’m not skeptical at all.
I believe settlements are imminent. Any day.
I BELIEVE SETTLEMENTS ARE IMMINENT ANY DAY NOW.
However I’m a proponent of “keeping it real”
I’m a firm believer in SFOR IP and I feel strongly that th IPR REJECTION and ENTRUST SETTLEMENT have put SFOR in a very strong position.
However.
I just caution people to discern facts and certainties from conclusions and conjecture.
There is a difference no matter how bullish one is on SFOR.
It’s actually better for the newbies to post with realism so they are not let down if the people’s assertions don’t pan out.
Thanks, you too.
Yeah I had some serious family problems at that time and since then I have had to discontinue trading altogether because of gambling addiction issues.
I’m not ashamed, but regretful because trading is fun and I’d buy at least a couple million more SFOR shares AT THIS PRICE if wife would go along.
Lol. Wife won’t let me buy more.
Anyway I don’t try to lie or badmouth to “get cheap shares”
I’m just interested in facts.
I’m not even badmouthing or naysaying.
I feel the future is bright.
Remember tho that false expectations can lead to disappointment.
Just keep it real.
Infringers will PROBABLY settle any day now.
But no one can tell me it is for certain without proof.
Last time we were around this price level around two cents some people several people said we will never see sub Pennie again how did that work out?
Might be best not to speak in absolute terms.
Although at this point I really doubt will see some Penny again ever
However I won’t say never never say never say never say never say
Nope still holding long and strong but there’s a difference between Belief and a certainty so I’m just pointing that out
I don’t doubt it which is why I have 600,000 shares but I wouldn’t go so far as to say it’s a certainty and those that do should prove it
Please prove that victory is certain for sfor in a court case
Please link DD showing no possibility of win
Agreed, but they could be one of those "dead-enders" in Irag that Rumsfeld used to talk about. They are facing these options:
A. Settle for millions
B. Fight and maybe win.
C. Fight and lose BIG.
They might try it, butI feel they will settle, especially since 98% of cases like this settle.
Since DUO et. al. opted for IPR it stands to reason they may not capitulate and may choose to go for Jury trial.
maybe nasdaq, but maybe otcbb sooner than that
The fact that WSJ picked up this wire shows that those in high positions of power recognize what a very big deal this is.
sticky worthy post! nice!
Wait just a GD Minute!
All four settling? Officially?
I agree with Penny. It will either go down or up. Oh wait or maybe it's going to stay the same.
Not gonna drop
20-30% gain tomorrow easily.
UPDATE: Still not "tested"
So far we are 2-0 in court cases, having sued and settled with 2 major infringers and we are still completely untested.
Come to think of it, Chocolate Ice Cream has still yet to be proven to be delicious.
Why doesn't AAPL Or GOOG use this technique to channel money into a private?
Wouldn't it benefit them to do so?
Or did SFI invent this technique?
IMO rumors on ihub not going to matter to PPS very much very soon once this news is spread to the "wider community"
This conspiracy theory needs to be debunked.
I have yet to see a case where a public company funnels money into a private company to avoid paying shareholders and enrich themselves.
Can anyone show an example of this or help to dispel this notion?
No Dr. that isn't necessarily true.
Only if the suit had merit.
Sorry maybe it wasn't a tweet but another poster attributed that phrase to Kay yesterday
Good luck with that theory.
Since you are so sure why don't you pay me $100 for each $mil SFOR receives in the settlement.
Also Kay tweeted that SFOR "did well"
Not likely.
What you've described would be a fairly simple arrangement.
The docket states that the settlement is more complicated than usual.
Wow thanks CHEDS.
Wow the legendary CHEDS stopped by.
It would be a whole lot more impressive if he came by BEFORE the 78% move than after.
Anybody could predict the 78% might correct down some.
Way to go out on a limb CHEDS.
Damnit they want to increase common stock from 75m to 200m shares.
Am I mistaken or does the latest proxy statement call for heavy dilution?
That's awesome still works.