Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
This Ihub board has been told it can be anywhere from under 24 hours (rule 36 beat down) to a few months from the orals.
Total guessing game
Are you a shareholder or the board contrarian? Anything you do like about AMRN?
So using your logic, only the insider’s shares that they acquire and hold going forward are going to be worth anything at a later date? Any retail investor who owns shares won’t have any equity in their shares? Is that what you’re fear mongering about today?
Date of patent issued: 2/27/24
Thank you for the post MA52TA
The 1A wins several years ago ultimately turned out to be worthless hubris for AMRN. I’m sure everyone here would trade those hollow victories for anything court related post 2018.
Countless millions of dollars spent on defending this one drug company.
For CAFC not to remand back to District Court would be insulting and inexcusable.
To have gotten Dyk and Reyna twice is statistically a problem and just reeked of a judicial hatchet job,as evidenced by what eventually happened.
Thank you Skipperdog…Oral arguments on 4/2/24 @ 10:00 am for Hikma case. Not able to be delayed/rescheduled so it’s happening. 15 minutes for each side.
Saw steven1x post on Stocktwits about this
I will not nuke that premonition of yours. I am all for it, and then some. We need a new digit in front of the decimal point re: pps.
Commercial would cost the same amount (approx. $7M) as to what the previous jackals spent to defend against Sarissa proxy last year.
Given the choice, I’d take the 30 sec. random plug to let the world know about V. It’s not happening this evening on our screens, but an easy cost comparison to make.
Throw in some condescending comments and after the facts know it all approach and he’ll receive “the hate” comments year after year. He outwore his ability to connect with readers years ago.
JR, you really do like to play Switzerland on these message boards and, well, the reply comments you get are self explanatory.
Rose, great question. That would be a good discussion topic for Holt to answer at any time…I wouldn’t mind tomorrow morning
DAR, let’s clear some things up.
The stock had been in the 20’s for awhile before they shockingly announced a 22.2M share cash grab at $18. GS could have probably done this $2-5 higher but they and AMRN settled on $18 a share for a $400M bump in rainy day cash. It’s kept the company alive. Screw GS
Oh, so glad you’d be happy for it to “stay above 1 and climb on good news.”
Do you honestly think that Holt, or Denner, or anyone with a brain at AMRN is going to sign off on a R/S? Such an idiotic comment to post, but not surprising from some of your previous gems.
To Dusty and any other recent newcomer: Read months of previous posts and make sure your BS filter is clean and operational. It’s a steady study as to what’s going on and who is legit vs. misleading. Not sure about how many gp doctors on this site: Optometrist (1)…..
I have no idea why this would all take 2 more years to make it happen? That’s an eternity in Amarin time
What do you care, you don’t even own shares
Remind us all why you post here?
Were you two boobs in a scotch ad together
No drunk, just a Muppet in the balcony calling out repeats. I tried to beat you to your schtick with the inane math conversions and $5 break even crap. It was getting old, just like all of us long timers here. Feel free to pull out at $5 if you choose. No one cares about one’s unverified cost averages or sharecounts, for that matter.
Oh, allow me. “ if we close like this 17 more times in a row we will get to my $5 price where I will sell all prematurely and then bitch when it goes higher and is taken over” -Main
DAR, you nailed it.
His approach is Eyeore style. Thumb out the first thought (with no filter of Trust but verify), spoon feed other naysayers on the boards and then end a post with “I hope I’m wrong”
You are an unsolicited wet blanket on these boards
It’s always nice to wake up to good AMRN Saturday morning news… regarding Vascepa Medicare coverage the weekly prescription numbers are really going to important and sorely missed/needed.
Nothing has been confirmed, verified or validated from yours or NS prematurely posting a week ago. What part of waiting for clinical trial.gov don’t you understand?
Your hubris is beyond comprehension.
What an egotistical post you’ve made. Take your stick and ball and get lost. Your “efforts” have led to nothing more than conjecture. Bye bye
JR71 sure does like attention. Credibility is of no concern. Very questionable motives continue to be seen on the message boards. Poor form
Ok, I’ll play along northern neighbor. What if I read a Christmas Eve post from a seasoned scribe who tossed out thoughts and possibilities with loose ends, make that dead ends, then asked us all to go on a (I’m borrowing this from another Ihuber) scavenger hunt and look for something that’s not available?
Should I question the random timing of this alleged event taking place (apparently months ago) or blindly believe an anonymous person who has an anonymous source who couldn’t really verify the information of the event to report back to the source so the anonymous source could then report back to us following the events that make up the story board that we are following.
The characters on a message board now include a self anointed evil villain. Daily entertainment value on the streaming Ihub channel
So nothing reported on clinical trials.gov, nothing posted anywhere by U. Wisconsin or Cynthia Carlsson or anywhere else on the web and a few here are sucking up to NS and his pouty attitude and veiled threat of no info when he may learn something new? Plenty of posters like dogn and Evila and monk, etc. who share meaningful data.
“you people are unbelievable” …that’s your typical response when you don’t agree with dissent. Sleven’s post was the very definition of FUD (fear uncertainty doubt) and a few other choice words (f’en useless data) and to no surprise you are quick to dismiss any critique. Just because most here don't post every thought that comes to mind on a very consistent basis, like you big shareholder, doesn’t mean we don’t analyze what’s being presented to us. Your condescending attitude is rich at times.
You think people are stupid enough to think they should unwittingly track down a ghost based on your Christmas Eve post by trying to shame them?
Now people are vanishing from the board? Your credibility is wilting by the hour.
You just did a 180 on this board in 48 hours and it’s so easy to see now. Pathetic
Nicely said. Totally unnecessary for him to spew that crap Christmas Eve with a word salad of “heard it from a source” His follow up today is just as cryptic as 2 days ago. His only disclaimer was that it may not be officially presented and that he’d try to reach out again to the team involved in the trial. We’ve been told that clinical trials.gov will post results when ready and that’s most likely in the new year.
As each week passes, we all become more skeptical and cynical until we don’t have to be anymore.
I don’t care how “long” someone is or how much they post or what they post. This is still an anonymous board and no one is vetted and verified.
Agreed…this whole chatter starts on 12/24 and we went all of October, November and most of December and we’re discussing top line results potentially having been released 2 months ago and we ride the IBB wave up last week?
Zero posts about it on ‘twits?…and there are some piranhas on that board, as well as Ihub. Not really sure what Sleven is implying with no real evidence..the links are ambiguous at best
It was posted here or on Twits that on 12/12 the trial study was designated “completed” in clinical trials.gov
I’m very skeptical that results have failed and were presented at a conference that we didn’t know about? Nothing official out from Dr. Carlson either and allegedly the results are made known at some rando conference before it’s stamped “completed”. C’mon people
Sleven, I sincerely hope you’re not delivering “coal”news today on Christmas Eve with your BRAVE prognosis.
The trolls lurking about, however, are desperately hoping your hunch is correct.
I just want the extra year of the trial extension to mean something beneficial. We will all find out soon enough what is to be of the seemingly umpteenth catalyst for this drug.
Seve, if you sold post horrendous 3/30/20 decision @$4 then you missed the run up to over $9 in Feb. ‘21.
You don’t know as much about this stock’s history as you think
If you sold @$4 after the horrendous decision you missed a run up to over $9 in Feb’21.
You don’t know as much about this stock history as you think
Two more years of mercurial posts from people here? Nope, I’ll take the under.
The low print was .65
You speak in semantics and word salads. And this, again, from some dude who doesn’t even own the stock. You’ve got your agenda so keep doing you
“Almost afraid to mention it”, yet here you are trolling. Do you think Sarissa increased their sharecount only to see it decrease “in the near future”?
Troll on