You are high all day long? Is there a medical reason for this or is it by choice?

Do you not like being sober?

Agreed. But are you willing to allow people to drive while high on the notion that it affects people differently?


If your son/daughter wanted to get in a vehicle with his friend who was high, would you allow it? Even though the driver swore up and down his clarity was enhanced while under the influence?

For argument sake, let's say the driver is 20 years old.

IMO all who replied to you were quite diplomatic with you. If ever I made a comment like "pot doesn't impair people" I'd be crucified by my peers.

And I would deserve it.

The problem I see here is that you feel you are being descriptive, artistic and coherent in your posts.

But you are not in my opinion.

How you perceive you are coming across is not how we read your posts.

I believe that's always been the issue with being high. A false sense of reality.

I think you just proved his point.

Brilliant post. It had to be said

I can see where Justin got his intelligence from...

"All evidence shows that children under the age of 18 should not smoke marijuana. It's very bad for the development of their brain. After 18, go ahead!"

So stupid.

Where's my evidence? Ummm I think it's obvious when looking at the fact that we are no closer to legalization than we were when Harper was in.

Trudeau can give no timeline or information about it.

Trudeau used this issue to rope in young voters, winning majority... But he had no plan and still has no plan.

People are still serving time for minor pot offenses.

Besides activists, nobody is calling him out on his lack of mj reform.

I agree. I am also betting on legalization. That's why I invested in this company.

UM..jubbala...

This is on the venture exchange, only slightly better than the OTC if any.

You're acting as if CGC is a blue chip pubco.

It can drop just as easy as it can rise and without legalization this stock is worth less than a dime.

Btw, weak hands selling can absolutely ensue mob mentality. Thus, destroying the sp

Why are you comparing Amazon with CGC?

Amazon scaled up appropriately to the market and had quality executives that knew how to run a pubco

CGC continues to build with no way of selling product unless legalization occurs.

CGC will do great when legalization comes, until then they will dilute. I hope we don't see a roll back before that day

What do you think is brewing?

The last 10Q really scare me...

You said he's been gone for six months, wouldn't it mean he's been doing "illegal activity" for the past three years?!? Just a thought...

Wow! Quite the personal attack...

No offense, but if it is the same Balbir, Brentkosta is right, the SEC should be investigating...

Why are you so angry Philly?!?

He was there last month when I called... But the article I found says he's been banned since 2013!!!
When did he stop working for MDRM?!?
It's the same guy???

How do you know he's not working there anymore?!

I've been doing some google searches of "MDRM" and "Balbir"

I found a lot of legal documents from securities fraud!!!

https://www.osc.gov.on.ca/documents/en/Proceedings-RAD/rad_20130403_mbs2.pdf

Is this the same guy...?

What do you mean by facilitator?

Who is that guy???

Is he a new director?

Same number from the 10Q.

I tried calling about a month ago and a guy named Babire picked up the phone. He couldn't give me any information. I am still frustrated.

FINALLY!!!

If HC is anticipating anything I think it is the recreational market.

I don't see them slowing down applications for that reason alone

I'm sure the Feds are urging HC to have enough supply for the inevitable demand.

To me, that makes more sense than slowing down due to a few home growers that won't even be allowed to sell their product.

Here is one link

https://research.dundeecapitalmarkets.com/~/media/Dcm/Publications/CoverageListResearch/2016/February/M/MMJ022516.pdf?dmc=1&ts=20160225T0818583581

You must have just bought in to have a positive attitude like that... We all know dksc is garbage.

What can he lose is the better question?

The amount of shares donated to directors of this company is criminal. It'll be interesting to see what the SEC says about a $350k website that doesn't actually exist.

There are a few people involved with the company who stand to make a lot of money here. Lucky for them they've had to invest nothing.

They can't even complete a simple name change. If that doesn't spell incompetence what does? What happened to Fontus and the website? This company has done absolutely nothing in the past year...