Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
From another post by you on iHub, looks like you’re going after this guy in court. How’s this related to this ticker? Link?
Did they ever respond to your email?
Just enough communication to sell new shares, that's all that's needed. No advertisement, no sales, right?
From OTCMarkets, their phone/email (Malaysia):
+60 43904094
dcxcapital@dynagroup.com.my
What an announcement!
Totally, once the new company took this shell, it killed speculation since NFTs/tokens and other web3.0 buzz has faded.
"I am not advising anyone on what to do with their money"
Yes, you are:
"Those who have higher avgs, now is the time to avg down"
Which is fine - totally entitled to your opinion...IMO I just don't think it's prudent. I sold at a loss a while ago, so I'm out. My position was negative, I felt that was the best move. If I saw volume buying accompanied by increasing price, then I might think "now is the time to buy". As you noted, YMMV.
I know everyone has different trading styles...but you're advising bagholders to throw more money into a negative position.
What are the underlying factors pushing this to sub-trips? Certainly not good or exciting things...
This ticker performed significantly better with more uncertainty
10X monthly average volume
I think DBE tweets brought in more buyers who may have not have been willing to play the waiting game. Some will bail.
Correct, if an 8K were required, the would have had 4 days to comply.
I don't think so, 8K is for unscheduled material events. I know there are the 14A requirements for announcing the Proxy vote...but not sure on post-vote reporting requirements.
- Induce others to buy
- Induce others to sell
- Mental masturbation
- Vent frustration on lost $$$
HUNTINGTON BEACH, CA, March 14, 2022 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- via NewMediaWire -- One World Universe Inc. (OTC: OWUV), a publicly traded company that invests in sports related businesses, distressed assets, business opportunities within emerging industries such as the Metaverse, and providing humanitarian efforts in over 185 countries, has recently ended business ties with the former Investor Relations Director, Dana Salzarulo.
One World Universe Inc. appreciates the work that Dana gave to OWUV throughout his tenure, but after careful review, One World Universe felt it was necessary to have a clean start. While OWUV executives sort through resumes and decide on the new Investor Relations Director, Social Media Director, Richard Quiroz, will take over writing press releases and reviewing questions, comments, and concerns through the email info@jcholdingcorp.com.
“One World Universe Inc. looks forward to receiving resumes from professional Investor Relations personnel over the next couple of weeks. This company thrives on dedication and buy-in from our employees. Any loss of this dedication or belief by any of our employees makes the entire mission susceptible to failure and compromises the values of our organization and degrades the shareholder value we strive to maintain. I look forward to personally reviewing resumes and talking with those we interview.” – Jerry C. Craig, One World Universe Inc. CEO
Lame PR…Why not simply announce a new IR person? Instead they provide too much internal discussion which just raises more questions…why did their former IR person lose dedication and belief?
I'm curious why Decathlon dropped it.
Why would the decathlon case be a dark cloud? Adverse weather doesn't matter when there's nothing happening on the ground beneath...unless there's a hidden gem to be monetized in this mess. Even if there was, why would this crew consider any responsibilities to SPCL bagholders?
I don't see any evidence to indicate anything other than a silent ending with all players moving on to other things. Would be pleasantly surprised otherwise!
What are you talking about?
What direction is that?
I have no insight into reinstatement, or any other developments that would somehow help bagholders. Not sure where anyone else is getting such info....or is it just positive, wishful thinking that's happening :)
Case Status (18CV328662):
Case Type: Breach of Contract/Warranty Unlimited (06)
Case Number: 18CV328662
Filing Date: 5/21/2018
Case Status: Closed/Inactive
Court Location: Civil
Events (18CV328662):
2/22/2022 Request: Dismissal Decathlon Alpha II, L.P., Decathlon Alpha II, L.P., Request for Dismissal (Dismissals)
So...Decathlon requested the case dismissal and it's closed.
Is mgmt buying at these levels?
Absolutely! Makes it all the more important to be clear on what Eric is claiming and then delivering. So when someone says an acquisition date is set, it's important to dig in to see whether that's accurate.
Good distinction Satter - thanks. It's a date for a date that's been set not the acquisition date itself.
Got it, the date is not publicly announced. It's claimed the date is set. Thought I missed something.
I missed that! What is the tech acquisition date? Thanks!
Case Number: 18CV328662
https://portal.scscourt.org
(3) Letters were sent out to the case attorneys on 10/20/2021 requesting their appearance in San Jose on 3/3/2022 for a hearing on:
- Case Status Review
- Status of Default/Judgement Package
Even if Decathlon prevails, what are some positive outcomes for the rest of us...other than some brief schadenfreude for the Pixel crew? I'm not sure what you're keeping faith on...it's not like this thing is going to be re-formed, re-listed and go to the moon. What do you see as the potential positive outcomes?
Wow - nice surprise!
Nonsense. China is completely destroyed...lol.
https://www.aap.com.au/dam-lies-three-gorges-flood-claim-holds-no-water-at-all/
Correct, same thing with Etrade
Where did you get that information? Are you speaking specifically - like overnight tonight (4/20)...or more generally, like one night it will go current :)
Decathlon Alpha II, L.P. et al vs Pixel Mags, Inc. et al 18CV328662
Conference: Trial Setting
Department 7 Donna M. O'Hara
Date 0f Hearing:
04/06/2021
Heard By:
Courtroom Reporter:
Parties Present:
Rudy, Christopher G
Carlson, Thomas Hanson Exhibits:
Justin Wilmers is present for the defense Counsel are present via court call
Set 0n 11/1/21 at 8:45 AM for Court Trial Time estimate: 5 days
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA
Trial Counsel: for Plaintiff — Carlson, for Defendant — Walters
Settlement Conference 0n 10/27/2021 at 9:00 am in Department 07.
Just my post on the "date-for-a-date" below.
What are you patiently waiting for? What sort of phoenix-rising scenario are you envisioning :)
lol - didn't see that 1 share at the bid
? Not following - shadenfreude?
Oof...that's too chill.
Current for 2 years and now on ice - bummer. Hope to see Mr. Chiang address this soon.
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA
MINUTE ORDER
Decathlon Alpha II, L.P. vs PixelMags, Inc. et al
18CV328662
Hearing Start Time: 10:00AM
HearingType: Review:Case Status
Date 0f Hearing: 11/12/2020
Comments:
Heard By: McGowen,Beth
Location: Department 8
Courtroom Reporter: - No Court Reporter
Courtroom Clerk: Mark Rosales
Parties Present: Carlson,Thomas Hanson Attorney
Court Interpreter:
CourtInvestigator:
FutureHearings:
Exhibits:
Brian Walters for Defendant.
Both counsel by Court call.
Set for trial setting on 4/6/21 at 11:00a.m. in Department 8.