Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Personas Provides Update on Keek Marketing Launch
V.PRSN | 32 minutes ago
Toronto, Ontario--(Newsfile Corp. - September 14, 2023) - Personas Social Incorporated (TSXV: PRSN) (the "Company") announces the launch of its Keek marketing initiatives.
The Company is proud to announce that it has completed the pre-launch phase of its Keek re-launch and will start marketing the service to users on September 15th, 2023.
The initial marketing campaign will be a Khloe Kardashian Giveaway contest of which the Company is a sponsor. The Giveaway contest will offer Khloe Kardashian Instagram followers a chance to win cash or prizes for following her sponsors' social media pages. This contest will be run back-to-back with a Keek contest that will offer users a chance to win a prize from the $30,000 prize pool being offered by the Company. To qualify for a chance to win, users must download the Keek app and follow Khloe Kardashian's profile on Keek. A random draw will take place on October 1st at the Company's offices in Toronto, Canada.
The Keek-sponsored contest will be advertised to the Company's approximately 1.5 million social media users, and to all users participating in the Khloe Kardashian Giveaway contest. This marketing imitative is the first of many that will happen regularly over the next several months.
For further information, please contact:
Personas Social Incorporated
Mark Itwaru
Chairman & Chief Executive Officer
647.789.0074
Mark Itwaru mark@personas.com
PRSN is going to take off with this app. Look at that app in the App Store KEEK SOCIAL
KEEKS aid now live this app is absolutely insane. This is a top notch app in the social media space.
Stock has almost tripled and still rising. Be prepared for the launch
The stock has doubled….. and that’s nothing compares to what is coming ??
Reinstated trading as of Feb.14 for Personas Social. This is not dead that just got a reboot. Be aware big money to be made.
Valuation metrics for peeks Social is way below value. Revaluation is starting to take place. Also looks like lots of news is starting to pour out from the company.
I think the next thing that can make this move really hard and fast is the merger between Persona and Peeks Social. Hopefully we hear about that in the next few days.
Looks like re-evaluation in the making. We may have seen the bottom put in. Reversal looks to be under way. With many more great things to happen next week and along in Oct.
Looks like either a financing is going through or some type of transaction.
Easy Chris perry is paid by SL to promote SL. Read the disclosures at the end of the article. Just like a time Chris perry said "health canada is dying to inspect SL facility". That was a load of crap back in NOV. 2014. Every pick he made turned out awful. OGI he was in at 80cents hype up OGI and sold for a big loss and it goes on and on.
Too bad the closing price will be in the teens and not the 20 cent range. Hence a drop in share price will ensue. There is a reason why they never mentioned the PP price. SL is always oversubscribed.
The future is batteries, I think that's why more and more bigger companies realize that and what to get into the game. All those batteries will need significant graphite.
In the coming weeks the market cap will have to increase dramatically to bring full value to the project. Due to mine development, financing, off take agreements, and or partnerships.
Only things to come with ENERGIZER'S OFF TAKE agreement. Everything is lining up. This is the year for energizer and the graphite resource stocks. Exciting times ahead!!
15 cents this has been a very bad stock to be invested in year over year. So the stock would be at 3 cents if there was no 5:1 reverse rollback split. Brutal. No wonder David the CEO has left, he's a smart guy.
Good to see the volume has picked up yesterday. Graphite is going to be the resource this year. This will be energizer's year to shine. Only things to come.
If they got an agreement with no BFS or testing at the site. It's time for ENZR to show the market that all sampling from over 20 companies really had interest in the high grade product which Energizer has. They keep saying off-takes agreement and partners. But its time to show and sign deals. If it does not occur in a few months from the BFS, there is a serious problem.
Time for energizer to show us some results. The BFS was stellar. Now it's time to close off takes and partnership agreements. They have to close agreements in the coming months. That will show the market and others that the BFS was so great that companies see the potential for energizer and that they want the graphite product which energizer has. And for Brent to says this is the year for energizer resources. Big statement he made better be backed up.
Oh so over a year has passed no licence, ceo left, Fac 1 denied. What the matter Sl "health canada was impatiently waiting for Sl" to finish the project, which they have. But still no inspection. Wonder why???
Sad to see over one year has passed and NO stock appreciation. The stock has decreased instead. David left for a reason. SL has issues and they are not minor ones.
It's all apart of the bigger plan to get energizer producing graphite in 2017. To get a company producing anything it takes a coordinated effort from raising money to negotiating deals. Deals which CAT had expressed great interest in one providing the equipment to energizer and also a possible financing from CAT financial division. Not to mention others from potential off takes.
Well it's not a good track record to have with health canada. Being denied fac1. Obviously other companies that have not been rejected will have a better chance at actually getting a licence compared to SL.
Well silly did you not say this was going to $2 in your dreams. Keep dreaming. Still no licence and still no inspection date I wonder why???
It's only the truth and facts....And your a sorry pumper in the dumps.
How if they have no inspection date yet???? And with their Fac 1 denied. Does not look good for SL
Watch the drop today.... No inspection yet to be scheduled. SL has nothing just a greenhouse and having facility 1 denied by health canada to grow Medical marihuana
Not likely the down turn will continue. Those who have not locked in profits yet, you better not wait any longer before it hits the 20s or lower. Remember where the run started from. Significantly lower.
Sorry to bust your bubble but ENZR is not doing a share roll back anytime soon =, I had contacted management. They see none in the foreseeable future.
Huge volume today even more than the day the BFS was out. Someone is definitely accumulating. After the BFS that is a good sign. They dive into the BFS and saw the goods are there. Expect a deal shortly with CAT and or DRA. CATO in 2013 signed s letter of intent to fund the MOLO project once due diligence was performed. And WELL DIE DILIGENCE PERIOD IS OVER.
WORD IS GETTING OUT ABOUT ENERGIZER...MORE TO COME.
http://www.miningweekly.com/article/energizer-resources-reports-realistic-economics-for-madagascar-project-2015-02-06
Energizer Resources reports 'realistic' economics for Madagascar project
6TH FEBRUARY 2015 BY: HENRY LAZENBY
EMAIL THIS ARTICLE © REUSE THIS
Photo by Energizer Resources
Molo graphite project, Madagascar
TORONTO (miningweekly.com) – The positive results of a feasibility study (FS) on project developer Energizer Resources’ Molo graphite project, in Madagascar, have confirmed that the project will be economically viable using a mine design that is both conservative and realistic.
TSX-listed Energizer said on Thursday that the FS had placed an after-tax net present value, when applying a 10% discount rate, of $389.8-million on its 100%-owned project, while the internal rate of return was calculated at 31.2%.
“Completion of the feasibility study is a significant milestone along the development path of our Molo graphite project. It indicates [that] the project has attractive economics and that we have one of the lowest operating costs in the industry.
“Our graphite deposit is large enough to realise a very long mine life and the plant is scalable so we can quickly ramp up production, if so required. The plant will be able to produce a high-quality graphite concentrate, which can supply the entire spectrum of end-uses for natural graphite, including the foil and electric vehicle battery markets,” CEO Richard Schler advised.
The global graphite market was heating up in the wake of increased technological applications for the carbon allotrope, including US automobile maker Tesla’s construction of its upcoming GigaFactory battery plant, in Nevada, which was expected to double world graphite demand by 2022.
Prepared by independent consulting engineering firm DRA Projects, the FS considered a mine that would produce an average of 856 701 t/y of ore, which would be processed to produce an average of about 53 017 t/y of graphite concentrate starting in 2017, over the 26 year life-of-mine (LoM).
The study also assumed that the $188.2-million mine would be funded on a 50% debt and 50% equity basis. Steady-state costs were expected in the third operational year onwards, with the difference being in additional expatriates on site during the first two years.
The Molo project had National Instrument 43-101-compliant proven reserves of 14.17-million tonnes, grading 7% graphitic carbon, and 8.37-million tonnes, grading 7.04% carbon, in the probable reserve category.
The project had measured resources of 23.62-million tonnes, grading 6.32% carbon, and 76.75-million tonnes, grading 6.25%, in the indicated category.
The Molo project would include the construction of an openpit mine, a processing plant with a capacity of 862 000 t/y of ore and all supporting infrastructure including water, fuel, power, tailings, buildings and permanent accommodation.
The mine would use four 2 MW diesel generators, with three running and one on standby, and water would be supplied from a well field that had been defined by drilling and geohydrological modelling.
The processing plant would consist of conventional crushing, milling and flotation circuits followed by concentrate filtering, drying and screening. The waste-heat generated by the power station would be used to dry the concentrate.
The tailings storage facility, in the form of a valley dam layout, would be about 1.5 km to the west of the process plant and would be designed to accommodate the run-of-mine tonnage for the LoM
Good volume today...over 500,000 shares traded in 10 minutes. Great things to come.
EGZ.T / ENZR is the graphite stock to watch with there feasibility study out late last night.
Very impressive IR, mine life and purity, cost, and tonnage. Very high quality of graphit with XL flake size
HOT graphite stock to watch with there feasibility study out late last night. Energizer resources EGZ-t ENZR
Very impressive IR, mine life and purity, cost, and tonnage. Very high quality of graphit with XL flake size
Great feasibility study ....you guys wanted it and well Energizer provided IT. Look at that IR, cost came in under budget, well they have the graphite resource as it's shown in the tonnage and mine life.
Could be a takeout target shortly. Looks like they will have no problem closing the off take agreements with those numbers. Good time ahead.
Energizer Resources Inc. Announces Positive Results of Its Feasibility Study
T.EGZ | 13 hours ago
TORONTO, ONTARIO--(Marketwired - Feb. 5, 2015) - Energizer Resources Inc. (TSX:EGZ)(OTCQX:ENZR)(WKN:A1CXW3) ("Energizer" or the "Company") is pleased to report the results of its positive Feasibility Study ("FS") for its 100%-owned Molo graphite deposit in southern Madagascar. The FS was prepared by DRA Projects (Pty) Ltd. ("DRA") and is based on metallurgical test work conducted by SGS (Lakefield) Canada Metallurgical Services Inc. This test work included bench, pilot and variability tests. A National Instrument 43-101 technical report relating to the FS will be filed on SEDAR within 45 days of this news release.
FS Highlights
1. Post-tax: NPV (10% Discount Cash Flow)(1)(2) US$389,797,113
2. Post-tax: IRR(1)(2) 31.2%
3. Payback(2) 4.84 years
4. Capital cost ("CapEx") US$149.9 million
5. Design Development Allowance US$13.8 million
6. Contingency US$24.6 million
7. On-site Operating Costs ("OpEx") per tonne of concentrate, Year 3 onward) US$353
8. Transportation per tonne of concentrate (from Mine site to Madagascar Port Year 3 onward) US$182
9. Transportation per tonne of concentrate (from Madagascar Port to European Customer Port from Year 3 onward) US$155
10. Average annual production of concentrate 53,017 tonnes
11. Life of Mine ("LOM") 26 years
12. Graphite concentrate sale price (US$/tonne at Start Up - 2017) US$1,689 per tonne
13. Average Head Grade 7.04%
14. Average ore mined per annum 856,701 tonnes
15. Average stripping ratio 0.81:1
16. Average plant recovery 87.80%
Footnotes:
(1) Assumes project is financed with 50% debt and 50% equity.
(2) Values shown based on nominal cash flows, which include the effect of inflation. Costs are increased on an annual basis by the relevant inflation index.
"Completion of the feasibility study is a significant milestone along the development path of our Molo graphite project," stated Richard Schler, Chief Executive Officer of Energizer. "We have now confirmed that our project is economically viable with a planned mine design that we believe is both conservative and realistic. It indicates the project has attractive economics and that we have one of the lowest operating costs in the industry. Our graphite deposit is large enough to realize a very long mine life and the plant is scalable so we can quickly ramp up production if so required. The plant will be able to produce a high quality graphite concentrate, which can supply the entire spectrum of end uses for natural graphite including the foil and Electric Vehicle battery markets.
I would like to take this opportunity to thank everyone who has contributed to reaching this milestone including our shareholders who have waited patiently for the delivery of the study. The culmination of hard work and dedication over the past 4 years in some very difficult resource market conditions has enabled Energizer to validate an exceptional project that is positioned to serve an industry, which is expected to have significant demand growth over the next decade.
We believe this will be the stepping stone to help secure both off-take and project financing in the near future. We will now turn our entire focus towards delivering on these objectives over the coming months with a goal to be in production by 2017."
FS Overview:
The FS considers a mine that will produce an average of 856,701 tonnes per annum of ore, which is processed to produce an average of approximately 53,017 tonnes of graphite concentrate per annum (production commencing in 2017) over the 26 year life of mine ("LOM"). The FS assumes that the mine is funded on a 50% debt and 50% equity basis. 'Steady State' (or "Run Rate") costs are achieved in the third operational year onwards; the difference lies in additional expatriates on site in the first two years.
Financial results post tax*
Average price / tonne of concentrate (at start up, 2017) US$1,689
Internal Rate of Return ("IRR") - Project Equity 31.2%
NPV @ 8% Discounted Cash Flow US$521,602,408
NPV @ 10% Discounted Cash Flow US$389,797,113
NPV @ 12% Discounted Cash Flow US$293,649,899
Project Payback Period 4.84 years
*Assumes that the project is financed through 50% equity finance and 50% corporate debt. The debt assumptions used in the model assumes a rate of 5.75% over LIBOR, with LIBOR forecast to escalate to 3.54% by 2022. An arranging fee is also assumed.
Note that all values in the above table do not account for inflation and assume that a satisfactory investment agreement is negotiated under Madagascar's LGIM (Loi Sur les Grands Investissements Miniers) tax laws covering large scale mining investments, for which this project qualifies. Also included in the above table are forecasted prices for 2017, which coincides with the year the Molo mine is expected to be in production.
Mine & Process data
Proven reserves 14,170,000 tonnes @ 7.0% C grade
Probable reserves 8,367,000 tonnes @ 7.04% C grade
Grade (graphitic carbon) 7.04% average plant head feed over LOM
Waste to ore ratio 0.81:1
Processing rate 856,701 tonnes per annum
Mine life 26 years
Recovery 87.8%
Average annual product tonnes 53,017
Construction Capital Costs - CapEx
(expressed in US$ millions):
Capital Cost US$149.9
Design Development Allowance US$13.8
Contingency US$24.5
Total US$188.2*
*Excludes taxes, tariffs, duties and interest
OpEx per Tonne of Feed
Category Year 3+ (Run Rate)
Mining US$3.93
Processing US$11.02
General & Administrative US$6.78
Total OpEx per Tonne of Feed US$21.73
OpEx per Tonne of Concentrate at Mine Site
Category Year 3 onward (Run Rate)
Mining US$63.79
Processing US$178.92
General & Administrative US$109.94
Total OpEx cost per Tonne of Concentrate at Mine Site US$352.65
All capital and operating costs expressed above are considered to be accurate to +/- 10%, and assume a varying inflation rate of 1.6% in 2015 and escalating to 2.0% from 2017 onward. Currency inflation rates were also considered in the financial model.
Transport (Molo Site to European customer)
Average transport cost: US$337 per tonne of concentrate (from Mine site to Europe via Fort Dauphin, Madagascar, in December 2014 terms)
DRA has not included any financial or operational calculations and/or scenarios in the FS financial model with regards to downstream value-added processing of the graphite concentrate. This includes purification, spherodization coating for battery-grade graphite and thermal expansion for specialty graphite applications, such as foils.
The exchange rates used in the financial model are as follows:
11.31 South African Rand (ZAR) to US$1, moving in line with purchasing power parity
0.833 Euro to US$1, fixed for the modelled period
2,746 Malagasy Ariary (MGA) to US$1, moving in line with purchasing power parity
The graphite prices are based on current quotes and projected estimates provided by UK-based Roskill Consulting Group Ltd ("Roskill"), who are recognized as a leader in providing independent and unbiased market research, pricing trends and demand and supply analysis for the natural flake graphite market.
The FS "2017 Start-Up" price for a tonne of Molo graphite concentrate was calculated from the weighted average price per tonne of US$1,375 (in December 2014 terms, considered by Roskill to be the bottom of the market), which is a continuation of trends from 2005 (excluding the 2010 to 2013 unusually high graphite concentrate prices). The price shown is the weighted average price for the various flake sizes and grades of flake graphite that are expected to be produced from the Molo deposit.
A summary of certain significant differences between the FS and the Company's Molo Preliminary Economic Assessment Study ("PEA") are as follows:
The PEA assumed 1.16 million tons ("MT") per annum of ore, resulting in 84,000 tpa of graphite concentrate.
The PEA CapEx estimate accuracy was +/- 25%, based on order of magnitude estimates.
There has been a reduction in head grade to the plant from 8.5% C to 7.04% C.
The FS includes delivery costs to Europe.
The FS has assumed 50% debt funding on an eight operational year basis, whereas the PEA assumed 57% debt on 10 years.
The FS has a more well defined flow sheet.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The proposed development of the Molo graphite project includes the construction of an open pit mine, a processing plant with a capacity of 862,000 tonnes of ore per annum and all supporting infrastructure including water, fuel, power, tailings, buildings and permanent accommodation.
The mine will utilize four 2 megawatt diesel generators, with three running and one standby by and water is supplied from a well field which has been defined by drilling and geo-hydrological modelling. The processing plant will consist of conventional crushing, milling and flotation circuits followed by concentrate filtering, drying and screening. The waste heat generated by the power station will be utilized for the drying of the concentrate.
The tailings storage facility, in the form of a valley dam layout, is located approximately 1.5 kilometres to the west of the process plant and is designed to accommodate the run-of-mine tonnage for the 26 year life of mine.
RESOURCES
The Molo project hosts the following resources:
Measured mineral resource of 23.62 MT grading 6.32% carbon ("C").
Indicated mineral resource of 76.75 MT grading 6.25% C.
Inferred mineral resource of 40.91 MT at 5.78% C.
Effective date of the Mineral Resource tabulation is August 14, 2014. The Mineral Resources are classified according to the Canadian Institute of Mining definitions. A cut-off grade of 4% C was used for the "higher grade" zones and 2% C for the "lower grade" zones. Please note that while the 'high' grade resource occurs within the 'low' grade resource, each was estimated and reported separately. A relative density of 2.36 tonnes per cubic metre was assigned to the mineralized zones for the resource estimation. The resource remains open along strike and to depth. The Mineral Resources above are inclusive of the Mineral Reserves below.
PROVEN AND PROBABLE MINERAL RESERVES
As a result of the FS, the following maiden proven and probable mineral reserves are declared.
Category Tonnage C Grade (%)
Proven 14,170,000 7.00
Probable 8,367,000 7.04
Proven and Probable 22,437,000 7.02
Proven reserves are reported as the Measured Resources inside the designed open pit and above the grade cut off of 4.5% C. Similarly, the Probable Reserves are reported as the Indicated Resources inside the designed open pit and above the grade cut-off of 4.5% C.
METALLURGY
The FS is based on a full suite of metallurgical test work performed by SGS Canada Metallurgical Services Inc. in Lakefield, Ontario, Canada. These tests included lab and bench scale process development work, a bulk sample/pilot plant program, and metallurgical variability testing. The tests indicated that variability exists across the deposit but this has been mitigated by the design of the flow sheet. The overall graphitic carbon recovery into the final concentrate is 87.8% using samples from all drill holes within the five year pit design. The average composition of the combined concentrate grade is presented in the table below.
The area composites were generated by splitting the area within the five-year mine plan into five zones. All drill holes within one specific zone were then combined to form an area composite. A total of fifteen area composites were generated for metallurgical evaluation (five zones with three depth intervals per zone). All assays were completed using control quality analysis and cross checks were completed during the mass balancing process to verify that the results were within the relative error of the analytical method.
Metallurgical Data - Flake Size Distribution and Product Grade
Product Size % Distribution Product Grade (% Carbon)
+48 mesh (jumbo flake) 23.6 96.9
+65 mesh (coarse flake) 14.6 97.1
+80 mesh (large flake) 8.2 97.0
+100 mesh (medium flake) 6.9 97.2
+150 mesh (medium flake) 15.5 97.3
+200 mesh (small flake) 10.1 98.1
-200 mesh (fine flake) 21.1 97.5
Pricing Matrix - Flake Size Distribution Grouping and Product Grade
Product Size % Distribution Product Grade (% Carbon)
>50 mesh 23.6 96.9
-50 to +80 mesh 22.7 97.1
-80 to +100 mesh 6.9 97.2
-100 mesh 46.8 97.6
Initial Capital Cost Summary
Cost Centres Expressed in US $ millions
Pre-production 37.3
Tailings Storage Facility ("TSF") 24.3
Mechanicals 20.8
Electrical, Control & Instrumentation 20.8
External services 17.9
Earthworks 11.8
Piping 7.4
Structural 5.6
Transport 5.5
Vendor packages 3.4
Civil works 2.5
Consumables and spares 2.4
Buildings, fittings 2.1
Plate work 1.9
Total Capital Costs 163.7
Future capital expenditures expected to be incurred has been allowed for in the financial model to cover the expansion of the TSF in Year 2, the replacement of the mine fleet, the replacement of the power plant, and for rehabilitation at the end of the project.
ENVIRONMENTAL & PERMITTING
A comprehensive Environmental and Social Impact Assessment ("ESIA") was completed to local Malagasy, Equator Principles, Word Bank and International Finance Corporation (IFC) standards. The process was preceded by an Environmental Legal Review and an Environmental and Social Screening Assessment; both providing crucial information to align the project development and design with international best practice on sustainable project development.
The ESIA submission is subject to approval of the investment amount by Madagascar's Ministry of Mines, which is anticipated in February 2015. The application was submitted on January 30, 2015. Energizer will receive a Global Environmental Permit upon approval of the ESIA, a process which is expected to take six months from date of submission.
A comprehensive permitting register is in place and additional sectorial permit applications will form part of the early execution phase. Approval of the sectorial applications is expected within the same six month period as the ESIA review.
No material issues were identified in relation to Environmental, Social and Permitting processes and through the stakeholder engagement process the local and regional community has expressed a desire for the project to move forward.
QUALIFIED PERSONS
The FS was prepared in accordance with National Instrument 43-101 standards by DRA Mineral Projects Pty Ltd. The qualified persons named below verified the data, as appropriate including the sampling, analytical and test data underlying the information contained herein using industry acceptable standards.
The following Qualified Persons contributed to the FS and will sign off on the relevant sections in the 43-101 report to be filed on SEDAR.
Dr. John Hancox Pri.Sc.Nat Geology (including the Mineral Resource estimates)
Mr. Desmond Subramani Pri.Sc.Nat Geology (including the Mineral Resource estimates)
Mr. Dave Thompson Pr.Cert.Eng Mining (including the Mineral Reserve estimates)
Mr. Oliver Peters Pr.Eng Process Test Work
Mr. Doug Heher Pr.Eng Process Design, CapEx, OpEx, Infrastructure, ESIA
Mr. John Stanbury Pr.Eng Marketing and Economic Analysis
Mr. Doug Heher, PR.Eng, is a consultant with DRA Mineral Projects Pty Ltd. and is independent of the Company. Mr. Heher is the qualified person who reviewed and approved the technical information provided in this press release.
I have a new slogan for Supreme " Supreme is building the Target for Medical marijuana". As target has gone out of business in Canada so will SL. Look at that lack of PP. Only $258,000 raise. Nothing to boast about, that's FORSURE.
Still no inspection date. Not surprising it will be after the injunction at the end of February for health canada to even consider an inspection of the property. Fac 1 was already denied. Not a good track record.
Not surprising as I said this is going even lower where ever that first PP was priced at. Those warrants and options should be coming due very soon. Hence MORE DILUTION.
lol the article gets taken off ....lol...seeking alpha is a joke.
That is how you know a company like seeking alpha is not providing the truth about a company. Instead they want to build there database with email address.