Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Time to email the new company about this shitshow and what went down here with Markiplier, the zag Boxes, Toys r us, all the shit. I am at least.
Good thing they kept our restricted dividend shares, restricted. Lord knows we would have flooded the market and drove the pps to trips. Oh wait....
Good thing they kept our restricted shares
Well you know, we had to get the bags right. That was the issue the whole time lol. Benny is a sack of shit.
Loving this! :) :) Thanks for all the dd man!
Weird that the auditors, all of them, multiple audits, disagreed with these cold hard “facts”. Maybe they are being misinterpreted, maybe they are personal investments, maybe they're doctored. I don’t know and that isn’t the point. The point is 100% of the third party professional accounting that has been done has all came to the same conclusion. No company property. Gltu.
Documents that NO court or NO audit has ever recognized as part of the company holdings. In fact every court that has seen them has dismissed them as irrelevant and not admissible because NO AUDITOR ever has agreed that they are company holdings, and the auditors on the re-audit upheld their accounting as true and accurate, in court. SO again, your entire theory hinges on the fact that the auditors are lying. I don't buy it. They are third party and are sure as shit not going to hang their neck on the line as a firm for a pink.
No court has said it does exist. No audit has said it does exist.
HOWEVER, Audits do say that there is no company property holdings. Testimony does exist that the accounting is true and accurate representation of company holdings. Attempts to bring fictional properties in court have all had the same result. Thrown out. Again, this entire thing hinges on the belief that multiple auditors are all lying... These auditors who are not associated with the company in any shape or form.
Okay, so if it comes out that the Auditors are lying and falsifying reports then you have a leg to stand on. Same applies to any property in CA, since there is no company property per the auditors, re audit, court flings and filed testimony, there were no laws broken. So apparently this all hinges on your assumption that the auditors are lying? Is that correct?
So your claim is that the auditors, a THIRD PARTY not beholden to Ed or Company in any shape or form, are knowinly lying about their audit to protect themselves? Good to know.
Secondly, re-read my post, I said I am not discussing why Maciora's case was dismissed, he lost for a plethora of reasons. I am stating the auditors are on record stating that the accounting is a true and accurate representation of the company holdings. If your counter to that is that the auditors are crooked or lying to cover their own ass, well that's a rabbit hole I'm not going down. This has been seen by multiple parties in multiple courts, always the same result. No company property.
Thanks for your opinion though, it's nice to hear other views. GLTU.
Incorrect.
Actually if you read the testimony and article filed by the auditors, they testified that their accounting was a true and accurate representation of the company holdings. I am not referring AT ALL to why the case was dismissed. That's an entirely different matter. Maciora has lost all of his cases, and is currently losing in Sacramento against the company as well. I am referring to the Auditors filed statement that their accounting is a true and accurate representation of the company holdings. Thanks for your opinions though. Fortunately all of this is public record so no need for speculation.
Reloading more here, I feel like fins and company announcements are just around the corner, finally. I’ve been here for years, I drove out and took pics of the facility in Idaho, as I’m sure some of you remember. This is a real company doing real things, we just need the CEO to get his shit together and get current. No doubt the OS is much larger than the 198 million from the last filing, my closest guess from watching over the years would be 2-4 billion. I have no facts to justify this, just math from watching trades. Regardless, How many pinks have products on the shelves in stores?
Incorrect again.
The auditors testified that their accounting is a true and accurate representation of the holdings. No company property. This is not debatable, it happened, in court. Then Charlie A attempted to bring it in his suit, again thrown out, because NO Auditor EVER has agreed with you opinion.
Again I would suggest you send your hypotheses to the auditors and they will be able to better inform you why your information is incorrect. Thanks for your opinion. Gltu.
Incorrect.
I don’t have to explain anything. There is no need. The auditors said, in court, their accounting is a true representation of the company’s holdings. The accounting has no property being owned or purchased by the company. So again, thanks for your opinions, but I will stick with the auditors facts. When there is property accounted for by the auditors, that is a different story entirely. I would suggest maybe you forward your hypotheses to the auditors, they will be able to better inform you as a shareholder why your information is incorrect. It’s all in the filings. Thanks for your opinion.
Said no auditor ever which equals, not accounted for, which equals not a holding of the company. Thanks for your opinion though. GLTU.
Where is said real estate accounted for? What auditor? What company accounting? This has been run into the ground, and in fact a judge just threw out Charlie A’s attempt to bring the fictional company real estate into his case. Maciora lost his ass with his case against the auditors in Washington where the auditors again said their accounting was true and accurate. No company real estate to be found. So again? Where does this exist anywhere outside of funny looking online documents littered with misspellings and incorrect parcel numbers ? In the most recent attempt in the Charlie A case,It was tossed as irrelevant since no auditor ever has said the company has any real estate holdings. I will stick to facts as presented by auditors who have testified in court that their accounting is true. Ed's personal investments, be what they are if any, would appear to be just that, personal investments. Thanks for your opinion though.
Actually not, Brit was referred to as a “her”. Britt is a he. Wanted to make sure we were taking about the same company. Also, where is, or can you provide the link to the post or message about why Fins are delayed? Dd is important.
Britt is a male. Dd is important.
Well “someone” is a completely different can of worms then “broker”. It’s not cost effective for a person to short a pink, crazy expensive, but brokers and MMS do all the time because of the volume they have. It is interesting, call your broker and ask. I think you’ll be surprised to hear what they can do with your shares unless you tell them they can’t, which you have to do.
It’s actually not true. I checked with a couple brokers, and it’s literally in every TOS you sign, brokers can and do short your shares all the time, regardless of what you do. Scottrade is notorious for this, which is why they will periodically put a hold on the pinks and your ability to trade them. You can call your broker and specifically tell them that you don’t want your shares shorted, which in turn usually requires some kind of written deal to them, but without, they can and do. At least that’s what my DD has turned up on the 4-5 brokers I called and checked.
Totally agree. So much going on behind the scenes with this tech. What are your thoughts on Leo?
Notice to board. Any and ALL posts about other posters or their posts in use to attack them is off topic, claiming people are bashers/pumpers is off topic, using their post history to show they are pumpers/bashers is off topic. This board is about ALKM. Everyone is entitled to their opinion. The veracity (truth) of said opinion has nothing to do with whether or not they can post it, it is their opinion. Everyone needs to stick to the TOS. Posts about the company and stock are what this is about. Do not attack other posters. If you disagree with someone's opinion, disagree with the opinion instead of attacking the poster. Keep it on topic guys, I don't want to have to delete things.
Hey all, any and all posts about other posts or posters are off topic. I don’t want to have to delete stuff, please stick to the TOS. Everyone is entitled to their opinion. Please keep it on the company.
Benny was denied his R/S by Finra, so now he's gonna dump the rest of the AS. He's a total scumbag.
PURA Announces ALKM To Join In EVERx CBD Infused Bottled Water Product Launch At Arnold Sports Festival March 2015
Source: InvestorsHub NewsWire
Puration Announces Alkame Holdings To Join In EVERx CBD Infused Bottled Water Product Launch At Arnold Sports Festival March 2015
Dallas, TX – February 9, 2017 - InvestorsHub NewsWire - Puration, Inc. (USOTC: PURA) today announced Alkame Holdings, Inc. (USOTC: ALKM) will participate in the official launch of EVERx CBD Infused Bottled Water to be held at the Annual Arnold Sports Festival (formerly the Arnold Classic) in Columbus, Ohio starting March 2nd, 2017 and continuing through March 3rd. PURA combines its proprietary CBD with ALKM’s patented alkaline water. Representatives of both companies will be on hand to present the EVERx CBD Infused Bottled Water and answer questions.
EVERx is a new sports, fitness and wellness nutritional supplement brand specializing in products infused with cannabidiol (CBD). The EVERx brand was launched by, and is owned by North American Cannabis Holdings (USOTC: USMJ). PURA licensed from USMJ the rights to develop and market a CBD infused water. EVERx CBD Infused Bottled Water is the first EVERx brand commercial launch.
Named for Arnold Schwarzenegger, The Arnold is host to over 70 sporting events with 18,000 athletes. The Arnold will include an Expo with over 1,000 booths. EVERx CBD Infused Bottled Water can be found at the Arnold in the City BlendsTM VIP Suite. In addition to serving EVERx CBD Infused Water, City BlendsTM Smoothies blended with EVERx CBD Infused Water will also be available.
To learn more about the EVERx CBD Infused Water product launch at the Arnold Sports Festival, follow the link below:
EVERx CBD INFUSED WATER LAUNCH AT THE ARNOLD SPORTS FESTIVAL
To learn more about North American Cannabis Holdings: growusmj.com.
Follow the Company on Twitter: US_HEMP
To learn more about Puration: purationinc.com
Follow Puration on Twitter: Puration710
Visit Puration on Facebook: Facebook.com/puration/
To learn more about Alamke Holdings, Inc.: alkameholdingsinc.com
Disclaimer/Safe Harbor: This news release contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Securities Litigation Reform Act. The statements reflect the Company's current views with respect to future events that involve risks and uncertainties. Among others, these risks include the expectation that any of the companies mentioned herein will achieve significant sales, the failure to meet schedule or performance requirements of the companies’ contracts, the companies’ liquidity position, the companies’ ability to obtain new contracts, the emergence of competitors with greater financial resources and the impact of competitive pricing. In the light of these uncertainties, the forward-looking events referred to in this release might not occur. These statements have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration. These products are not intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent any disease.
North American Cannabis Holdings Contact:
Steven Rash
Phone: +1-972-528-0162
Email: Info@growusmj.com
Puration Contact:
Brian Shibley, CEO
info@purationinc.com
+1-214-937-9097
Nice!! Time to march forward! Myec!
Still no idea what you are referring to. Do you have a link to your alleged meth use? This is MYEC, a fintech company. Lots of good information is available in the ibox to introduce yourself to the company workings. No meth here, maybe confused with another ticker? Gltu.
Who is Team Metheaded? No idea what you are talking about. Meth? Wrong ticker?
TEAM Maciora being sued by the company.
MyECheck vs Kenneth Maciora. Securities Litigation
Civil Complex cases are assigned to Department 35 for judicial management to avoid placing unnecessary burdens on the court, litigants, and to expedite the case. The Honorable Alan Perkins presides as the complex case management coordinator.
Characteristics of Complex Civil Cases
Antitrust or trade regulation claims
Construction defect claims involving many parties or structures
Securities claims or investment losses involving many parties
Environmental or toxic tort claims involving many parties
Claims involving mass torts
Claims involving class actions
Insurance coverage claims involving Trade regulations or class actions
Other Cases Which Involve:
Numerous pretrial motions raising difficult or novel legal issues that will be time-consuming to resolve
Management of a large number of witnesses or a substantial amount of documentary evidence
Management of a large number of separately represented parties
Coordination with related actions pending in one or more courts in other counties, states, or countries, or in Federal court.
Tentative Ruling: Unless otherwise specified, the court does not normally issue tentative rulings for complex case management conferences. Nonetheless, counsel should check for a tentative ruling after 2:00 p.m. on the day before the hearing.
Law and Motion: Unless the Presiding Judge has specifically assigned a case to one Judge for all purposes, all law and motion matters remain in the law and motion departments assigned to the case (Departments 53 or 54). However, Class Certification Motions will be heard in the complex case management department to which the case has been assigned and Case Management Orders are to be delivered to the complex case management department to which the case has been assigned.
Trial Setting: Civil Complex cases will be scheduled for trial by the Complex Case Management Judge in coordination with the Presiding Judge and the Head of the Civil Division.
CourtCall Telephonic Appearance: Unless a mandatory appearance is ordered by the court, the party(s) may appear by phone. For information and questions about CourtCall Telephonic Appearance - external link, please call CourtCall, LLC, rather than the clerk, at (888) 88-COURT (26878). Counsel may request a CourtCall Telephonic Appearance no later than 4:00 p.m., the Friday prior to the hearing by contacting CourtCall Telephonic Appearance - external link.
Case Management Statements: All case management statements are to be filed fifteen (15) days prior to the hearing with the clerk of the assigned department.
Counter Designation Statements: Counsel is to call the clerk of Department 35 for a hearing date and time for a counter designation hearing and deliver a copy of the counter designation statement to Department 35.
6/6/2017 9:30 AM
https://www.saccourt.ca.gov/civil/complex-case-calendar.aspx/OTUwOTU3@
MyECheck vs Kenneth Maciora. Securities Litigation
Delgado, William , Empire Relations Group Inc , Zalunardo, Rod , River North Equity LLC ,Riptide Capital LLC
06/06/2017 9:30 AM Case Management Conference - Complex
https://services.saccourt.ca.gov/PublicCaseAccess/Civil/SearchByCaseNumber
Enter 2016 and Case Number 00202624
I want PURA to buy ALKM
It might be time for me to head out to the company and take some pics of the operation again.
Hope so!!!
TEAM Maciora being sued by the company.
MyECheck vs Kenneth Maciora. Securities Litigation
Civil Complex cases are assigned to Department 35 for judicial management to avoid placing unnecessary burdens on the court, litigants, and to expedite the case. The Honorable Alan Perkins presides as the complex case management coordinator.
Characteristics of Complex Civil Cases
Antitrust or trade regulation claims
Construction defect claims involving many parties or structures
Securities claims or investment losses involving many parties
Environmental or toxic tort claims involving many parties
Claims involving mass torts
Claims involving class actions
Insurance coverage claims involving Trade regulations or class actions
Other Cases Which Involve:
Numerous pretrial motions raising difficult or novel legal issues that will be time-consuming to resolve
Management of a large number of witnesses or a substantial amount of documentary evidence
Management of a large number of separately represented parties
Coordination with related actions pending in one or more courts in other counties, states, or countries, or in Federal court.
Tentative Ruling: Unless otherwise specified, the court does not normally issue tentative rulings for complex case management conferences. Nonetheless, counsel should check for a tentative ruling after 2:00 p.m. on the day before the hearing.
Law and Motion: Unless the Presiding Judge has specifically assigned a case to one Judge for all purposes, all law and motion matters remain in the law and motion departments assigned to the case (Departments 53 or 54). However, Class Certification Motions will be heard in the complex case management department to which the case has been assigned and Case Management Orders are to be delivered to the complex case management department to which the case has been assigned.
Trial Setting: Civil Complex cases will be scheduled for trial by the Complex Case Management Judge in coordination with the Presiding Judge and the Head of the Civil Division.
CourtCall Telephonic Appearance: Unless a mandatory appearance is ordered by the court, the party(s) may appear by phone. For information and questions about CourtCall Telephonic Appearance - external link, please call CourtCall, LLC, rather than the clerk, at (888) 88-COURT (26878). Counsel may request a CourtCall Telephonic Appearance no later than 4:00 p.m., the Friday prior to the hearing by contacting CourtCall Telephonic Appearance - external link.
Case Management Statements: All case management statements are to be filed fifteen (15) days prior to the hearing with the clerk of the assigned department.
Counter Designation Statements: Counsel is to call the clerk of Department 35 for a hearing date and time for a counter designation hearing and deliver a copy of the counter designation statement to Department 35.
6/6/2017 9:30 AM
https://www.saccourt.ca.gov/civil/complex-case-calendar.aspx/OTUwOTU3@
MyECheck vs Kenneth Maciora. Securities Litigation
Delgado, William , Empire Relations Group Inc , Zalunardo, Rod , River North Equity LLC ,Riptide Capital LLC
06/06/2017 9:30 AM Case Management Conference - Complex
https://services.saccourt.ca.gov/PublicCaseAccess/Civil/SearchByCaseNumber
Enter 2016 and Case Number 00202624
Yet, it's coming, and yes, many of us care.
MyECheck vs Kenneth Maciora. Securities Litigation
Civil Complex cases are assigned to Department 35 for judicial management to avoid placing unnecessary burdens on the court, litigants, and to expedite the case. The Honorable Alan Perkins presides as the complex case management coordinator.
Characteristics of Complex Civil Cases
Antitrust or trade regulation claims
Construction defect claims involving many parties or structures
Securities claims or investment losses involving many parties
Environmental or toxic tort claims involving many parties
Claims involving mass torts
Claims involving class actions
Insurance coverage claims involving Trade regulations or class actions
Other Cases Which Involve:
Numerous pretrial motions raising difficult or novel legal issues that will be time-consuming to resolve
Management of a large number of witnesses or a substantial amount of documentary evidence
Management of a large number of separately represented parties
Coordination with related actions pending in one or more courts in other counties, states, or countries, or in Federal court.
Tentative Ruling: Unless otherwise specified, the court does not normally issue tentative rulings for complex case management conferences. Nonetheless, counsel should check for a tentative ruling after 2:00 p.m. on the day before the hearing.
Law and Motion: Unless the Presiding Judge has specifically assigned a case to one Judge for all purposes, all law and motion matters remain in the law and motion departments assigned to the case (Departments 53 or 54). However, Class Certification Motions will be heard in the complex case management department to which the case has been assigned and Case Management Orders are to be delivered to the complex case management department to which the case has been assigned.
Trial Setting: Civil Complex cases will be scheduled for trial by the Complex Case Management Judge in coordination with the Presiding Judge and the Head of the Civil Division.
CourtCall Telephonic Appearance: Unless a mandatory appearance is ordered by the court, the party(s) may appear by phone. For information and questions about CourtCall Telephonic Appearance - external link, please call CourtCall, LLC, rather than the clerk, at (888) 88-COURT (26878). Counsel may request a CourtCall Telephonic Appearance no later than 4:00 p.m., the Friday prior to the hearing by contacting CourtCall Telephonic Appearance - external link.
Case Management Statements: All case management statements are to be filed fifteen (15) days prior to the hearing with the clerk of the assigned department.
Counter Designation Statements: Counsel is to call the clerk of Department 35 for a hearing date and time for a counter designation hearing and deliver a copy of the counter designation statement to Department 35.
6/6/2017 9:30 AM
https://www.saccourt.ca.gov/civil/complex-case-calendar.aspx/OTUwOTU3@
MyECheck vs Kenneth Maciora. Securities Litigation
Delgado, William , Empire Relations Group Inc , Zalunardo, Rod , River North Equity LLC ,Riptide Capital LLC
06/06/2017 9:30 AM Case Management Conference - Complex
https://services.saccourt.ca.gov/PublicCaseAccess/Civil/SearchByCaseNumber
Enter 2016 and Case Number 00202624
lol... okay. I'll stick to facts, company releases, UBA announcements, and DD then where company workings are in question. Thanks for your opinion. GLTU and happy trading.
MEC + UBA = EmailMoni
Agree and correct! As stated, no veracity, zero truth, and/or validity to the claim that not a single purchase on Earth has occurred. Thanks.
Where is the link that states no purchases have ever been made? TIA.
BULLSHIT, incorrect, and completely false. Here are some links from UBA to help with the basic workings and understanding of the company and what they are doing.
UBA + MEC = EMAILMONI
"Pan-African financial services group, United Bank for Africa Plc has entered into agreement with MyECheck to provide a new revolutionary social commerce payment system, called “EmailMoni.” EmailMoni is the world’s newest game changing technology and will dramatically advance the payments landscape in Nigeria and across Africa. The platform is a next generation payments technology that enables"
https://www.businessdayonline.com/uba-unveils-email-based-banking-platform-emailmoni/
Here's some other links for your future reference. Here are SEVERAL of the announcements, from fintech, from UBA, from MYEC etc. Plenty more to be found.
http://www.businesspost.ng/2016/10/20/uba-transforms-banking-with-emailmoni/
http://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/MYEC/news?id=142830
http://nigeriacommunicationsweek.com.ng/e-financial/uba-redefines-banking-with-email-based-platform-emailmoni
https://www.businessdayonline.com/uba-unveils-email-based-banking-platform-emailmoni/
It's all listed in the lawsuit, stickied and recently posted for you to be able to do your own dd. Hope that helps. Gltu.