Orders of magnitude beyond the TPM.

https://venturebeat.com/2019/11/05/google-announces-opentitan-an-open-source-silicon-root-of-trust-project/

hearing on emerging tech in plastics recycling

House Science Subcommittee on Research and Technology
Tuesday, April 30, 2019

Witnesses:
--- Mr. Paul Sincock, City Manager, City of Plymouth, Michigan
--- Dr. Govind Menon, Chair, Dept of Physics and Chemistry, Troy University
--- Dr. Gregg Beckham, Senior Research Fellow, National Renewable Energy Laboratory
--- Mr. Tim Boven, Recycling Commercial Director, Packaging & Specialty Plastics, Dow

Less about conversion (into fuel, for example) than about recyclability without generational degradation (like aluminum, for example).

.

Function of your own settings/history.

Do the authors know the difference between chapter 7 and chapter 11?





.

"expect to continue"?




.

Shareholders in highly innovative companies with solid foresight and rigor in their research and development activities should be happy to see large amounts remain in the corporate treasury rather than being paid out in dividends.

When a company like Amazon or Google reaches a point where they have dollars that they have nothing better to do with, only then should they pay a dividend.

The Android ecosystem does not want your trollish help.





.

I beg your pardon, crudeoil24. I intended to post that market-cap point as a reply to MikeBK205's #2429.





.

Comparing shareprices of companies that have different numbers of shares outstanding makes no sense.

Priceline's shareprice is ~ $1,900 and its market cap is ~ $93 billion.

Amazon's shareprice is only ~ $1,007 but its market cap is ~ $480 billion.

Apple's shareprice is only < $155 but its market cap is > $800 billion.






.

Just how might he do that?





.

You're right.

Amazon had three splits in a 15-month period spanning 1998-1999 that aggregated 12:1.

Wow.



.

Google had a 2:1 split three years ago.

Sure about that?



.

An engineer ought to be able to deduce what patent trolls do.





.

Tell Buffett.




.

One possibility is that it was undervalued before.




.

Thought so.

Can you back that up?




.

Can you back up those allegations with links to facts?




.

How do you reach the conclusion that a given subcontractor is an illegal immigrant?




.

Yeah. That single contract to update our Government computer systems.



.

You continue to relate "overpriced" to a need for a split.

Let's say that you think a certain company that has 10 million shares outstanding at a share-price of $800 is overpriced. Do you think that this company would be priced differently after a 40:1 split leaves it with a share-price of $20 (even though the resulting number of shares outstanding -- 400 million -- would have the market continuing to capitalize the value of the company at $8 billion?





.

Why on earth would they sell their cloud business?




.

That's why percentages are useful in assessing price changes.

A 1% increase in a position occupied with 200 shares at $400 = $800.

A 1% increase in a position occupied with 100 shares at $800 = $800.

It's a matter of sound math.





.

Would I be a rookie to think that owning 100 shares at $800 is as good as owning 200 shares at $400?




.

They did a 2-for-1 split in 2014.




.

$450?




.

Right.

On Jan. 5, 2017, you wrote: "Added a few to the short side today."

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=127651779




.

Did you cover your series of shorts at lower highs, each time declaring that "shorts only short the highs"?




.

Do you mean Walmart (rather than Amazon)?

"shorts only short the highs"?






.

I can see how selling (writing) puts is bullish. How do you figure that buying puts is anything but bearish, defensive, or hedging?

Discount?

I think what you're calling the Hotmail logo actually is a Gmail logo.




.

I prefer to have a CEO focus on running the business rather than running the stock.





.

Apple's spin is one thing. Describing the Supreme Court decision is another.




.

You're doing a service by clarifying that the decision of the Supreme Court was on the proper measures of damages, not on liability. They did not let Samsung off the hook for infringing on Apple's design patent. They sent the case back to the court below for re-assessment of the damage award. But as long as you're at it, why not clarify as well that what Samsung is liable for is infringing, not "stealing and infringing."




.

You might have more screens than you can handle.





.

Where did I say anything of the sort ... bud?





.